-
Final film session a bust for Bears
Final film session a bust for Bears
There has been too much talk about the decision to defer after winning the coin toss, about punting instead of attempting a 48-yard field goal and about trying to get cute on a third-down play in the fourth quarter.
If you want to know why the Bears lost to the Packers in the NFC championship game, the tape makes it perfectly clear.
Their quarterbacks failed to make throws that good quarterbacks make, and they did not take care of the football.
Their offensive line failed to protect the quarterback.
Their defensive line failed to generate sufficient pressure.
One of their cornerbacks was picked on all game long and never stepped up.
In short, all of the problems this team has experienced at different points of the season showed up in one game — and it just happened to be the most important game of the season.
Grading key: Grades are between 0 and 10 with 0 being complete failure and 10 being perfect.
Quarterback
Grade: 1
We've seen Bears quarterbacks play like this a time or two. The trio of passers could have easily thrown six interceptions.
Jay Cutler overthrew an open Devin Hester on two potential touchdown passes in the first half. If he hits even one of them, it's a different game. If he hits both of them, the Bears might be making Super Bowl plans.
Cutler was under way too much pressure. He was hit six times, including two sacks. But he was not pressured on either of his overthrows. And he was not pressured on his interception — an underthrow to Johnny Knox.
Cutler's replacement, Todd Collins, does not look like an NFL quarterback anymore. He is fortunate he did not throw two interceptions.
Caleb Hanie, on the other hand, has a nice feel for the game. He handled pressure well, moving around and showing a willingness to throw the ball away. He threw his 35-yard touchdown pass even though linebacker Robert Francois was hitting him low.
Hanie waited a little too long to release the ball a few times, and his receivers paid the price with big hits. No one expected Hanie would win the game, and ultimately he could not. But he did not shrink from the challenge.
Running backs
Grade: 8
If all the Bears played as well as Matt Forte and Chester Taylor, the Bears would have won. They contributed in both the run and pass game, with Forte being very effective after the catch.
With the ball in his hands, Forte did everything a good runner is supposed to do. He showed vision, had burst, put moves on defenders, broke tackles and even used the stiff arm.
Taylor came through in the clutch on fourth-and-1, and scored a touchdown.
Wide receivers
Grade: 7
It wasn't their fault the passing game was a disaster.
Knox and Earl Bennett, in fact, helped their quarterbacks by breaking up potential interceptions.
Knox ran an excellent route and created separation from Tramon Williams on his 32-yard fourth-quarter catch that set up a touchdown. On Bennett's 35-yard touchdown, Bennett had to adjust his body and reach up in the air.
On the end around on third down on the Bears' final possession, Bennett cut up inside instead of following pulling Chris Williams outside. Had he followed Williams, he should have had a first down.
Tight ends
Grade: 4
Greg Olsen also broke up an interception but was largely ignored until the fourth quarter, when he made three clutch catches.
Offensive line
Grade: 2
In the previous meetings against the Packers, the Bears struggled with pass-rushing outside linebackers. This time, big boys Cullen Jenkins and B.J. Raji joined the party.
J'Marcus Webb struggled against outside speed rushes, and Chris Williams played poorly in the fourth quarter. He played high at times and got off-balance at times.
The Bears line run-blocked much better than it pass-blocked.
Defensive line
Grade: 1
Aaron Rodgers had so much time to throw, the Packers could have eaten up the clock by calling for passes.
Julius Peppers didn't have much of an impact on the game. He pressured Rodgers three times. On one of them, Chad Clifton was penalized for holding, and on another, Peppers was penalized for roughing the passer.
No one stepped up to help him in the pass rush. The Bears brought extra pressure on 51 percent of Rodgers' dropbacks but got only one sack out of it.
Early in the game, the Packers' offensive line was opening up huge holes in the running game. The Bears went to sleep on Rodgers' scrambling ability a couple of times and were burned on two big runs.
Linebackers
Grade: 9
The linebackers got stuck on blocks at times in the first half. Brian Urlacher fell for a deke by Brandon Jackson and was victimized on a 16-yard pass play.
But Urlacher and Lance Briggs made big plays, the kind of plays that usually turn games. Urlacher was responsible for preventing at least six points with a sack that took the Packers out of field-goal range and an interception on the Chicago 6-yard line.
Urlacher probably should have had a touchdown on the pick, but he tried to put a move on Rodgers instead of trying to run him over. Then again, Rodgers is 6-2, 225 pounds. There is no guarantee he would have gotten run over.
