Thread: Haynesworth to be released [755], any interest?

The man can simply dominate a game/linemen when he wants to.

Keyword: want

Current statistics show he "wants" to < 0.05% of the time.

PASS!

Originally Posted by WindyCity

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com...rth-this-week/

Report: Redskins may cut Haynesworth this week
Posted by Gregg Rosenthal on December 6, 2010, 10:22 AM EST

The latest chapter in the Albert Haynesworth saga should be getting more attention, but the Redskins aren’t in the playoff race and we’ve already grown accustomed to Haynesworth as a rarely-useful backup. Another benching barely phases anyone, even when there are a few inflammatory comments thrown in.
Well, the Redskins are considering a way to get everyone’s attention.
Chris Russell of ESPN 980 in Washington (Dan Snyder’s station) reports that the team is giving “serious consideration” to releasing Haynesworth this week. Russell’s team source says the move is “75% likely.”
Haynesworth was inactive Sunday against the Giants after showing up late to a meeting during the week and missing a practice due to illness.
A release would be an appropriate ending to the Haynesworth-Mike Shanahan marriage. It would essentially be an admittance that the team badly mismanaged the situation all year. They held on to Haynesworth too long, paid him too much, and won’t get a draft pick in return. (Or consistent help from Haynesworth on the field.)
Cutting Haynesworth would simply be giving up, like the Redskins did on the field Sunday.

I would sooner have a boiling bleach enema...!!!

The guy is TRASH...!!!

3nagurski

Originally Posted by WindyCity

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com...rth-this-week/

Report: Redskins may cut Haynesworth this week
Posted by Gregg Rosenthal on December 6, 2010, 10:22 AM EST

The latest chapter in the Albert Haynesworth saga should be getting more attention, but the Redskins aren’t in the playoff race and we’ve already grown accustomed to Haynesworth as a rarely-useful backup. Another benching barely phases anyone, even when there are a few inflammatory comments thrown in.
Well, the Redskins are considering a way to get everyone’s attention.
Chris Russell of ESPN 980 in Washington (Dan Snyder’s station) reports that the team is giving “serious consideration” to releasing Haynesworth this week. Russell’s team source says the move is “75% likely.”
Haynesworth was inactive Sunday against the Giants after showing up late to a meeting during the week and missing a practice due to illness.
A release would be an appropriate ending to the Haynesworth-Mike Shanahan marriage. It would essentially be an admittance that the team badly mismanaged the situation all year. They held on to Haynesworth too long, paid him too much, and won’t get a draft pick in return. (Or consistent help from Haynesworth on the field.)
Cutting Haynesworth would simply be giving up, like the Redskins did on the field Sunday.

Converse:

Posted at 11:09 AM ET, 12/ 6/2010 Sources: Albert Haynesworth won't be released


By Jason Reid
Despite ongoing media speculation that defensive lineman Albert Haynesworth may be released soon, the Redskins do not plan to cut him, two people familiar with the situation said Monday.
Haynesworth has again stirred frustration in the organization because of what coaches consider a lack of effort in practice last week and by being late to a defensive meeting, according to people familiar with the situation. But the Redskins are not on the verge of releasing the two-time all-pro player, who earned $32 million in the first 14 months of his contract. By the end of the season, Haynesworth will have been paid $36.5 million for two seasons with the Redskins.
Haynesworth, who has a salary of $3.6 million this season, has been inactive for four games. He has not started a game and has been credited with 13 unassisted tackles and 2.5 sacks.
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/red...worth-won.html

13 unassisted tackles and 2.5 sacks

well, that's at least better than tommie harris' numbers

Originally Posted by lklrlolnlilklsox

Absofuckinglutely I'd want him. His 'tude with the 3-4 change is pussy shit, but the man is still an impact maker. Too bad we are one of the last teams in pecking order to get him off waivers, and there is zero chance he makes it to us.

IMO no one will touch him w/ that contract. He's worked his way out of that kinda coin. The scramble starts 1 minute after he clears waivers.