Thread: Michael scott reacts to Todd Collins vs GB

Originally Posted by short faced bear

The Bears do something no other team would do...have Collins as the #2 qb.

Actually buffalo, kansas and washignton had him as the #2 also...just sayin..

Originally Posted by dabears54

LOL.. i know you need to look for *any* slight thing to argue ,but even the nagger said he wanted him Cut because he "thought" a 2 year deal- which was't true and only a 1 year deal

Not arguing anything. Just pointing out a technicality. Technically, yes, he is STILL a member of the Bears organization. Not saying I want him here.

Not everyone is trying to pick a fight with you DB.

Originally Posted by short faced bear

There's something to aspire to.

Not aspire, but just saying bears were not the only team to have him as a #2.. "The Bears do something no other team would do...have Collins as the #2 qb."...

I'm no fan of collins by any means, and really glad he is gone, and honestly as have said a few times here now, really shocked after the carolina debacle he was still the #2, that was an awful move by lovie/martz to not demote him and move hanie to #2..( oh wait according to some here I never criticize anything and "paid to post here".. so better just pretend I didn't say that : )

Originally Posted by The Benjamin

Not arguing anything. Just pointing out a technicality. Technically, yes, he is STILL a member of the Bears organization. Not saying I want him here.

Not everyone is trying to pick a fight with you DB.

Why point out a meaningless technicality that has NOTHING to do with the original point, which was that a poster was MAD , collins had not been cut because he thought errorenously he had a 2 year contract trhough 2011, and should be cut and not on team for next year- and keeps repeating why isn't collins cut already!!!!

When in truth he doesn't have a contract for next year and teams do NOT cut UFA's for the ANSWER WHY HE ISN"T CUT.. shouln't that have been the end of it?

Originally Posted by dabears54

Why point out a meaningless technicality that has NOTHING to do with the original point, which was that a poster was MAD , collins had not been cut because he thought errorenously he had a 2 year contract trhough 2011, and should be cut and not on team for next year- and keeps repeating why isn't collins cut already!!!!

When in truth he doesn't have a contract for next year and teams do NOT cut UFA's for the ANSWER WHY HE ISN"T CUT.. shouln't that have been the end of it?

Just commenting off yours and BearStuff posts. Technically speaking of course.

Originally Posted by BearStuff

Well aware of that. My statement that he hasn't been cut simply translates into the fact that he is still on the roster until March 1.
Though it was for a reason he didn't realize, nags was correct that he is still on the team.


I will also point out that he wouldn't be cut at this point not only because his contract is about to expire, but cutting him now means reaching an injury settlement.

That is what I said, so be prepared for the same response he gave me...

Originally Posted by dabears54

LOL.. i know you need to look for *any* slight thing to argue ,but even the nagger said he wanted him Cut because he "thought" a 2 year deal- which was't true and only a 1 year deal

So it looks like I took the bullet for you!