
Originally Posted by
Jimmors
Im gonna go out on a limb and say yes, he probably wouldve been just as bold. Mostly by the fact that he came in with full body protection, BP vest, riot helmet, leg guards, etc. So he was damn well expecting to be involved in a fire fight, whether that came at the hands of the police or the public at large, one way or the other he was prepared for it.
Something else i was thinking about today, saw a news clip where they interviewed the brother of that Fox Sports reporter who survived the Toronto shoot out, Jessica Ghawi. He was saying that he didnt even know the shooters name, nor he cared to, that this should all be about the victims, not the perpetrator.
And i thought, wow...what a wonderful idea it would be if instead of plastering HIS (Jim Holmes) photo all over the place, and going on and on about HIM, that instead, most news media would focus on the victims, plaster THEIR pictures everywhere, repeat their names, make them the ones we remember, NOT Jim Holmes. Unfortunately, we only seem to focus on the criminals, when it shouldnt be that way. Seriously, besides direct family and friends, can any of us name a single victim from VT? Columbine? Ft Hood? But we all seem to know who the murderers are. Media needs to change this, give bare minimum coverage to Homes, and spend their airtime showing pictures and repeating the names of the victims. Show potential future mass murderers that they will NOT be immortalized by media, which is precisely what this guy wants.