Facebook Twitter

Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Bears prepared for difficulties ahead From tr

  1. #1
    Banned dabears54's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    19,172
    Bear Bucks
    13,967
    Post Thanks / Like

    Bears prepared for difficulties ahead From tr

    Bears prepared for difficulties ahead

    From training to team workouts to coaches' pay, uncertainty now rules NFL

    By Michael C. Wright
    ESPNChicago.com
    Archive


    Extensive bargaining sessions brought about only extensions for the NFL and the NFLPA in their attempts to close in on a new collective bargaining agreement.
    As the deadline for expiration of the current CBA approached Friday, the NFL Players Association officially renounced its status as the exclusive collective bargaining representative of the NFL's players, which means the sides now will take their arguments to the courtroom as owners, players and fans brace for a league-wide work stoppage.
    The far-reaching implications of a work stoppage will affect some teams more significantly than others. But every team is affected, nonetheless, including the Bears, who long have been making contingency plans within the football and non-football staff for the situation currently at hand.

    We've all been paying attention to it to see what was going to happen and be up to speed on what they were talking about," Bears cornerback Zack Bowman said. "We knew it was a possibility. Some guys have been saving their money. Some guys have been spending their money. So we'll see what happens. But as far as the union reps, they've been doing a great job during the whole process keeping myself and [my] teammates informed."

    Because of an agreement between the NFL and the NFLPA on somewhat of a media embargo during CBA negotiations, it will be difficult to come by information about how each team -- specifically the Bears -- will operate during a work stoppage with league business essentially shut down.
    "Regrettably, the parties have not achieved an overall agreement nor have they been able to resolve at this time strongly held competing views that separate them on core issues," said George Cohen, the federal mediator for the sides in 17 days of negotiations, who added that "no constructive purpose would be served by requesting the parties to continue mediation at this time."
    This much we know: Teams can't sign players, cut them, trade them or interact with them in any way during a work stoppage, which means clubs can't conduct meetings or official workouts, either.
    Teams also will refuse to pay offseason roster and workout bonuses to players, who are paid 1/17 of their base salaries during each week of an NFL season. With the NFLPA prepping players for this situation for more than two years, concerns about money likely won't be an issue for them at first. But it's believed the league's owners are banking on players to eventually become cash strapped and cave on their demands.
    "You try not to spend a ton, and we've been saving," Bears backup quarterback Caleb Hanie said. "We planned for this, and they've been preparing us for a couple of years to save money. We'll also have some money coming in from the NFLPA that we had saved up. So we're not too worried about money right now, but the money crunch will come in the season when you are missing out on game checks."
    In addition, injured players -- such as quarterback Jay Cutler (knee) -- aren't allowed to rehab at team facilities. In fact, team doctors are allowed to check in on injured players only if their interaction takes place away from a team facility.
    Free agency, meanwhile, won't start until there's a new CBA in place, while the April 28 NFL draft will go on as planned. If the work stoppage continues past the draft, rookies won't be able to sign contracts or communicate with teams except for news conferences for draft picks at team facilities.
    Pre-draft workouts and visits to teams by draft-eligible players will be permitted.
    "We start our offseason program around mid-April," Bears general manager Jerry Angelo said. "So we have plenty of time [for resolution]. I'm very, very optimistic, very hopeful we can get a resolution because it serves all of us. I know that's the intent." Effect on Bears coaches

    Larry Kennan, executive director of the NFL Coaches Association, warned at the NFL combine of the effect the lockout would have on most of the league's coaches, who, interestingly, have no say in the negotiations between the NFL and the players' union

    Kennan said some coaches now face up to 50 percent pay cuts.

    "In almost every coach's contract, there are lockout clauses," Kennan said. "Coaches will take a pay cut in varying degrees [on a] team-by-team basis."

    Although the contracts of Chicago's staff, according to an NFL source, contained lockout provisions that called for a 25 percent pay reduction and a club option to dismiss after a 60-day notice, team president Ted Phillips recently announced there would be no furloughs, layoffs or pay cuts (unless games are missed). A team spokesman confirmed Friday that Phillips' announcement also applied to the coaching staff, but the club does "not discuss specifics of contracts" and the "coaches, like staff, have been told they will not face pay cuts at this time."

    "Every team has a clause that says their salary will be rolled back at a certain point in time. The good teams say they won't roll back salaries for six months," Kennan said. "The bad teams say they'll roll it back immediately, and certain teams have it written into contracts that they can be terminated immediately. That's for all coaches and head coaches." Effects on the team


    Although the Bears continue to express optimism about the strides the offense can make in the second year of Mike Martz's offensive system, that, obviously, will be impossible if the players can't interact with the coaches or spend time at the facilities working to build cohesion.

