-
Bears either ante up or risk losing Mike Mart
Hmm now mulligan on martz?.. really need to hear from teh coaches and not mulligan on this.. will also say not sure WHY a 30th ranked OC, needs a raise from his curernt contract.. seems mully more trying to stir the pot on a booooring offseason with these 2 stories( and martz hasn't said unhappy, just mulligan implying "may" be).. neither story contains a direct quote or even says eitehr unahppy or asking for more.. sounds more and more like mully just stiring a pot for readers
Bears either ante up or risk losing Mike Martz
By Mike Mulligan mmulligan@suntimes.com .hideTime { DISPLAY: none}Apr 26, 2011 04:52AM
The NFL’s economic downturn might be of its own making, but that hasn’t stopped the Bears from offering recession-fueled deals to key members of the coaching staff. Talk about a hare-brained strategy fraught with calamity. Do the Bears ever really think these things out?
A source told the Sun-Times that offensive coordinator Mike Martz, like special-teams coordinator Dave Toub before him, recently turned down a one-year extension offer because it didn’t include a raise. With the draft coming up Thursday and the Bears selecting in the first round, the team ought to be reminded it leveraged its future to get quarterback Jay Cutler. Anything that makes Cutler work is a good thing, be it adding a fresh new offensive lineman or two or locking up the play-caller who helped Cutler achieve his first winning season and first playoff victory.
What happens if Martz, who turns 60 in May, decides he doesn’t need the $1 million he is scheduled to make in 2011. What if he says getting paid like Todd Collins isn’t worth the effort. What if he walks away?
What if he plays out 2011 and then leaves via free agency as Toub could do, too? Why mess with success?
The only staff member who received a significant raise in the offseason was offensive line coach Mike Tice, who only got his deal after being denied permission to interview for an offensive coordinator position.
Even head coach Lovie Smith remains status quo, receiving minimal added compensation on a two-year extension announced a couple months ago. Smith, of course, signed a four-year contract extension the last time he was headed to the final year of his deal after the team’s appearance in Super Bowl XLI.
Smith was the lowest-paid coach in the league at that point and still remains highly compensated, making more than $5 million a year. Notwithstanding, nobody has explained why Smith’s third deal was for half as many years as the last one, or why the coach had his son, Matthew, a second-year law student at Loyola, write the contract. It’s an odd situation.
Martz’s unhappiness with his contract offer is thought-provoking. For the first time in his career, the statistics of his offense did not improve during his first year in control of a team. In fact, the Bears went the wrong way, dropping from 23rd under Ron Turner to 30th in the 32-team NFL under Martz.
But in fairness, Martz didn’t have the weapons needed to run his scheme, starting with major problems on the offensive line that were arguably never resolved. The offensive line certainly lacked continuity until the bye week. Not coincidentally Tice and Martz had a heart-to-heart at that stage and came to an understanding that they couldn’t block up the wide-open, pass-happy system that is the coordinator’s calling card. So the maverick coordinator reeled in his flamboyant tendencies and ran the most balanced offense in the league in terms of run and pass plays, keying a five-game winning streak as part of a 7-2 close to the season.
Apparently subjugation of ego is appreciated during the season, but not rewarded after it. It sends a curious signal to Martz, the mad scientist who was an NFL castoff when the Bears brought him in. His impulse is to spread out at a continually increasing rate the more he’s blitzed. The strategy contributed to a league-high 56 sacks allowed that included 52 on Cutler, who was dropped a league record nine times in the first half against the New York Giants before being knocked out of the game with a concussion.
Cutler also suffered a knee injury in the NFC championship game, making improvement in the offensive line the team’s top offseason priority. The job that Tice did with the group he had is one of the reasons he is a hot coaching property who deserved the raise he received. What about Martz? The Bears reportedly paid him in the $1 million a year range when they gave him a two-year contract last year. They were not bidding for his services and the chance to get back in the league and prove he’s not a rogue coordinator probably meant more to him than the compensation.
Now, he’s proven himself malleable and adaptable as well as intermittently brilliant despite mediocre talent. Now the Bears need him more than he needs them.
Martz has a contract that pays him what a first-time play-caller would make. Here’s hoping the Bears follow Martz’s lead and reconcile an outdated strategy before it’s too late.
Last edited by dabears54; 04-26-2011 at 07:16 AM.
-
-
Man, let's get some guys drafted and get on with FA so Mulligans "sources" will have given him some other info to write about. An article per day on the sad state of the Bears coaching contracts isn't headline news to me. Besides, consider the source. It's the SunTimes for crap sake and Mulligan is nothing more than their new Jay Moron-otti.
Last edited by soulman; 04-26-2011 at 09:31 PM.
I'm getting to that age where a lifetime warranty just doesn't mean as much to me anymore as an afternoon nap.
Honey Badger Don't Care. Honey Badger Don't Give a Shit.
-
High Fives / Like - 1 BEAR DOWN!, 0 Dislikes
-
Junior Member
wow
so, martz says no to mccaskey's low ball tender (trying to squeeze out one more year
at the relatively low price for an OC) and mulligan conjectures martz MAY be upset and
walk out before the season gets started. wow, great journalism. whatever happened to
the concept of checking and verifying with the source. if the source is unavailable,
report the facts and leave the conjecturing to the pundits and fortune-tellers.
-
If martz can make this O look legit, he might be able to find a team stupid enough to hire him as a HC; why take anything but an overpay for OC? If someone wants him that bad; they can have him; I'd perfer not seeing my QB crushed again.
-

