Thread: Carimi is a Bear!!

[QUOTE=GeorgiaJeff;807740][QUOTE=soulman;807736]I never said the Bears didn't need a top notch LT (never use the term "franchise" for an Olineman).

I knowq you didn't. I had replied to a dabears54 post.

Jeff never said that, and as a matter of fact had Carimi as the bears pick in this draft- like Soul,, all ever said was w/o tommie getting a "3" as important as a LT to the bears team... and depending on WHO was there, can see a DT taken ahead of a OT with the other position taken at #62.. been very consistant about that..

My final mock:

1. OTCamiri/wilkerson( whoever falls.. and add in costonza)

2. DT nevis/Carpenter( the opposite position of round 1)

3. CB- ras dowling( or little if still there, which doubt)

4. LB- Nate irving

5. WR- ausitin pettis

6. BPA- Guard/center

7. BPA period

[QUOTE=dabears54;807744][QUOTE=GeorgiaJeff;807740]

Originally Posted by soulman

I never said the Bears didn't need a top notch LT (never use the term "franchise" for an Olineman).

Jeff never said that, and as a matter of fact had Carimi as the bears pick in this draft- like Soul,, all ever said was w/o tommie getting a "3" as important as a LT to the bears team... and depending on WHO was there, can see a DT taken ahead of a OT with the other position taken at #62.. been very consistant about that..

My final mock:

1. OTCamiri/wilkerson( whoever falls.. and add in costonza)

2. DT nevis/Carpenter( the opposite position of round 1)

3. CB- ras dowling( or little if still there, which doubt)

4. LB- Nate irving

5. WR- ausitin pettis

6. BPA- Guard/center

7. BPA period

Perhaps I misundersttod what you said. A while back I said I wanted Carimi or Sherrod and said they would be franchise left tackles. I thought you said something to the affect of "teams do not have to have a franchise left tackle to be successful." Again, I have have misunderstood what you said.

Anyway, I'm glad you like the Carimi pick.