    "Of course going into the second year, you want to be able to spend as much time as possible with that group," Bears coach Lovie Smith said.

    But that can't happen now. It couldn't happen weeks ago, either.
    According to one AFC coach, the NFL reminded clubs during a meeting with coaches and GMs at the combine that league rules prevented team meetings with coaches to discuss lockout plans or the distribution of playbooks until the official March 15 start of offseason conditioning programs.

    Obviously, that date is meaningless now with a work stoppage. Even if the players wanted to voluntarily meet with coaches to get a jump start on preparation for Year 2 in Martz's system prior to any stoppage, it would have been forbidden. The league didn't want teams doing anything out of the ordinary for fear of violating the dead-period rules for the offseason, which came about because of the NFLPA's desire to not have coaches meeting with players until the official start of offseason programs. "We really can't do any of that," Smith said when asked about the team making plans for a lockout. "We realize some things that happen. We make plans. The players know those plans. We can't make a whole lot of plans of course after [the CBA deadline]. Things shut down. We'll start adjusting."


    That won't be easy. Even well-established teams will struggle to get younger players and rookies up to speed on their offensive and defensive systems if a work stoppage becomes a drawn-out affair. For teams with new head coaches or those such as the Bears, who are still relatively inexperienced in their offensive system, the learning curve could be difficult without adequate preparation.

    "I couldn't even imagine trying to come in and learn Mike Martz's offense in two months or a month," said tight end Desmond Clark, who won't be back with the Bears next season. "Some guys might have to do that if this labor thing is drawn out. Say you go to another team. You've got to learn a whole different language, and that takes time. You just don't get that right away; it takes repetitions. The longer this goes, the more difficult it's going to be to step on the field, and be effective from the standpoint of learning the offense, communicating and those types of things."

    It's a situation expected to play out throughout the league, especially with the seven teams (Cleveland, Oakland, Denver, Carolina, San Francisco, Dallas and Minnesota) expected to start the 2011 season (if there's football) with new coaches.
    "You could say that maybe it's a disadvantage for us," said former Bears quarterback Jim Harbaugh, who recently was hired as head coach of the San Francisco 49ers. "We haven't given our players any type of playbook, and they don't know what our schemes are. It's up to us to adjust, to overcome any and all obstacles out there. We'll think through it and come up with a plan."

    In addition to the difficult learning curve, Clark mentioned possible disruption of team chemistry as a potential detriment to teams during a work stoppage. There's also concern around the league about players rejoining their teams after the labor strife out of shape, a situation a member of the Bears' coaching staff said would be a "non-issue."
    Smith, meanwhile, said "we'll all go by the same rules," which is true to an extent. But clearly, teams with well-established rosters and systems are more likely to have an advantage once a CBA is reached.

    "The only thing I can say is that we're all playing off the same deck. We all have to abide by the same rules," Angelo said. "Obviously the teams that have continuity, that have bigger numbers on their roster -- which there aren't as many given the fact there hasn't been a lot of signings internally with teams -- that's gonna be tougher on those teams [without that] because that means more attrition. Now attrition takes hold. The more new players you have coming in, the less time you have to work with them. It's gonna be a lot tougher."
    Michael C. Wright covers the Bears for ESPNChicago.com and ESPN 1000. ESPN Chicago's Jeff Dickerson contributed to this report.

  • #2
    Yankee Doodle Dandy Dagan81's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Knoxville (Powell), TN
    Posts
    15,688
    Bear Bucks
    43,624
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    5
    Items DaBearz Mascot
Gift received at 08-26-2012, 07:39 AM from ZifanQ
Message: It worked! Here you go buddy! 
Cheers for the answersOld Style
Gift received at 05-15-2012, 10:16 PM from short faced bear
Message: It's not rep but hey it's beerBeer Me!
Gift received at 01-29-2012, 10:01 PM from soulman
Message: Consider yourself beered.Beer Me!
Gift received at 01-29-2012, 09:59 PM from BearJimKeg
Gift received at 10-21-2011, 07:39 AM from Bear Goggles
Message: Beer'd
    I remember the Major League Baseball strike of 1994, and how it ended the season and canceled the World Series. The Yankees were so good that year. They finished the season in 1st Place in the AL East, and looked like they were the team to beat in the American League that year. It killed me. It was one of the few times I cried. Baseball means the world to me, especially the New York Yankees. No doubt that the possibility of losing the Bears next season will sadden me any less, either.

  • #3
    Mello Jello soulman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    PEYTON'S PLACE
    Posts
    22,818
    Bear Bucks
    39,510
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    1
    Items Captain Morgan
Gift received at 11-07-2012, 07:28 AM from GermansbombedPH
Message: Better than that soap water guniessTequilla
Gift received at 09-22-2012, 10:24 AM from Riczaj01
Message: downhere in Northern Mexico(aka San Antonio Texas), we tend to share this....not my personal favorite, but I'm definately in the minority.Trophy
Gift received at 01-30-2012, 01:48 PM from Dagan81
Message: Because you're the best God damn poster on this message board!  And, a true friend at that!9599
    Quote Originally Posted by Dagan81 View Post
    I remember the Major League Baseball strike of 1994, and how it ended the season and canceled the World Series. The Yankees were so good that year. They finished the season in 1st Place in the AL East, and looked like they were the team to beat in the American League that year. It killed me. It was one of the few times I cried. Baseball means the world to me, especially the New York Yankees. No doubt that the possibility of losing the Bears next season will sadden me any less, either.
    Lord son, how did that Tennesse sour mash get your thinkin' so skewed like this. The Yankees are Satan's team son!


    GO SOOOOOXXXXXX!!!!!

  • #4
    Banned dabears54's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    19,172
    Bear Bucks
    13,967
    Post Thanks / Like
    from our NFCN brethern:

    Franchise has prepared for lockout situation Brad Biggs


    As the NFL’s labor situation heads to court in Minnesota, the Green Bay Packers are preparing to clamp down on spending with an uncertain future ahead.

    The club announced on Saturday that it has frozen hiring and salaries and that plans are in place for “sizeable salary cuts” at higher levels within the franchise, according to Richard Ryman of the Green Bay Press-Gazette. Those salary reductions have not taken place yet.

    “They would be put into effect appropriately,” said Jason Wied, the Packers’ vice president of administration and general counsel. “It’s a real possibility.”
    Among those slated for major haircuts to their salary include club president Mark Murphy and general manager Ted Thompson.

    “We need to plan for the worst,” Wied said, per the report. “We wanted to end up with a system where we did not lay off employees. That said, it does require sacrifices on the part of the organization.”

    Because the Packers are a publicly owned entity, their books are open. According to the report, the club has been planning for such a situation by putting money in a preservation fund. That account had $127.5 million at the end of March 2010.
    =======================================

    detriot:

    lionsdon't plan any immediate changes with lockout
    Lewand says fans aren't interested in rhetoric Brad Biggs

    The Detroit Lions don’t plan any significant moves, not at the outset of the lockout anyway.

    Team president Tom Lewand announced Saturday that there would be no layoffs, furloughs or paycuts immediately, according to Dave Birkett of the Detroit Free Press.
    That doesn’t mean changes will not be made down the road. Per the report, NFL Coaches Association head Larry Kennan said Lions assistant coaches could lose 25 percent of their salary if the lockout extends beyond 60 days.

    “We’re not going to get into specifics about what the plans are, but at least in the near term, as we prepare for the draft, as we’re getting ready, we are not making any modifications,” Lewand said on a conference call with reporters. “There will be no changes in staffing as a result of the lockout and there’ll be no changes in salaries as a result of the lockout right now.”

    The Lions have done well at the box office early in the offseason. Lewand indicated renewals and new sales are ahead of where they were at this time a year ago, and that’s to be expected given the team’s growth under coach Jim Schwartz and the addition of defensive rookie of the year Ndamukong Suh.

    “(Fans) are not interested in hearing about which side has what and posturing at the negotiating table or in the courtroom,” Lewand said. “They’re interested in watching Lions football. We understand that. We get it. And that’s what we’re focused on as well. We want to play football, we want to build on the last four games of last year, build on the things that we’ve been doing as an organization the last two years and that’s where the focus needs to be.”

  • #5
    Banned dabears54's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    19,172
    Bear Bucks
    13,967
    Post Thanks / Like
    NFL labor talks now a game of chicken

    By SEAN JENSEN sjensen@suntimes.com .hideTime { DISPLAY: none}Mar 13, 2011 03:

    WASHINGTON — The $1 billion game of chicken is changing venues, with the NFL and the NFL Players Association standoff shifting from Washington to Minneapolis.

    Neither side flinched after 14 days of mediation, so the union decertified and the owners locked out the players.

    George Cohen, the director of the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service, didn’t have any formal authority, unlike the federal judge who will now shape the NFL’s immediate future.

    That judge likely will be David Doty, whom the players favor and the owners dislike. He recently denied the owners access to $4 billion in television revenue — so-called lockout insurance — even if there are no games in 2011.

    To compensate, the owners have been lawyering up, building a who’s-who legal team with remarkable credentials.

