-
Bears nearing crossroads with Tommie Harris
Bears nearing crossroads with Tommie Harris
By Brad Biggs
One of the many uncertainties about the NFL's labor situation is what will happen, in the event of a lockout, to players who are due to receive roster bonuses.
Take, for instance, the case of Chicago Bears defensive tackle Tommie Harris. The veteran's status for 2011 isn't known yet and his future is something coach Lovie Smith or general manager Jerry Angelo might shed some light on later this week at the scouting combine in Indianapolis.
Harris was the first draft pick of the Smith era and the coach always has looked out for him, helping push through a contract extension in June 2008 when some in the organization questioned the player's health and the worthiness of an investment.
PHOTO GALLERY: Tommie Harris in action
The Bears appear to be at a crossroads with Harris, who had 18 tackles, two stops for loss and 1 1/2 sacks in 2010. He's due a roster bonus in June of $2.5 million and has a workout bonus of $500,000. That means he stands to collect $3 million before the first snap of training camp. Factor in a base salary of $2,312,500 for 2011 and you know why some believe it's unlikely he'll be around, not at that price anyway.
But if the Bears don't make a move with Harris before the end of business March 3, and if there's a lockout the next day, what happens if the labor matter isn't resolved until July? The owners and players have been meeting for six days in Washington with hopes of reaching a new collective bargaining agreement before March 3. What if they don't?
The Bears have concluded organizational meetings at Halas Hall, where they sort through their roster while also laying the groundwork for offseason plans in both free agency and the draft. Surely, they have an idea what they want to do with Harris. There was discussion about releasing him instead of defensive end Alex Brown last year when the club looked to cut costs after adding Julius Peppers.
For the second straight year, Harris made a late-season push that drew praise from coaches and teammates. He had two sacks in the divisional-round playoff victory over the Seattle Seahawks. But no one would say there was consistency with Harris' game. He plays the signature position in the Cover-2 scheme, the under tackle. And it's not like the Bears have a star in the waiting on the roster to take over for Harris, who was dominant before injuries impacted his play.
If the Bears have Harris, who turns 28 in April, on the roster after the first week of March, they may be planning to keep him at a price tag of $5.23 million next season. The benefit of having a roster bonus delayed like this is it gives the Bears a chance to explore replacements in both free agency and the draft and then evaluate those players in an offseason setting before having to cut a big check.
Typically, players have roster bonuses due in March, close to the start of the new league year. That is when safety Chris Harris is due a modest $500,000 roster bonus. The Bears forced Tommie Harris to push back the roster bonuses in his contract, and the calendar would indicate they have time to make a decision. But in this odd year when the offseason itself could be wiped out by a lockout, do the Bears have time to make a decision with the three-time Pro Bowl performer?
Maybe we'll find out soon. Team aren't certain yet what will happen with offseason bonuses in the event of a lockout. But surely, the Bears must know if Tommie Harris figures in their future.
-
-
think they will try and make some settlement and lower salary agreement with harris, but if he refuses do think he will be cut, because they will not pay the 2.5 mll roster bonus. if he came back just for the salary, do think he stays, but not the Rb
-
I don't think the end of the year was enough to bring him back, as i think he'll look at it as a reason to not take a paycut.
-
He was never the same after that knee injury.
-
High Fives / Like - 2 BEAR DOWN!, 0 Dislikes
-
I say we just cut him and move on. Focus our efforts on Toe, Harrison, any rookie we draft. I still have a soft spot in my heart for Tommie cause he truly was great before that knee inury, and I think THAT has more to do with his lack luster performance than anything but it's time to move on.
-
Sad to see... at one point he was arguably the best DT in the league. I'd say it was him or Haynesworth. Tommie raised hell in the pocket. Talk about a load of talent.
-
High Fives / Like - 2 BEAR DOWN!, 0 Dislikes
-

Originally Posted by
Butka
Sad to see... at one point he was arguably the best DT in the league. I'd say it was him or Haynesworth. Tommie raised hell in the pocket. Talk about a load of talent.
Yep, and that is the "otherside" of football, all players one hit/injury fromnever being the Same- as you said he was arguably the best or top 3 in league at one point before the injuries and will always be a 'what could have been"..you always hate when this happens, as opposed to drugs/bad behaivor for a player that takes him down.And from the player its got to be so sickening KNOWING how good you wee and knowing what you could do- to now just can't do physically you know mentaly could do.
-
To me this is not a decision at all.
He is a headache, he is expensive and he does not produce enough to justify him being on the team.
Even if he offered to play for the vet minimum I would cut him. I would rather have someone who is young and developing then living in the past with Tommie Harris.
The Patriots would have cut him years ago and that is why they win.
-
High Fives / Like - 2 BEAR DOWN!, 0 Dislikes
-
Cut Harris and Harrison and focus on resigning Adams.
Arguing on the internet is like winning the special olympics, even if you win your still messed up.
Restore the roar!
-

Originally Posted by
BigClaws
He was never the same after that knee injury.
He was never the same after he signed his huge contract.
-
High Fives / Like - 1 BEAR DOWN!, 0 Dislikes