On an interception that bounced off Donald Driver's shoe, Briggs was a little lucky but a lot alert. Both Urlacher and Briggs made some nice stops in the run game, including Urlacher's tackle of Jackson for a loss of 5.
Safeties
Grade: 6
The safeties had to make too many tackles early in the game, but to their credit they tackled well. Danieal Manning was particularly strong in run support.
The game plan called for a lot of single safety high, and the safeties weren't letting receivers get behind them.
Cornerbacks
Grade: 4
Charles Tillman played very well, but Tim Jennings' performance was on the other end of the spectrum. For the second time in three weeks, the Packers went right at Jennings.
Rodgers threw in Jennings' direction 13 times and exploited him whether Jennings was playing zone or man. Only four of the 13 passes did not result in gains for the Packers. Including two pass interference calls against Jennings, the Packers had 156 in yards from passes thrown in his direction.
Jennings was giving the quicker Packers receivers a cushion, and they took full advantage.
Special teams
Grade: 2
The Packers again managed to negate what should have been a considerable advantage for the Bears. They kicked away from Devin Hester and covered his returns well. It didn't help that Rod Wilson got in Hester's way on two returns.
dpompei@tribune.com
-
-
Cutler missing those 2 throws completely changed everything, especially that first throw. Big plays win games, if thats 7-7 to start, which it should have been, everything would have been different.
-
High Fives / Like - 1 BEAR DOWN!, 0 Dislikes
-
So, let’s see, the Bears had an 11-6 regular-season record, won the NFC North and beat Seattle in the playoffs.
OK, give them a grade of C for all that.
Just a C after being a couple of plays from beating the Packers to reach the Super Bowl?
Well, maybe that assessment isn’t fair. Make it a C-minus.
This was the year for the Bears to qualify for the Super Bowl. The conference was waiting for them to take it and they simply couldn’t.
Goodness gracious the Bears, who lost one player to injured reserve all season, lost to Green Bay, which lost 14 players to IR.
The Packers had to come to Soldier Field for the NFC championship game. They didn’t play particularly well. They still beat the Bears.
The entire NFC stunk. Teams like the Saints and Giants and Falcons and even the Packers kept climbing toward the top before falling back.
All the Bears had to do to take advantage of the parity/mediocrity was beat Green Bay in Chicago before a revved-up home crowd. The Bears couldn’t do it, so what’s there to be proud of, winning a divisional-round game over the NFL’s only under-.500 playoff team ever?
http://www.dailyherald.com/article/2...rts/701249837/
dabears54, the Bears are back to where they were when Smith became the HC, that is, they've got to figure out a way to beat Green Bay. They did quite well against Favre quarterbacked GB teams (6-2), but have done poorly against Rodgers quarterbacked GB teams (2-5). Cutler is now 4-1 against Cutler. It doesn't matter that the 5 head to head games between Rodgers and Cutler have been close. There are no style points in losing. It's a pity the Bears O was so bad against the Packers D this year. When a team gives up 41 points in 3 games to a team (14 average per game) that should be enough to win all 3 games, not lose 2 of 3. The Packers are in the way for the NFC North title in 2011 and these teams could very well met again in the postseason. If the Bears don't figure out a way to beat the Packers then they'll be nothing more than a second place NFC North team that makes the playoffs as a wildcard.
The 1985 Bears are revered because they dominated and they "did it."
The 2010 Bears will be remembered in an ignominious way as the team that lost to their archrivals at home with a Super Bowl appearance on the line, the quintessential indignity.
Disparity between Bears-Packers could get worse
How many times does Dom Capers have to outsmart Mike Martz and Mike McCarthy have to outsmart Lovie Smith and Rod Marinelli for people to realize the Bears are at a disadvantage almost anytime they face the Packers?
3. For the second time in a row against the Packers, the Bears called a time out that negated a successful play and then had the ensuing play blow up in their face. It happened in Green Bay when a last-second time out negated a 19-yard pass play to Chester Tayor and Cutler was sacked for an 11-yard loss on the next play.
It was even more costly this time, when a running play that sure looked like it would have gotten a first down on third-and-three from the Packers’ 27 with 1:20 left was nullified by a last-second Bears time out. Sure enough, Earl Bennett was stopped for a two-yard loss by Desmond Bishop on an end around — an end around, really? — that set up a fourth-and-five that ended with Hanie’s second interception, clinching the victory for the Packers.
http://www.suntimes.com/sports/34694...ip-capers.html
Last edited by GeorgiaJeff; 01-25-2011 at 11:10 AM.
-
High Fives / Like - 1 BEAR DOWN!, 0 Dislikes
-
I disagree that the throw to Knox was underthrown...it was on the money but williams was too
-

