Facebook Twitter

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13

Thread: Moon View: Bears will draft Defense

  1. 02-07-2011, 04:45 PM #11
    Blue Horse-shoe
    Blue Horse-shoe is offline
    Senior Member Blue Horse-shoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    South suburbs
    Posts
    1,703
    Bear Bucks
    13,101
    Post Thanks / Like
    Items Old StyleBears C57Brian Piccolo6
    Quote Originally Posted by WindyCity View Post
    http://www.csnchicago.com/02/06/11/M...339&feedID=626

    To give you the quick hits of the article it dicusses the fact that to win in the NFC North the Bears are going to have to stop the Green Bay Offense.

    He believes to do this the Bears must strengthen their defense.

    This is stupid as the Bears offense cost them both games against the Packers.
    So then one could argue, that drafting O-linemen is the way to go cuz that way ( as long as the line can protect Cutler ) then this team has a chance to win, even if most of the games wind up being shootouts. What good is defense when you know the other team is inevitably going to score and your offense can never do anything. I'm for o-linemen and trying to win by out-scoring our opponents when need be.
    What should you call any : Fumble , Hold , Interception , Three and out , or Sack ?

    A " F.H.I.T.S " ? or a J'Marcus ?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  • 02-07-2011, 05:47 PM #12
    Riczaj01
    Riczaj01 is offline
    Senior Member Riczaj01's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    San Antonio Tx, Originally Fort Wayne, IN.
    Posts
    14,563
    Bear Bucks
    45,851
    Post Thanks / Like
    Items Pitcher O Beer! Gift received at 09-21-2012, 11:42 PM from soulman Message: Here's a whole pitcher of it but you'll have to drink most of it. I'm a light hitter. HahaDaBearz MascotDaBears MascotBears CBears Head Logo
    Jimmors had a good point, we did stop their O this year. But how many of the 14 on IR were from their O? I think their starting TE and RB were at least 2 of them. It will be harder next year to stop them; ecspecially depending on how they draft/go through FA.

    But a good way to stop their O is to keep ours on the field longer, which is why you draft OL; which will help stop their pressure from getting to our Qb, which will keep the chains moving and put more points on the board.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  • 02-07-2011, 05:59 PM #13
    Jimmors
    Jimmors is offline
    The Rhymenoceros Jimmors's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Sin City
    Posts
    24,780
    Bear Bucks
    63,297
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Riczaj01 View Post
    Jimmors had a good point, we did stop their O this year. But how many of the 14 on IR were from their O? I think their starting TE and RB were at least 2 of them. It will be harder next year to stop them; ecspecially depending on how they draft/go through FA.

    But a good way to stop their O is to keep ours on the field longer, which is why you draft OL; which will help stop their pressure from getting to our Qb, which will keep the chains moving and put more points on the board.
    I think from a pervious thread, someone pointed out that the majority of their IRs were 2nd and 3rd stringers...i wouldnt be too concerned about who they were missing this year. Plus, our defense was #2 in the league in Run D...only allowing 90 yards avg, and we faced some pretty good rushing teams: Jets(4), Eagles(5), Vikings(10), Panthers (13)

    Fun Fact: GB was 24th in Rushing this year...i dont think they are going to jump to #1 and run all over us just because they get Grant back.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
    • Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
    « WOW That hurts BAD !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! | How 'The Fridge' lost his way »

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •  

    Forum Rules