Thread: out coached. out played

Originally Posted by Jimmors

well he is correct, outside of that Pick-6, Packers didnt score once in the 2nd half. Bears made some good defensive adjustments during the half, shame Jay had a boo-boo and lovie decided Todd was the man.

packers didn't have to do anything in the second half other than turn the ball over. I would have punted the ball on first down and force Todd Collins to beat us.

Originally Posted by DaBearski

The bears came out flat.. that's on lovie... all of our big losses they played just as flat.. that's a coaches job...

Sent from my Droid using Tapatalk

That is ok because lovie smith has the second best winning percentage in the NFL since 2005.

Originally Posted by 4th and 26

packers didn't have to do anything in the second half other than turn the ball over. I would have punted the ball on first down and force Todd Collins to beat us.

and they didnt do anything....and Hanie kept us in the game...so whats your point?

Originally Posted by Jimmors

Whatever the case, i think its obvious that the bears had some success this year because of our PLAYERS and our coaches not named Lovie...which pretty much means Lovie is not the reason for our succes, hence replaceable.

I agree. With halftime adjustments means Packers had the better game plan to start so out coached from the start but came on betterin the end. Better put. I did lose all faith in Cutler. Hwll. Start Hannie more heart