Thread: Up next for Bears: Washington Redskins

Originally Posted by Guitarzan-54

Hell NO! ..... LOL!!!!

I would LOVE for us to win more then 3 games the rest of the year.....and I have learned over the years to NEVER bet against the BEARS.
They'll screw'ya every time!

........



It's Reverse Psychology ..... and always seems to work.


.... although, THIS year.......I really don't think they have the Fire Power they need to sustain this illusion of being #1 in the division.
I honestly believe it's just a matter of time.

I said yesterday that I believe that these teams that are not doing well right now are just in a slump, and will snap out of it. They're not losing by much.
Hell, even the LIONS are "Close".
You can see that the teams that are doing poorly are better teams then they are projecting themselves as, and you get the feeling that it's just a matter of time before they get their shit together and come out like the guns of hell.
But, the BEARS appear to be winning the games that their winning by luck. And that they really don't have a whole lot more in the tank.
It's always because of the opponent beating themselves....not because of the BEARS beating them.

Horrible performances ~ yet ugly wins.

They can not sustain that for long. And we've all been saying that since the first (LIONS) game.

But, am I willing to change my sig?......Hell NO! ~ Kegstand made that for me and I'm very partial to it.



.........



.

give me ugly wins over pretty losses all the time.. give me wins no matter how, over losses each and every time. And the cardinals did that to the superbowl 2 years ago.. pitts won the superbowl going up/down all year and ugly wins in 2007.. So guess we shall always disagree about that

Originally Posted by Bear Goggles

Seattle's D 2nd to last in pass defense.

Stats don't matter with this team. We'll gain 144 yards this week, we seem to play into proposed weaknesses.

I got it.....more Maluemalenaualmalu pass receptions. WIN!!!

While stat's don't win or lose a game, does give you an indication on where/how to attack a team

Originally Posted by Bear Goggles

Agreed but we don't do it well.

we do it inconsistant right now.. Did it well against packers/dallas and carolina did it awful against seattle and giants..

Originally Posted by Bear Goggles

Problem is we had Giants when they were down and a Seahawks team that couldn't win on the road and our O-line makes those teams look like world beaters. We need to win games at home, our end of the season stretch is brutal and I can't see this inconsistent team winning a playoff game right now.

Despite the beating in the first 1/2.. we were down 3-0 to the giants, and the carolina game proved how BAD collins was, when he came out on the 3rd quarter.. So Guess do not see the "direness" of that game.

Agree about Seattle MUCH more dissapointed in this loss, because seattle is not a good team and agree 100% need to win these home games.Just saying the 'theme for NFL 2010 should be "inconsistant" and it applies to all teams, bears are not the only ones by any stretch of the imagination..Am i pissed we lost?, Oh yeah!,,did the oline stink up the joint? and the "D" not muhc better? oh yea! but Could we have wondespite all that? sure.. but like how people 'excuse" other teams losses, find it funny how we don't get the excuse of a kick off TD called back, a sack that took us out of Fg range, and missed 54 Fg any of which either wins the game or ties it for OT for even in a "bad loss " game.

its funny how other teams losses are not "bad losses, because they committed bad penalties or made mental mistakes, but doesn't meana bad team..but somehow when bears do this same exact nonsense- its just an awful loss and shows how bad a team we are..The hypocrisy of some and how different they treat the bears IMo just funny at this point