Originally Posted by
Houdini
so, martz says no to mccaskey's low ball tender (trying to squeeze out one more year
at the relatively low price for an OC) and mulligan conjectures martz MAY be upset and
walk out before the season gets started. wow, great journalism. whatever happened to
the concept of checking and verifying with the source. if the source is unavailable,
report the facts and leave the conjecturing to the pundits and fortune-tellers.

Don't know how he could come up with that since Martz is under contract for 2011. I've never heard of a coach walking out on his team over a contract offer. To even imply that is absurd. Consider the source; Sun-Times-Mulligan=New Moron-otti. All just a big crap stir if you ask me.
I'm getting to that age where a lifetime warranty just doesn't mean as much to me anymore as an afternoon nap.
Honey Badger Don't Care. Honey Badger Don't Give a Shit.
-
High Fives / Like - 1 BEAR DOWN!, 0 Dislikes
-
what about the Bears resurrecting this re-tread and giving him what was close to being his last shot? where's the loyalty? besides, until this offense can crack the top 15, he aint done what he was brought here to do
-
High Fives / Like - 2 BEAR DOWN!, 0 Dislikes
-

Originally Posted by
Houdini
so, martz says no to mccaskey's low ball tender (trying to squeeze out one more year
at the relatively low price for an OC) and mulligan conjectures martz MAY be upset and
walk out before the season gets started. wow, great journalism. whatever happened to
the concept of checking and verifying with the source. if the source is unavailable,
report the facts and leave the conjecturing to the pundits and fortune-tellers.
exactly, its AWFUL journalism.. but as we see "some" do fall for it, and immediately 'fall in line" with the old and wrong adage "bears cheap".. which of course was the purpose, despite no truth to it.. as PT barnum used to say.. " you can fool some of the people, all the time"
And the much more logical conclusion, was bears trying to get the whole staff on same year, as to why even offered one more year, despite already under contract
-
I see Tice as our future OC anyways. I think he was the one who took over the offense last season after Martz was trying to pass us out of the playoffs
-
High Fives / Like - 1 BEAR DOWN!, 0 Dislikes
-
21st in points, 30th in yards, and we're FUCKING LOWBALLING HIM? Hey buddy, there's the door, if you don't quit lowballing the opposing defense, see your way to it.
-
High Fives / Like - 3 BEAR DOWN!, 0 Dislikes
-

Originally Posted by
Henry Burris
21st in points, 30th in yards, and we're FUCKING LOWBALLING HIM? Hey buddy, there's the door, if you don't quit lowballing the opposing defense, see your way to it.
Funny how people act as if he was exponentially better then what we previously had; when he was worse at it; w/more weapons(the o line has been bad for years, don't tell me that was his reason for being worse then RT). And it would have been worse if Lovie and Co' hadn't neutered him mid way through the season to make him balance the attack better. Guy shouldn't be in extension talks to begin with...it should be why the F should we give you another year to try and kill Cutler?
-
High Fives / Like - 1 BEAR DOWN!, 0 Dislikes