Facebook Twitter

Page 3 of 8 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 77

Thread: BEARS "D" #3 ,by points, 3rd rushing 8th overall, first place

  1. #21
    The Rhymenoceros Jimmors's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Sin City
    Posts
    24,780
    Bear Bucks
    63,297
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by gammabears View Post
    Thank you Jimmors. I owe you a beer or a six pack.
    Dont thank me yet, db never reads my posts anyway.

  • #22
    Banned dabears54's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    19,172
    Bear Bucks
    13,967
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Jimmors View Post
    Gamma's point is that why should we talk about "bright spots" in the stats column after a loss? You could say the Bears were #1 in every stat column, but it still doesnt take away from the fact that we lost to Seattle.

    I can care less what the D is doing because the OL is holding the entire team back, and costing us wins.

    As far as your "yeah but we won 4 games" mantra, that little tidbit will turn from "good point" to "is that all" to "really, we only won 4 games" by the end of the season. Thats why wins > stats, and if they are struggling against bad to medicore teams, then wait til after the Bills game when th schedule gets much harder.
    So we can ony talk about 'bright spots" when we win

    is this really your position?

    is that all" to "really, we only won 4 games" by the end of the season.

    really?? so your stance jimmors is we will not win again?

    hmm i'm willing to see if you will put money where your mouth is.. i'll give you 20-1 odds and you name the amount we do edn up with more than 4 wins..

    Seriously jimmors, are ou really this far off your rocker? you now think we will not win again? or just more spew from you? that you really don't beleive

    ( and yeah we need to play those "hard teams" like the packers and lions again, yep we can't beat them..lolol.. and that vikes team that is 2-3 yep.. no chance there..sounds alot like the "no way the bears beat dallas on the road and packers, bears will be 1-2 to start the season!.. who did that turn out?
    Last edited by dabears54; 10-19-2010 at 03:32 PM.

  • #23
    Banned dabears54's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    19,172
    Bear Bucks
    13,967
    Post Thanks / Like
    BTW jimmors.. should posters after a win not talk about the "bad points"? because you sure seem to have Zero problem with that after a Win.. So why is the converse not allowed? and showing some "good points' and 'good stats" after a losss?

  • #24
    Banned dabears54's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    19,172
    Bear Bucks
    13,967
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Jimmors View Post
    Dont thank me yet, db never reads my posts anyway.
    why lie? that isn't true.. sometimes when you get absurd and the debate going nowhere, don't bother because its going nowhere...but no need to make stuff up

  • #25
    The Rhymenoceros Jimmors's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Sin City
    Posts
    24,780
    Bear Bucks
    63,297
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by dabears54 View Post
    So we can ony talk about 'bright spots" when we win

    is this really your position?
    -as i said...he doesnt read my posts. FEEL FREE TO TALK ABOUT WHATEVER YOU WANT REGARDING THE BEARS. Just realize that alot of us DO NO CARE about stats after a loss, because as ive said: wins > stats.

    Ask me how excited i am about Hester tying the all time return record? Not very. We lost to the friggin Seahawks. Congrats Devin, you turned a 10 point loss into a 3 point loss, heres your cookie.

    is that all" to "really, we only won 4 games" by the end of the season.

    really?? so your stance jimmors is we will not win again?

    hmm i'm willing to see if you will put money where your mouth is.. i'll give you 20-1 odds and you name the amount we do en dup with moer than 4 wins..

    Seriously jimmors, are ou really this far off your rocker? you now think we will not win again? or just more spew from you? that you really don't beleive
    Its called "hyperbole." look it up.

    ( and yeah we need to play those "hard teams" like the packers and lions again, yep we can't beat them..lolol.. and that vikes team that is 2-3 yep.. no chance there..sounds alot like the "no way the bears beat dallas on the road and packers, bears will be 1-2 to start the season!.. who did that turn out?
    Hold your horses their chief. You really lumped the Packers in with the Lions nonchalant-like? The same packers team that beat themselves up with their penalties, on the road, and STILL almost was able to win the game? And now we have to go up to lambeau to face em again, that game is going to be alot harder then you think it is. And i can care less that the Vikes are 2-3, historically we split the series with them, so i wouldnt be surprised if we beat them at home, lose on the road.

    And yeah, keep dwelling on the beginning of the season, maybe that will carry you until after the Bills game, but wake me up when we beat Miami, Jets, Patritots, Eagles...then we can talk about stats all you want.

  • #26
    Banned dabears54's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    19,172
    Bear Bucks
    13,967
    Post Thanks / Like
    FEEL FREE TO TALK ABOUT WHATEVER YOU WANT REGARDING THE BEARSJust realize that alot of us DO NO CARE about stats after a loss, because as ive said: wins > stats.
    than this is the wrong thread for you,and you should move on.. problem solved for all!! : )

    so i wouldnt be surprised if we beat them at home

    and there goes the only 4 win theory..lol

    Its called "hyperbole." look it up.

    as long as you can admit just making stuff up you don't really beleive,, got no problem with the over-exggerations you don't really beleive.. and the 'idea" of only 4 wins you dn't really think is true.. got it

    and weren't you saying "who cares we beat the lions, wake me up if we beat the packers and dallas".. and now that doesn't seem like much to you.. oh well..lol

  • #27
    The Rhymenoceros Jimmors's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Sin City
    Posts
    24,780
    Bear Bucks
    63,297
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by dabears54 View Post
    than this is the wrong thread for you,and you should move on.. problem solved for all!! : )

    so i wouldnt be surprised if we beat them at home

    and there goes the only 4 win theory..lol

    Its called "hyperbole." look it up.

    as long as you can admit just making stuff up you don't really beleive,, got no problem with the over-exggerations you don't really beleive.. and the 'idea" of only 4 wins you dn't really think is true.. got it
    Keep reading whatever you want to in my posts, youre a damn pro-bowler at it.

  • #28
    Banned GlobeOfFrogs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    1,608
    Bear Bucks
    4,338
    Post Thanks / Like
    This is good stuff right here.

  • #29
    Banned dabears54's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    19,172
    Bear Bucks
    13,967
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Jimmors View Post
    Keep reading whatever you want to in my posts, youre a damn pro-bowler at it.
    As far as your "yeah but we won 4 games" mantra, that little tidbit will turn from "good point" to "is that all" to "really, we only won 4 games" by the end of the season.
    Its called "hyperbole


    just using your own words and statments *****.. sorry if you now want to run from them. But do understadn why that is your stance now : )
    Last edited by 4th and 26; 10-19-2010 at 07:37 PM. Reason: No name calling please

  • #30
    The Rhymenoceros Jimmors's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Sin City
    Posts
    24,780
    Bear Bucks
    63,297
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by dabears54 View Post
    Its called "hyperbole


    just using your own words and statments *****.. sorry if you now want to run from them. But do understadn why that is your stance now : )
    Yeah, that is my own words. Its a damn shame you have no idea what those words mean, so here, ill help you out:

    hyperbole - 5 dictionary results
    hy·per·bo·le   
    [hahy-pur-buh-lee] Show IPA
    –noun Rhetoric .
    1.
    obvious and intentional exaggeration.
    2.
    an extravagant statement or figure of speech not intended to be taken literally, as “to wait an eternity.”



    Read point #1. Then read #2. Now back to 1, NOW back to me. Sadly, you are not me. But with Old Spice body wash, you can smell like me. This thread is now Diamonds.



    Last edited by 4th and 26; 10-19-2010 at 07:37 PM. Reason: edited quote

  • Page 3 of 8 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •