Thread: Bears v. Packers chat and fall out

Torn means part of the ligament actually separated partly. Sprain usually means it was just stretched too much. There's a difference.

I think he's referring to the fact that it wasn't a rupture (meaning a tear all the way through the ligament).

Originally Posted by Jimmors

because you guys didnt...you jumped out to an early lead, and dominated the first half, but that wasnt the case in the second half. And i dont care WHAT anyone says, if you only win by 7 points, i wouldnt call that "domination"

I know...I'm agreeing with you.

The Bears always play us tough.

Originally Posted by soulman

Are all of you Packer fans members of the "ouda" clan if sheep shaggers? Rodgers didn't lose focus the Bears defense dominated him after the first drive and that was the end of his domination game right there. The Packers offense looked great on two drives and then did squat. In the 4th Q a 3rd string QB who's never thrown one regular season pass passed the livin' shit out of your defense and you can only say you c...."ouda" dominated?

You listen to Joe Buck way too much.

Can Bears fans like you ever come up with something better than sheep? The record sounds broken to me.

Anyways, you c..."ouda" read my whole post and seen that I gave credit to your defense. The fact that the offense was shut down came from a combination of a lot of things, one of those things being that your defense turned things around. You'd be silly to think otherwise.

Originally Posted by Jimmors

Fact: some of us werent at the game and based our opinions on what we saw on tv since thats all we had to go on
Fact: Cutler still played shitty, even before he was injured
Fact: Nobody needed the "media" to say anything, our opinions were formed from what we saw, not what we heard

Yea guess a totally BS holding call on Taylor which would have resulted in a 1st down had nothing to do with affecting the outcome of the first half.Guess the pressure on him had nothing to do with affecting some of his throws ( must be nice to be Rodgers ). Guess it's a logical ASSumption that he would have played the same for the entire game ( cuz no way would he have thrown a TD pass or 2 in this game ). Guess all of peoples negative ASSumptions are ok because they made them ( and the only way to defend themselves is to be as nasty as possible cuz it's hard to admit they jumped the gun ). Guess all the media BS hasn't had any effect on peoples opinions ( cuz people have ALWAYS been this quick to jump on any player, not just Cutler ). Right !! LOL ( roll my eyes ).Never seen so many try so hard to justify their idiocity. Carry on.

Originally Posted by Butka

Name calling aside... It brings up a point. I keep hearing how the Packers O underachieved, and little credit is given to the Bears D.

The Packers offensive output vs. the Bears D this season:

Week 3 - 17 points
Week 17 - 10 points
NFCC - 14 points

Seems like a pretty consistent set there to me. Can we stop calling it an anomaly?

Great point Butka. It's definitely not an anomaly. It's a fact the Bears can stop Aaron Rodgers.

Fact: I love the Chicago Bears, win or lose...


BOOYAH!