Originally Posted by
Nick
I disagree that the throw to Knox was underthrown...it was on the money but williams was too
Cutler has to throw that on the outside shoulder. The receiver gives himself @ 2 yds to the sideline and uses his body lean to shield off the defender. Error Cutler. Argument could be made that Knox didn't turn defender and disrupt the INT, but his position and momentum might have been too much to come back enough.
-
High Fives / Like - 1 BEAR DOWN!, 0 Dislikes
-
Jeff think when all the games ecied by 7 points or less they are very even- and not to state the obvious,but missing your starting qb for the 2nd 1/2 IS a factor in the game sunday
-

Originally Posted by
Rakk
Cutler has to throw that on the outside shoulder. The receiver gives himself @ 2 yds to the sideline and uses his body lean to shield off the defender. Error Cutler. Argument could be made that Knox didn't turn defender and disrupt the INT, but his position and momentum might have been too much to come back enough.
Cutler was already hurt at this point and IMO alot of that throw not having the juice was the MCL
-

Originally Posted by
dabears54
Cutler was already hurt at this point and IMO alot of that throw not having the juice was the MCL
Could see that. Which is why all the crap talk about his toughness and playing through the injury is just asinine. MCL tear on the plant leg makes it like stepping on ice with no support. He was simply physically unable to make the throws, let alone have any lateral movement or ability to run.
-

Originally Posted by
Rakk
Cutler has to throw that on the outside shoulder. The receiver gives himself @ 2 yds to the sideline and uses his body lean to shield off the defender. Error Cutler. Argument could be made that Knox didn't turn defender and disrupt the INT, but his position and momentum might have been too much to come back enough.
The most disappointing part on that was not the throw, I thought the throw was good, but even in high school I learned that you jump and attack the ball at it's highest point. Thats football 101 for WR and CB. Knox was waiting like he was going to basket catch it while the Packer defender jumped at the highest point and grabbed it, Knox has to go after that ball .... you can't sit and wait for it and just let the defender play the ball for the INT, Knox should have went up with 2 hands and fought for the ball as if he wanted to make a play on it.
-
High Fives / Like - 1 BEAR DOWN!, 0 Dislikes
-

Originally Posted by
JustWinBaby
The most disappointing part on that was not the throw, I thought the throw was good, but even in high school I learned that you jump and attack the ball at it's highest point. Thats football 101 for WR and CB. Knox was waiting like he was going to basket catch it while the Packer defender jumped at the highest point and grabbed it, Knox has to go after that ball .... you can't sit and wait for it and just let the defender play the ball for the INT, Knox should have went up with 2 hands and fought for the ball as if he wanted to make a play on it.
or how knox has his hand on the CB helmet and somehow they didn't call the play down there( or even not a INT based on ball on ground)... that whole squence defied logic...
-
High Fives / Like - 2 BEAR DOWN!, 0 Dislikes