    On Saturday, the league announced the retention of David Boies and Gregg Clement. Boies, who has been called “Corporate America’s No. 1 Hired Gun,” has powerful clients, including American Express, Oracle, Al Gore and filmmaker Michael Moore, among others. Clement served as the 43rd Solicitor General of the United States from June 2005 until June 2008, and he has argued more than 50 cases before the U.S. Supreme Court.
    He has been then, done that

    Already collecting fees is Bob Batterman, who players point to as one of the main reasons they believe the NFL’s plan all along was to lock them out.

    “As the Bears’ player rep, I find that the [NFL] obviously wanted this to happen [because] they hired Bob Batterman two years ago,” kicker Robbie Gould said.
    Batterman was the NHL’s ­labor attorney when it locked out players in 2004 for the season and eventually finalized a collective-bargaining agreement that included a salary cap.

    The NFL’s team of attorneys will fight to protect the financial records of each of its 32 teams, which the players have demanded if they are going to consider the owners’ request for $1 billion. When NFLPA executive director DeMaurice Smith and his group left the building Friday, they provided the owners 15 minutes to produce the financials they had long been seeking.

    Secrecy is the deal-breaker

    Even among the owners, financial information is sensitive, coded and constructed to ensure anonymity for most clubs. Owners have made clear the request is a deal-breaker.
    There has been an assumption that the court could make all of that information public, but William Gould said that isn’t necessarily the case. The former chairman of the National Labor Relations Board, Gould said what happens with the “books” is left to the discretion of the judge, who could opt to not allow the players to see the numbers and only review them himself.

    The lines have been drawn between people who just days ago were employees of the same club.

    “We’ll leave it in the hands of the people that it should be, in the courts,” Robbie Gould said. “We didn’t want to get to this situation. .  .  . But the owners brought us to this point.”

    Added Bears president Ted Phillips, “We’re disappointed in the need to take this step, but it is necessary for the long-term health of our league.”
    Phillips said he believes the “agreement will be reached at the bargaining table.”
    But neither side will flinch until a ruling forces them to make concessions.

    Meanwhile, the clock toward the 2011 season is ­counting down. Staffers, assistant coaches and others are paying close attention — while some are already paying the price with wage cuts and furloughs — as rich lawyers, players and owners sort through this collective mess.

  • #6
    Mello Jello soulman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    PEYTON'S PLACE
    Posts
    22,818
    Bear Bucks
    39,510
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    1
    Items Captain Morgan
Gift received at 11-07-2012, 07:28 AM from GermansbombedPH
Message: Better than that soap water guniessTequilla
Gift received at 09-22-2012, 10:24 AM from Riczaj01
Message: downhere in Northern Mexico(aka San Antonio Texas), we tend to share this....not my personal favorite, but I'm definately in the minority.Trophy
Gift received at 01-30-2012, 01:48 PM from Dagan81
Message: Because you're the best God damn poster on this message board!  And, a true friend at that!9599
    This pretty much substantiates what I've been claiming all along. No way, no how do the owners want those books opened to each other let alone the players and the public. Their willingness to toss in the independent third party route was nothing more than a ruse contemplated to get them support when the talks broke down. To me that was a given unless they backed off on their demand that another $1 billion be exmpted from the revenue pile.

    They very intelligently schemed to get through the lockout by collecting the $4 billion in TV money so they could break the back of the union and get their way through economic extortion. Once Judge Doty put an end to that little scheme it leveled the playing field and that as much as anything was the last straw which led to the end of negotiations. Wars always start when each of the combatants perceive they have the upper hand but in reality neither does. Whenever one side is clearly dominant over the other a negotiated peace usually follows. (See Dags, I do know some history, LOL) Such is human nature in those who are not certifiably insane.

    I'll back what Robbie Gould has to say. To me there is no clear evidence that the players wanted this to happen. All of their response has been in answer to the owners manipulation of the facts and refusal to offer either transparency or eliminate their demands that players give up $800 mil that would have belonged to them under the former CBA. Remember it was the owners who chose to opt out of it not the players. On the other hand there are quite a few smoking guns which lay at the feet of the NFL owners if and when anyone cares to pick them up and examine them.

    PS: History thing for Dags based on a different post, not you 54.

  • #7
    Banned dabears54's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    19,172
    Bear Bucks
    13,967
    Post Thanks / Like
    Soul disagree the Owners "schemed" their way about the tv deals, everyone knew what they ddi, they wer not hiding it, and as owners why wouldn't they do that? I know I sure would want to potect my billion dollar investment in the event of a lockout/strike. Seems smart business, same as players that saved monet this year in case no games in Sept.

    And we shall agree to disagree about the union being 'innocent" and not wanting these lawsuits, I do think they wanted them from day 1

  • Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •