Facebook Twitter

Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 47

Thread: Why is no one talking about Starks 2.6 ypc?

  1. 01-16-2011, 07:35 PM #11
    GlobeOfFrogs
    GlobeOfFrogs is offline
    Banned GlobeOfFrogs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    1,608
    Bear Bucks
    4,338
    Post Thanks / Like
    Why is nobody talking abour how this is not even close to Bears football discussion?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  • 01-16-2011, 07:39 PM #12
    Henry Burris
    Henry Burris is offline
    Specialist Henry Burris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    15,549
    Bear Bucks
    18,178
    Post Thanks / Like
    Items Trophy Gift received at 11-03-2011, 03:39 PM from JC23JC23Bears Head Logo Gift received at 11-02-2011, 07:50 PM from JC23JC23Pitcher O Beer! Gift received at 10-30-2011, 04:47 PM from GermansbombedPHUsername Bold Gift received at 05-16-2011, 12:54 PM from BearStuffUsername Bold Gift received at 03-01-2011, 09:34 AM from dabears54
    I think you are, but there's plenty of other threads....

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  • 01-16-2011, 09:51 PM #13
    paulottcarruth
    paulottcarruth is offline
    Junior Member paulottcarruth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    3
    Bear Bucks
    1,026
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by GlobeOfFrogs View Post
    Why is nobody talking abour how this is not even close to Bears football discussion?
    Maybe because he wasn't even needed until Aaron Rodgers absolutely lit up the world and they gave him the rock when Atlanta knew GB was just trying to run out the clock?

    I think I'd be more worried about Matt Forte's 3.2 yd average against the pathetic Seahawk run defense. GB can win without Starks... Chicago can't win without a big game from Forte.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  • 01-16-2011, 09:52 PM #14
    Henry Burris
    Henry Burris is offline
    Specialist Henry Burris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    15,549
    Bear Bucks
    18,178
    Post Thanks / Like
    Items Trophy Gift received at 11-03-2011, 03:39 PM from JC23JC23Bears Head Logo Gift received at 11-02-2011, 07:50 PM from JC23JC23Pitcher O Beer! Gift received at 10-30-2011, 04:47 PM from GermansbombedPHUsername Bold Gift received at 05-16-2011, 12:54 PM from BearStuffUsername Bold Gift received at 03-01-2011, 09:34 AM from dabears54
    When Forte is stymied in the run game, we generally throw to him, as an alternative to running, and that's worked more often than not.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  • 01-16-2011, 10:11 PM #15
    JustWinBaby
    JustWinBaby is offline
    Member JustWinBaby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    680
    Bear Bucks
    4,472
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by paulottcarruth View Post
    Maybe because he wasn't even needed until Aaron Rodgers absolutely lit up the world and they gave him the rock when Atlanta knew GB was just trying to run out the clock?

    I think I'd be more worried about Matt Forte's 3.2 yd average against the pathetic Seahawk run defense. GB can win without Starks... Chicago can't win without a big game from Forte.
    lol, Forte chalked up 135 total yards in this game, fantastic game. I'll take that again next week. He average 6.0 a carry against the Packers at Lamblow, and I'll take that again with it.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  • 01-16-2011, 10:17 PM #16
    GlobeOfFrogs
    GlobeOfFrogs is offline
    Banned GlobeOfFrogs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    1,608
    Bear Bucks
    4,338
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Henry Burris View Post
    When Forte is stymied in the run game, we generally throw to him, as an alternative to running, and that's worked more often than not.
    His YPC wasn't blowing anyone away but those were quality runs. YPC don't mean squat when your team wins.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  • 01-17-2011, 10:47 PM #17
    Incubes12
    Incubes12 is offline
    Junior Member Incubes12's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Buffalo, NY
    Posts
    96
    Bear Bucks
    3,429
    Post Thanks / Like
    Because...we won.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  • High Fives / Like - 1 BEAR DOWN!, 0 Dislikes
    BEAR DOWN! purplejokr say BEAR DOWN!
  • 01-17-2011, 10:48 PM #18
    Jimmors
    Jimmors is offline
    The Rhymenoceros Jimmors's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Sin City
    Posts
    24,844
    Bear Bucks
    63,693
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Incubes12 View Post
    Because...we won.
    Straight and to the point. Hard to argue with that.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  • High Fives / Like - 1 BEAR DOWN!, 0 Dislikes
    BEAR DOWN! purplejokr say BEAR DOWN!
  • 01-18-2011, 12:59 AM #19
    packer_smacker
    packer_smacker is offline
    Member packer_smacker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    514
    Bear Bucks
    343
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Incubes12 View Post
    Because...we won
    Quite certain Packers won't win v the Bears if Starks has a 2.6 YPC again
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  • 01-18-2011, 01:22 AM #20
    go4bears
    go4bears is offline
    Senior Member go4bears's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Clinton, Utah
    Posts
    3,984
    Bear Bucks
    5,351
    Post Thanks / Like
    If Forte and Taylor have a similar game this week. We will win hands down. Cutler will be freed up to throw and he will be more apt to run or dump it to them.
    Without weaponz it's just another airline!
    I am here to chew bubble gum and kick butt and I am all out of bubble gum!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
    • Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
    « Cover who? | Go Steelers! »

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •  

    Forum Rules