Thread: BEARS "D" #3 ,by points, 3rd rushing 8th overall, first place

Originally Posted by dabears54

Why? because the eagles "D' not as good, St not as good, their oline stuggling as bad as our's and andy reid never runs the ball.. guess that is why questioned that "opinion"..just using the same critical eye,, which would be the proper way to evaluate 2 teams, right? : )

No. The Eagles D doesn't have to be better than ours, just as good as the Seahawks. Their ST doesn't have to be better than ours, just have to not kick to Hester. Their O-line doesn't have to be better than ours, just chip Peppers and take your chances with whatever practice squad player is on the line that week. Running the ball? Why would you when the quick slant eats us alive?
The Eagles don't have to rank better than us to beat us. The Seahawks just proved that.

Originally Posted by dabears54

you can post whatever you want, never said you couldnt- just pointing out it WAS NOT ON TOPIC( best of the NFC) so asked you to stay on topic ... which i can post right?: )

When I replied to your post there was nothing in it that said NFC.

So who is this 'good team" that manhandles the bad teams in 2010?

Saints? nope! barely beat panthers 16-14 AT HOME , so "Anything less is getting your ass handed to you' so saints not good, right? .barely beat the 1-5 niners 25-22 and sure didn't manhandle either so they aren't good, right?heck the saints couldn't even beat the cards with a rookie qb- at least BEARS MANHANDLED the Panthers 22-6, right? >LOL

Giants? barely beat the lions 28-20(21-17 in 4th quarter) and sure didn't manhandle them and lost to a medicore titans team. so they dont meet your standard..

Philly? barely beat detriot 35-32 and sure didn't manhandle them( seeing a theme, GZ?), barely beat the crappy niners 27-24 so again not manhandling anyone, heck they even lost to the packers, whi we beat so they can't be good, right? : )

Packers? barely beat the lions 28-26, lost to the Bears, redskins and miama so obviously not manhandling anyone and losing, right?


So again will ask, based on your 'standards" who is the tam better than bears? and not doing the same or worse as bears in 2010 against these crappy teams?

Now if your post had specifically said NFC I would have listed a different team but it DID NOT.

Originally Posted by GlobeOfFrogs

No. The Eagles D doesn't have to be better than ours, just as good as the Seahawks. Their ST doesn't have to be better than ours, just have to not kick to Hester. Their O-line doesn't have to be better than ours, just chip Peppers and take your chances with whatever practice squad player is on the line that week. Running the ball? Why would you when the quick slant eats us alive?
The Eagles don't have to rank better than us to beat us. The Seahawks just proved that.

exactly

Originally Posted by 4th and 26

When I replied to your post there was nothing in it that said NFC.




Now if your post had specifically said NFC I would have listed a different team but it DID NOT.

well when ONLY listed NFC teams.. figured that was obvious talking only NFC.. : )

lesson learned with you 4th... despite ONLY listing NFC teams.. need to also state only talking NFC so you don't get confused, my mistake.

Originally Posted by The Benjamin

exactly

hmm by "that reasoning", all we need to do is play like did against the packers right? i mean the packers beat the eagles and we beat the packers, so as long as our "O" plays like did against packers, the "D" plays liek did against the packers and ST also, we do win, right?

Originally Posted by dabears54

hmm by "that reasoning", all we need to do is play like did against the packers right? i mean the packers beat the eagles and we beat the packers, so as long as our "O" plays like did against packers, the "D" plays liek did against the packers and ST also, we do win, right?

I'd prefer more like we played against the Cowboys, but if we can get the Eagles to commit a mile worth of penalties then I say let's go for it. The Packers did when they beat the Eagles, as we did when we beat the Packers.
So, yeah, that is all that was missing on Sunday, the refs weren't our 12th man. Hopefully Lovie can get that worked out this week.

Originally Posted by dabears54

well when ONLY listed NFC teams.. figured that was obvious talking only NFC.. : )

lesson learned with you 4th... despite ONLY listing NFC teams.. need to also state only talking NFC so you don't get confused, my mistake.

YES you should be more specific when writing since the next person that replied to the same post as I did also listed teams from the AFC. It is not our fault you jumbo words together and expect up to totally understand what you are talking about.

Originally Posted by 4th and 26

YES you should be more specific when writing since the next person that replied to the same post as I did also listed teams from the AFC. It is not our fault you jumbo words together and expect up to totally understand what you are talking about.

Wow you make an honest mistake and admit it...and you still can't let it go..LOLOl

where have I heard this before : )

Originally Posted by dabears54

you can post whatever you want, never said you couldnt- just pointing out it WAS NOT ON TOPIC( best of the NFC) so asked you to stay on topic ... which i can post right?: )

Actually...the "TOPIC" was the Bears rankings "OVERALL" (its right there in the title), so buy narrowing to JUST the NFC, YOU are the one going off-topic.