-
The Bears aren't who we thought they were
There are three undefeated teams in the NFL after week three. One has already taken down two Super Bowl contenders. This same team has played mostly without their starting left tackle, free safety and number two wide receiver. Yet, this group is treated like an aberration among NFL pundits. They're brushed off with a flick of the wrist like Christine O'Donnell in The New York Times newsroom. The Chicago Bears are 3-0. So why are they treated like they're the opposite? I'm not sure who the Bears have to beat this year to get some respect. The '72 Dolphins?
The root of this question is based on Chicago's week one performance. Facing the woeful Lions, the Bears blew chance after chance until Detroit's Calvin Johnson pulled in what looked like a go-ahead touchdown pass in the final seconds. The referees correctly ruled that Johnson "did not finish the process of the catch." As good as it looked, the touchdown was voided. This was certainly an ugly victory, but an old Al Davis quote summed up the Bear mentality following the game. "Just win, baby, win." It doesn't matter how you do it.
The Bears last two opponents, Dallas and Green Bay, were picked by most analysts to represent the NFC in the Super Bowl this year.
Playing in Dallas' new monstrosity of a stadium, Bears QB Jay Cutler picked apart an All-Star Dallas defense to the tune of 277 yards, while the Chicago 'D' limited Tony Romo. The most impressive part of the win, however, was how Chicago's makeshift offensive line kept Cutler relatively upright against a fantastic Dallas seven-man front.
Under the bright lights of Monday Night Football this past week, the Bears snatched victory from the jaws of defeat, squeaking out a 20-17 win over the Packers. Neither team played well, but the Packers struggles were magnified after the game. Green Bay committed 18 penalties, which surely was the reason why they lost. (How a "contender" sets the record for penalties in a game is beyond me.) Outside of Chicago, the general consensus was that the Packers are a better team and simply handed the Bears the game -- therefore Chicago shouldn't take much satisfaction in the win. This is ridiculous on multiple levels. As I previously said, any win is a good win, especially against a hated division rival on national television. Second, Jay Cutler threw six interceptions in two games against Green Bay last year. In these matchups, the Packers won by six and seven points respectively. These two victories were the difference in the Packers making the playoffs. By the media's logic, the Bears handed Green Bay last year's games, giving them less value. Fans and journalists get into trouble when they start justifying losses this way.
The Bears are a completely different team from last year. New offensive whiz Mike Martz has gotten some publicity, but the real additions have come on the defensive side of the ball. Chicago added all-world defensive end Julius Peppers -- a 6-7 300 pound physical specimen -- to shore up their line. They brought back hard-hitting safety Chris Harris, a defensive leader from their Super Bowl run in 2006. Most important, people seem to just forget that the heart and soul of this team Brian Urlacher, missed all of last season with a broken wrist. Take Ray Lewis off the Ravens and see how they do. Look what happened to the Steelers D last year when Troy Polamalu didn't play. Certain marquee guys affect the play and effort of the rest of their defense. Ironically enough, it was Urlacher who forced the eventual game winning fumble on Monday night.
The Bears still receive no credit, because of pre-season expectations. Sports Illustrated, ESPN and everybody in between picked the Bears to be a league afterthought at best, bottom-feeder at worst. Like pundits in all professions, it's hard for most of these people to admit when they're wrong. The Bears go to New York to face the struggling Giants this week, then face Carolina, Seattle, Washington and Buffalo. The team that was predicted by many to win three games could now realistically start the season 8-0. Although judging by the first three weeks, there probably will be an explanation for that too.
-
High Fives / Like - 0 BEAR DOWN!, 0 Dislikes
-
-
Junior Member
I completely agree. I especially am annoyed by the 'analysts' tendency to talk about all the interceptions that Cutler threw (2) that were called back because of penalties. There are interceptions like that...were say an interception is negated by a defensive holding away from the play...NEITHER of those two "interceptions" on Monday night fall into that category. The first interception that wasn't was ENTIRELY the result of the roughing the passer, as Jay's ball went off target because he got a face-full of helmet. No penalty, no interception. The second was the one that Charles Woodson was whining about...but that was a CLEAR case of pass interference AND that pass interference was the ENTIRE reason the ball was intercepted. If Bennett hadn't been tackled...held to the point where he couldn't even turn and challenge for the ball...well, I can't say 100% the ball wouldn't have been intercepted but it would have massively reduced the chance it was. The only real interception that wasn't was the dropped interception by the Pack...but defense's drop potential interceptions all the time. The Bears dropped one just like it in the first half. Or look at the touchdown the Pack had called back. Why was Rogers able to throw that TD that wasn't? Because Peppers got held and Rogers had time. No penalty...who knows if he would have escaped Peppers. And for all the talk about the number of Pack penalities...how about all the holds on Peppers that weren't called? Several of which went for big gainers (even the announcers commented on it). How is the Pack "better" if they have to hold the "over the hill" Peppers (F u Collin Cowherd) every play? No, all the media catterwalling is nothing more than this: looking for excuses to justify their original opinions of the two teams all along. If the Pack had won, no one would be making excuses for why the Bears lost...because the media thinks the Pack is better. But the Bears won...so there must be some reason. D.GOOCH
-
High Fives / Like - 0 BEAR DOWN!, 0 Dislikes
-
It's still annoying, but Bear fans have come to expect this. The Bears get ZERO love from the media. Any media. No matter how well they play, or who they beat.
-

