No Spare Bears looming on horizon

No Spare Bears looming on horizon


By John Mullin
CSNChicago.com

To answer one very big question right away: No Spare Bears.

The last time there were lost games in the NFL was 1987, when the records show that only one game was lost from a 16-game schedule. But the cost to the Bears was far, far worse.

This current situation, fortunately, is not on track to be a repeat. Lovie Smith will be spared the dilemma that severely hurt Mike Ditka.

“Spare Bears” was a phrase that came into the Chicago sports lexicon when the Bears brought in replacement players for the ones who were walking picket lines. The replacement players around the league included Erik Kramer, later a Bears quarterback; Mike Hohensee, who subsequently coached the Ditka-owned Chicago Rush; and Sean Payton, who went on to coach the New Orleans Saints to a win in last year’s Super Bowl but was a Spare Bear in ’87.

This time is completely different.
The current situation is a lockout. Owner-induced. The 1987 situation was a strike by the Players Association. Games in Week Three were canceled.

But while Buddy Ryan, who’d moved on by then to coach the Philadelphia Eagles, was contemptuous of the replacement players he was handed, Ditka cost himself dearly with his players when he declared, “The real Bears are the ones wearing uniforms on Sunday.”

In fairness to Ditka, he was working for a chief executive (Michael McCaskey) who many believed was looking for a reason to rid himself of Ditka and put his own stamp on the franchise. And Ditka quietly campaigned to have the names of replacement players included in the media guide just like everyone else who wore a Bears uniform.

But his declaration irreparably tore the fabric between his players and him.

“It’s like a marriage,” Dan Hampton told me. “If you find your wife is cheating on you, you can stay together, but it’ll never be the same again.”

The current impasse, with its yet-to-play-out legal machinations, will engender hard and hurt feelings at some levels. But it won’t be a repeat of 1987.

John "Moon" Mullin is CSNChicago.com's Bears Insider, and appears regularly on Bears Postgame Live and Chicago Tribune Live. Follow Moon on Twitter for up-to-the-minute Bears information.

trib ad today:

http://a8.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphot...7_887788_n.jpg

I think all the teams are doing a little PR repair right now. They thnik that by doing this fans will place less blame on them for the lock-out. Pat Bowlen had published in the Denver Post a personal letter he sent to all season ticket holders apologizing somewhat but promising that the labor disagreement will soon end in an agreement.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by soulman

I think all the teams are doing a little PR repair right now. They thnik that by doing this fans will place less blame on them for the lock-out. Pat Bowlen had published in the Denver Post a personal letter he sent to all season ticket holders apologizing somewhat but promising that the labor disagreement will soon end in an agreement.

---

yeah all teams did that Soul.

As said, sick of BOTH SIDES.. and ticked the Union walked way friday, and deadset on court instead of a deal that "could" have been worked out and IMO ultimately will at the same point it would have been if had kept talking. that interview with the NFLPA yesterday posted in the other thread, shows the arrogance and inability to negotiate and just wanted court.. which only feeds the lawyers, not the game for fans.

and maybe just the tader in me, but been keeping an eye on the PSL prices and haven't moved yet, was curious if they would fall in price( still the best investment last 7 years of $500-2,500 anyone made at that time to today..lol).. bottom has the PSl's that have or in process of beign sold

http://bears.seasonticketrights.com/...-Licenses.aspx

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dabears54

yeah all teams did that Soul.

As said, sick of BOTH SIDES.. and ticked the Union walked way friday, and deadset on court instead of a deal that "could" have been worked out and IMO ultimately will at the same point it would have been if had kept talking. that interview with the NFLPA yesterday posted in the other thread, shows the arrogance and inability to negotiate and just wanted court.. which only feeds the lawyers, not the game for fans.

---

It's a shame they couldn't have worked it out at the bargaining table instead of going the court route. I can't believe that anything more will come out of it other than lawyers getting scads of money either because I think it's very likely the courts will just send them back to settle it at the table anyway. The only thing that the players may gain from this is to get an immediate injunction against the lock-out.