-
Bears record proves there's method to Angelo'
Bears record proves there's method to Angelo's madness
Offseason spending spree was really careful management of assets that paid off
The Bears bought themselves the No. 2 seed in the playoffs.
General manager Jerry Angelo, in a desperate attempt to save his job, gave away millions like a dying man who just won the lottery.
The McCaskey family decided to make it rain with million dollar checks.
It might make for a marketable screenplay, but it would be a Hollywood version of the truth.
According to an NFL source outside the Bears organization, the Bears ranked 21st in the league in cash spending as of midseason. They spent $114 million, or $34 million less than the Patriots, who led the league in player payroll.
What's interesting is the Bears actually spent $6 million less this year than last. And they spent the same amount this year as they did in 2008. Averaging the previous four years before this one, the Bears ranked 18th in the league in spending.
They actually are a good reminder that teams don't have to be among the league leaders in spenders to be among the league leaders in victories. The Patriots' payroll is bloated because of the contract extension that made quarterback Tom Brady the highest-paid player in the league.
There are examples of teams that spent big but lost big this year. Among them are the Cowboys, Redskins, Dolphins, Lions and Texans.
The roster the Bears put together isn't the result of unusual spending. It's the result of Angelo's vision and making the vision reality.
The Bears had kept their same basic core of players together for three years after their last Super Bowl appearance, but wanted to make a break from the past last offseason. Eight players who started the bulk of the games for the team this year had not been starters in the past.
"The approach was no different from years past, but we had to do more in terms of change," Angelo said. "After three years we felt like we weren't reaching our goals. We needed to make change. Change is never easy, but it our case it was necessary."
That included spending $20 million in 2010 cash on Julius Peppers, the prize of the free agent class. He was the centerpiece of the Bears' turnaround.
"Pass rush was a big part of what we wanted to do based on the philosophy of our scheme," Angelo said. "We wanted to do all we could to generate more rush."
How did the Bears afford Peppers without increasing their payroll? It was about budget appropriation, not budget expansion.
They typically have a number of their own players who are given significant contract extensions every year. They didn't have any of them in 2010. They also subtracted from the payroll when they didn't re-sign Adewale Ogunleye (he made $4.8 million last season), cut Alex Brown (he was due $5 million this year) and released Nathan Vasher (he was due $2.95 million this year).
"We acted not out of desperation, but soundness in all areas, including free agency," Angelo said. "It came with a lot of planning."
They were fortunate Peppers was available in a year when they needed him and they had the financial flexibility to sign him.
One of the reasons they were able to have success with him is many of their recent draft picks provided considerable production.
Six recent picks played their best football in 2010: offensive tackle Chris Williams, running back Matt Forte, wide receiver Earl Bennett, defensive tackle Henry Melton, nickel back D.J. Moore and wide receiver Johnny Knox. Three rookies — safety Major Wright, defensive end Corey Wootton and offensive tackle J'Marcus Webb — also made moves.
Seven of those homegrown products were drafted after the second round, making them excellent values for their salaries.
The Bears also have had veterans who don't have big price tags step up such as defensive end Israel Idonije, defensive tackle Matt Toeaina, cornerback Tim Jennings and safety Chris Harris.
That helped the team absorb the relatively high 2010 cash expenditures to free agents Chester Taylor ($7 million) and Brandon Manumaleuna ($6.105 million).
The Bears got more out of players this year because part of their vision was to improve the coaching and make a re-commitment to player development. In the past, it's possible that some of the young players who contributed this year never would have seen the field. This time, they were given opportunity and better coaching.
What the Bears ended up with is an effective blend of high-priced players and low-priced ones, experienced vets and developing young guys.
"It's not about collecting talent," Angelo said. "It's building a team."
He has done that well.
dpompei@tribune.com
-
-
yes hope and pray every 3-5 years that the majority of nfl teams you face will lose key players from their lineup, paving the way to the playoffs. kick ass method JA.
A better one would be better drafting so we can actually compete year in and year out and make the playoffs more then 2 times in a row.
-
High Fives / Like - 2 BEAR DOWN!, 0 Dislikes
-
"It's not about collecting talent," Angelo said. "It's building a team."
...and we'll go from there....
Arguing on the internet is like winning the special olympics, even if you win your still messed up.
Restore the roar!
-
High Fives / Like - 4 BEAR DOWN!, 0 Dislikes
-
and that part I do agree with, look at Washington and Dallas. It's all about getting the best talent; but if that doesn't fit your scheme or they are poor locker room guys, it screws everything up.
-
High Fives / Like - 1 BEAR DOWN!, 0 Dislikes
-
I’ll be really surprised if Angelo gets any credit or due around there…he’s the whipping boy for everything wrong with this team and the forgotten man when things go right…I guess that’s nature of the job and of the majority of fans…
Reductio ad absurdum...it's how we roll...
-

Originally Posted by
Wolfman
I’ll be really surprised if Angelo gets any credit or due around there…he’s the whipping boy for everything wrong with this team and the forgotten man when things go right…I guess that’s nature of the job and of the majority of fans…
He deserved to be the whipping boy for his stupid bonehead moves he constantly makes. If you give him enough chances, eventually he wil make a good decision.
-
General managers, much like managers and owners, get none of the credit but all of the blame.
Simple fact of life in sports
-
High Fives / Like - 1 BEAR DOWN!, 0 Dislikes
-
I don't know about that, Polian seems to get a lot of credit in Indy, and a national level. I bet the GM in Philly gets a lot of credit in that area also. The Pitt and KC owners were always given a lot of credit; and Dallas is a perfect example of Jerry Jones got a lot of credit when they won 3 sb's, and gets a ton of the blame now that it's taken them 10+ years to get to two playoffs. It's just we have been struck w/poor management and owners for so long we forgot what it's like to have good ones to give the credit to.
-
I give him credit for some of the good draft picks and free agent pickups... but... he's had way more bad draft picks than good ffs. Quite a few bad free agent pickups too. Adam Archuleta and Orlando Pace?
-

Originally Posted by
gammabears
I give him credit for some of the good draft picks and free agent pickups... but... he's had way more bad draft picks than good ffs. Quite a few bad free agent pickups too. Adam Archuleta and Orlando Pace?
I give him credit for all the times he traded up to land a player.
-
High Fives / Like - 1 BEAR DOWN!, 0 Dislikes