Originally Posted by
BlackDiamond
It's still annoying, but Bear fans have come to expect this. The Bears get ZERO love from the media. Any media. No matter how well they play, or who they beat.
But in the end...who cares? If the Bears finish the season 16-0 and all these pundits are still crying about how the Bears suck, who will be having the last laugh?
Ill take wins over some sports journalist "respect," any day...that respect aint going to win us a Superbowl.
-

Originally Posted by
GOOCH54
I completely agree. I especially am annoyed by the 'analysts' tendency to talk about all the interceptions that Cutler threw (2) that were called back because of penalties. There are interceptions like that...were say an interception is negated by a defensive holding away from the play...NEITHER of those two "interceptions" on Monday night fall into that category. The first interception that wasn't was ENTIRELY the result of the roughing the passer, as Jay's ball went off target because he got a face-full of helmet. No penalty, no interception. The second was the one that Charles Woodson was whining about...but that was a CLEAR case of pass interference AND that pass interference was the ENTIRE reason the ball was intercepted. If Bennett hadn't been tackled...held to the point where he couldn't even turn and challenge for the ball...well, I can't say 100% the ball wouldn't have been intercepted but it would have massively reduced the chance it was. The only real interception that wasn't was the dropped interception by the Pack...but defense's drop potential interceptions all the time. The Bears dropped one just like it in the first half. Or look at the touchdown the Pack had called back. Why was Rogers able to throw that TD that wasn't? Because Peppers got held and Rogers had time. No penalty...who knows if he would have escaped Peppers. And for all the talk about the number of Pack penalities...how about all the holds on Peppers that weren't called? Several of which went for big gainers (even the announcers commented on it). How is the Pack "better" if they have to hold the "over the hill" Peppers (F u Collin Cowherd) every play? No, all the media catterwalling is nothing more than this: looking for excuses to justify their original opinions of the two teams all along. If the Pack had won, no one would be making excuses for why the Bears lost...because the media thinks the Pack is better. But the Bears won...so there must be some reason. D.GOOCH
The penalty was called on #71 on that play. He was holding another Bear in the middle of the line. Peppers was being held by #65.
I agree with your points. Just wanted to point out that even though Peppers was being held on said play, there was another packer holding and cited for the infraction.
-
And don't forget that this is the 3rd regular season game of this new offense. I'm sure there will be bumps in the road, but it should only get smoother as the season progresses. They've had a some sloppy moments in these first three games, it's not even running on all cylinders.
-
the only concerns I have going forward:
1) OL
2) secondary
-
High Fives / Like - 0 BEAR DOWN!, 0 Dislikes
-
The OP has a terrific point. The media (particularly I Chicago ) all predicted that the Bears would suck and they all absolutely HATE Jay Cutler. Now they are looking for reasons to invalidate them and their victories.
Screw 'em.
-

Originally Posted by
Nick
the only concerns I have going forward:
1) OL
2) secondary
3) Quarterback heath
-
High Fives / Like - 0 BEAR DOWN!, 0 Dislikes
Nick High-fived for this post.
-
I think this team is pretty much who we expected, a really good qb, and rb, w/a good(great on paper) DL and LB core(if lb's are healthy); w/questionable db's, wr's and a horrid OL. Somehow they have found a way to overcome the defiecenies though and win games. No one could have predicted 3-0. Give credit to the coaching staff for really whipping people into shape.