So I show you a link and blow it off, but you bring one up and I should hold it as gospel. Now I really have a good idea what type of person you are.
Again I never said the Texans are flawless, but they are getting better.
Printable View
So I show you a link and blow it off, but you bring one up and I should hold it as gospel. Now I really have a good idea what type of person you are.
Again I never said the Texans are flawless, but they are getting better.
you didnt show a link.. you just said "a source i know'.. which is useless( where the link? didn't see one) and when the quote is from the actual GM , yes that does constitute a pretty good source of info.. as opposed to no quote and a anonymous source told me...Quote:
Originally Posted by go4bears
So bears going .500 shows they are not getting better, but the texans going the same .500 shows they are?,, guess till do not see that logic
So YES showing you an exact quote from ANGELO THE GM on the trade IS credible..as opposed to the nebulus from the basement mysterious ;source:
I showed you the link on your beloved Tampa 2. Proving not only fans don't like but Urlacher doesn't like it. Sure he got good number of tackles, but that would happen no matter what d they run. Who knows maybe he would have record number of sacks and tackles if they ran a different d.Quote:
Originally Posted by dabears54
Even your link showed what I was saying and countered what you tried to:
"We did a lot of research on Thomas as a person, and we think he's a good fit on and off the field," general manager Mike Tannenbaum said. "He's a tough, outdoor, Northeast runner, and he provides leadership."
Bears going from super bowl to no play off appearance is good???????
your link showed how well uracher IS suited for the cover-2 and the 'protype" because of speed for it.. whereas he has trouble shedding blockers in the run game and by his own admission gets tied up by Te's.. not as much on other schemes.Quote:
Originally Posted by go4bears
And the next time a GM that gets a players says "well, he's a lockeroom lawyer and problem, but we are rollign the dice because he produces on field ' will be a first.. heck T.O's new team ALWAYS says the same and then fires him and admits he never changed and was a distraction.
The POINT was TJ, NOT BEARS, asked for the trade, and angelo gave it to him to be a good soldier in 2006.. which is the truth
So if TJ a good leader and good player, why did the jets release him?
Quote:
Originally Posted by dabears54
Again the point was Urlacher stated he didn't like the Tampa 2.
Maybe TJ was pressured into wanting a trade????
As far as the jets releasing him, then why is he playing at all if he is such a problem child?
So you are saying other GM's just spout bs and ours always tells the truth?
How could tj be pressured into a trade, that HE requested?
not sure you remember what happend, but Tj threw a fit about benson,, then him and rosensleaze 'threatened' a hlod out of camp in 2006, and didn't show for OTA;s.. and that was when he went to angelo requesting the trade and angelo told him if he came in and wasn't a distraction in 2006, he would trade him after the year- no one was pressured and that was the direct quote i showed you. Tj has *never* disputed it and agreed with it for for beign factual.
And just like problem players like T.O still finds work, TJ has talent, it just wears out quickly( as seen by own 5 teams). And NO All 32 GM's BS and esp when getting a player only talk about the 'good" that is obvious,including angelo
the funny part about TJ is when on card's he threw a fit, about being the #1 Pick and mad cardinals gave another rb carries and split time with him, when he was the top choice.. then mad on bears when a #1 pick comes and he shouldn't have to share carries... then goes to jets and once again mad has to split carries and gets fired once again for the same problem