-
Bears' plan goofy, but it's a plan
By Mike Imrem One thing we know for sure about the Bears: Management doesn't mind looking goofy.
They simply wipe the blush off their faces, start over and risk making the next gaffe.
That became clear this week when head coach Lovie Smith treated the debacle against the Giants as just another loss.
“We're looking at a 3-1 record and feeling pretty good about that, Smith said the next day.
Another sign of the Bears' penchant for embarrassment came Tuesday when they signed veteran defensive end Charles Grant and terminated the contract of Mark Anderson.
This certainly is the move that will propel the Bears into the Super Bowl, as long as Grant can make the transition from defensive line to offensive line in the first 15 minutes of today's practice.
Only kidding, of course, though it's difficult to imagine Grant or anyone else who weighs more than a matchstick faring any worse than the Bears' pass protectors did at the Meadowlands.
After the Grant-Anderson trade-off, Smith and general manager Jerry Angelo surely have a couple of offensive linemen in the pipeline ready to arrive sometime this week.
Don't they?
Midseason roster moves aren't unusual. Most teams make them, and the Bears are admirable for trying to upgrade a 3-1 team.
But these are the Bears, not the Colts or Patriots or Steelers. This isn't a team that inspires a lot of trust.
The Bears consummated several transactions last off-season based on Anderson being prepared to be at least a co-starter at defensive end opposite free-agent acquisition Julius Peppers.
Yes, Anderson was the guy. His time had arrived. Five years of evaluation and investment determined that.
Then four games into the season the guy who was the guy wasn't the guy anymore. The evaluators were wrong and dumped Anderson.
Much is being made of Bears players being held accountable. But the more who have to be, the more that management has to be for expecting so much of them in the first place.
Anyway, as difficult as it must be for the Bears to admit mistakes, it would be worse to compound them by not trying to make corrections.
Give Angelo and Smith credit for that. They decided to move on from Anderson no matter what public perception would be.
Who cares if the Bears' roster starts to look like management threw a handful of players in the air once and then have to do it again?
This week Anderson, somebody the Bears previously had confidence in, landed outside Halas Hall, and Grant, somebody previously out of the NFL, landed inside.
If the Bears continue operating the way they operate and making the sort of decisions they make and still win three of every four games …
Well, they'll be on the way to the Super Bowl for sure.
The Bears might get on the wrong charter, land in Canada, have to take a cab from Saskatoon to Dallas and arrive in Cowboys Stadium five minutes before kickoff.
But they'll get there, deal with the consequences and pound the Jets or Steelers or whoever challenges them.
It's starting to look like all the trial and error and fits and starts and goofiness and embarrassment are by design.
Hey, at least it's a plan, which is more than normally expected of Halas Hall.
mimrem@dailyherald.com
http://www.dailyherald.com/article/2...ts/710069972//
-
-
Midseason roster moves aren't unusual. Most teams make them
as said earlier. Mid season treads happen all the time. but some just care to complain
-
You have to believe the Bears front office isn't as completely useless as is being suggested.
Maybe they knew Anderson was beyond reclamation even before the regular season got underway. Maybe they had spent the past few weeks evaluating suitable replacements and Grant finally made the top of the list. Had the Bears crushed the Giants, this move would probably just spark another column on the loss of another Angelo draft pick.
But the Bears were the ones that got crushed.
And, as they say in the comedic world in which the Bears have currently taken up residence... timing is everything.
-

Originally Posted by
matsellah
You have to believe the Bears front office isn't as completely useless as is being suggested.
Maybe they knew Anderson was beyond reclamation even before the regular season got underway. Maybe they had spent the past few weeks evaluating suitable replacements and Grant finally made the top of the list. Had the Bears crushed the Giants, this move would probably just spark another column on the loss of another Angelo draft pick.
But the Bears were the ones that got crushed.
And, as they say in the comedic world in which the Bears have currently taken up residence... timing is everything.
he has been on the roster for 4 years before this season. He was useless after his rookie year. Why would year 5 be any different? So it was wise to sign him to a one year guaranteed 1.7 mil deal? That is what a shit gm would do. You sign 5 bums like that to that type of contract then you start losing guys like Alex Brown to salary cap dumps. That isnt what a gm does.
and to top it off we draft a guy in the 4th round ignoring other concerns for the team and dont play him. How is that something a good gm does?
-
High Fives / Like - 0 BEAR DOWN!, 0 Dislikes
-
Wootton won't see the field by the looks of it-a redshirt that took up OL draft space
Anderson could have been traded for small change BEFORE the season
Harrison and T.Harris underperforming more than Anderson who led team at least in qb pressures
Gilbert cut despite signs of small life
ALL this activity on the DL yet we are "happy" with the guys we have on the OL? And on top of it he pulls this at this time? NOT a good GM.
Arguing on the internet is like winning the special olympics, even if you win your still messed up.
Restore the roar!
-

Originally Posted by
short faced bear
than Anderson who led team at least in qb pressures
QB pressures is a useless stat in this case because DE's are going to be your top pass rushers. With Peppers getting every double team, whoever plays the other side is going to get QB pressures. The fact the other side has 0 sacks is just terrible, no reason for a DE not to have even 1 sack yet when all the attention is on Peppers and you are guaranteed 1 on 1 matchups all day. Anderson is terrible, people need to let go of his rookie year.
-

Originally Posted by
JustWinBaby
QB pressures is a useless stat in this case because DE's are going to be your top pass rushers. With Peppers getting every double team, whoever plays the other side is going to get QB pressures. The fact the other side has 0 sacks is just terrible, no reason for a DE not to have even 1 sack yet when all the attention is on Peppers and you are guaranteed 1 on 1 matchups all day. Anderson is terrible, people need to let go of his rookie year.
Yes I said Least which is better than what Harrison and Harris have produced. At LEAST it is something. I agree Anderson after rook year was zero.
Arguing on the internet is like winning the special olympics, even if you win your still messed up.
Restore the roar!
-

Originally Posted by
Nick
as said earlier. Mid season treads happen all the time. but some just care to complain
I wouldnt' mind treading for a O-line. Maybe Tread Tommie Harris for Logan Makins straight up??? Good tread IMO.
-
High Fives / Like - 0 BEAR DOWN!, 0 Dislikes
-
these tread ideas are craaaaaaaaazy lmfao I mean why the hell would the patriots tread for a overhyped, overpaid DT. If anything they would want to tread for maybe Bowman or Graham and a 3. But a tread for Harris is unlikely. Hell even an announcer said he wouldnt tread a loaf of bread for Harris
-
High Fives / Like - 0 BEAR DOWN!, 0 Dislikes
Nick High-fived for this post.
-

"It's all part of a plan..."