Why is no one talking about Starks 2.6 ypc?

**Mike Holmgren** · 01-23-2011, 07:52 PM

Originally Posted by Jimmors

Better question is...did YOU even watch the game?

So lets recap:

Packers started out strong...took a 14 point lead, put it on cruise control, Bears were falling apart
Then low and behold, the bears 3rd string QB comes along and puts up 7...Bears only down by a score
Does McCarthy get some more points on the board with his offense? nah. Raji gets a lucky pick 6 from an inexperience QB.
But hey, that helps put ANOTHER 7 points up, going right back into 7 point range again
Does the packers offense strike back to seal the game? nah...they get shut down AGAIN.

None of this matters, since we lost...but still doesnt change the fact you obviously stopped watching the game at halftime.

Yes, let's recap. The Bears played 8 men in the box most of the 2nd half. Why not against the 32 personnel (Rhino) packages they were running. There was no balance. Because you don't follow the Packers it's understandable that you don't recognize when McCarthy starts to coach tight. Second, the Raji pick 6 was a fire zone. He dropped off to the middle and assumed the final 3 player responsbility in the scheme....he's too big to run to the seam in a fire zone. Never said the Packers put it on cruise control. I'm saying McCarthy's butt hole got as tight as pebble....he always coaches this way in tight contests. His play calling was abysmal in the red zone....especially on the Urlacher INT. The Bears were ripe for boot passes but he never took advantage of it because he's an idiot. Yes, none of this matters to you because you don't understand football. You see it as linear....like baseball and it's not. Just because A happens doesn't mean it leads to B.

**JustWinBaby** · 01-23-2011, 07:54 PM

Originally Posted by JustWinBaby

Agree totally. Bears D really dominated the 2nd half, amazing 4th quarter. Not sure which adjustements were made but it almost changed the game, the offense however was another story.

I would also love to know who made the adjustments, whether it was Lovie or Marinelli, they deserve alot of credit for what they did at halftime on that defense.

**Jimmors** · 01-23-2011, 08:01 PM

Originally Posted by Mike Holmgren

Yes, let's recap. The Bears played 8 men in the box most of the 2nd half. Why not against the 32 personnel (Rhino) packages they were running. There was no balance. Because you don't follow the Packers it's understandable that you don't recognize when McCarthy starts to coach tight. Second, the Raji pick 6 was a fire zone. He dropped off to the middle and assumed the final 3 player responsbility in the scheme....he's too big to run to the seam in a fire zone. Never said the Packers put it on cruise control. I'm saying McCarthy's butt hole got as tight as pebble....he always coaches this way in tight contests. His play calling was abysmal in the red zone....especially on the Urlacher INT. The Bears were ripe for boot passes but he never took advantage of it because he's an idiot. Yes, none of this matters to you because you don't understand football. You see it as linear....like baseball and it's not. Just because A happens doesn't mean it leads to B.

Except for the fact the bears "8 men in a box" is just a front, and most of the time the safety and LBs drop into coverage...but thats ok, keep telling yourself you think you know it all. its cute.