Facebook Twitter

Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 58

Thread: Mullin's best bears Top three QB's-who ya got

  1. #21
    Semiautomatic Assault Admin loki520's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Yokosuka, Japan
    Posts
    19,950
    Bear Bucks
    140,069
    Trophies
    Post Thanks / Like
    Items Beer Me!
Gift received at 08-26-2012, 07:32 PM from soulman
Message: Bottoms UpBeer Me!
Gift received at 11-08-2011, 06:36 AM from JC23JC23Band-Aid
Gift received at 10-18-2011, 08:50 PM from 4th and 26
Message: Here is the bandaid that Obama used on the economyUsername Bold
Gift received at 05-01-2011, 09:39 PM from JC23JC23Username Bold
Gift received at 02-01-2011, 11:48 PM from BigClaws
    Quote Originally Posted by GlobeOfFrogs View Post
    He wasn't. Jake was the Kevin Kolb of 2001, we went the Grossman rout instead. I still think the Panthers got a steal, but most Bears fans(one in particular that is pretending not to read this) wanted Kordell Stewart because he was "proven".

    .
    ┌∩┐(◣_◢)┌∩┐

    America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards." - Claire Wolfe
    "Possibly, but it's not to early to start loading ammo!" - Loki




  2. BEAR DOWN! soulman say BEAR DOWN!
  • #22
    Specialist Henry Burris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    15,492
    Bear Bucks
    17,750
    Post Thanks / Like
    Items Trophy
Gift received at 11-03-2011, 03:39 PM from JC23JC23Bears Head Logo
Gift received at 11-02-2011, 07:50 PM from JC23JC23Pitcher O Beer!
Gift received at 10-30-2011, 04:47 PM from GermansbombedPHUsername Bold
Gift received at 05-16-2011, 12:54 PM from BearStuffUsername Bold
Gift received at 03-01-2011, 09:34 AM from dabears54
    Dag, 2 points:

    1.) For his time, yeah Luckman may have been the best, but no way he'd make the Bears roster today, nor would Bradshaw make the Steelers, and as far as winning = better, Tom Brady(winning drive against the Rams) and Joe Montana(beating the Cowboys in the NFCC; the drive against the Bengals) both came to prominence with clutch performances in the big game, which if you're up 73-0, I don't think really matters, but it's apples and oranges, i suppose.

    2.) Completely forgot about Jim Harbaugh, I think with a better coach, he would've made a better dent with the Bears (seeing how he was one pass away from a SB with the Colts)


  • #23
    Banned dabears54's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    19,172
    Bear Bucks
    13,967
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Henry Burris View Post
    No way any of them would be stars today. Babe ruth was 230 something and fat. He wouldnt make a triple a team today. They were good for their time, but with workout routines and medicine, surgery and nutrition the way it is, thy simply would not be. Like soulman said, different eras...but to say 4 championships in 6 years is amazing, well, he wasnt the most important cog, and if he had an equivelant, it'd be terry bradshaw, a qb who happened to be on the right team.. anyhoo, thats just my opinion, and if we had any real success at qb, he wouldnt even be in the discussion.
    and that's my point henry- ruth wouldn't be "fat" in today's game - he would have had trainer's personal chef's etc and e would ahve been a buff 215 hitting machine.. and really do no gt the "not an important gog" stuff... Sid and hennessy invetned the "T-formation" and he was BY FAR THE MOST IMPRTANT GOG in that, he was the first Qb that ahd to read a "D" decide to pass or throw the ball, and w/o his football smarts and reading the "D", the "t-formation" fails miserbly( and for proof of that look at the non titles won for 15 years afte side retired, when other Qb's tried running it. ). Sid is an all time great ad not sure who you think was a more mportant gog on those 1940's teams, please tell me, thanks!

  • #24
    Banned dabears54's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    19,172
    Bear Bucks
    13,967
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by soulman View Post
    Let's just say, as you point out, that in their respective eras they were the top guys in the game. But what Luckman accomplished in the 40's he could not have duplicated in the 70's. Both were surrounded by very dominant teams but I still don't think many give Luckman credit for being as good an athlete as he was. He was an All-American RB in college trained to play in a wing-style backfield but he metamorphosed quite nicely into a very good t-formation QB. He wasn't the Bears only weapon but he was a weapon.

    Who knows how many more SB's the 80's Bears may have won had McMahon stayed healthy. As a pure passer there are quite a few Bears QB's who would pass him up but he was a great leader and he knew how to win. It was his intangibles that made him special and maybe it was the same with Sid Luckman although I never saw him play.
    Yeah soul- sid was a great athlete( remember played 2 ways back then), and while hard to compare era's.. do not think its fair to just dismiss the older athlete's because not as big as today's.. I'd say bronk, would have been a 250-260 wrecking ball ala a earl campbell if played today, with modern training and nutrition,, he wouldn't be just 230 anymore,and would be a bast to pull down.. yes the gme and sizes have changed, but those athelte's would ahve changed also .. so that is why hard to make comparsions, but do not think fair" just to dismiss becuae smaller or not as strong. I mean if luckman or bronk could ahve trained all yeara round, instead o needing jobs in the Offseason to make ends meet, how mch better and bigger would they have been?

  • #25
    Member GeorgiaJeff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    319
    Bear Bucks
    3,558
    Post Thanks / Like
    DaBears54, it was 4 titles in 7 years, not 6. You count 1940 as year 1 and 1946 as year 7...

    1940
    1941
    1943
    1946

  • #26
    Button your face 4th and 26's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    37,070
    Bear Bucks
    25,967
    Trophies
    Post Thanks / Like
    Items Pacifier
Gift received at 10-21-2011, 01:29 PM from BigClaws
Message: Suck it.Jack Daniels
Gift received at 10-18-2011, 08:48 PM from loki520Username Bold
Gift received at 04-18-2011, 10:09 PM from Dagan81Username BoldUsername Bold
    Quote Originally Posted by The Benjamin View Post
    Luckman-obviously
    McMahon-Won a Super Bowl
    Grossman- Made a Super Bowl
    McMahon played on the team that sported the greatest RB and Defense that won a superbowl. His numbers that year not average at best. Grossman, Orton or Dilfer would have won a superbowl if they played qb for that team.

    Honest opinion, Luckman is the best qb we have ever had and that is it. Jay has talent but he has not played enough games to make this list like most of our qbs of the past.

  • BEAR DOWN! soulman say BEAR DOWN!
  • #27
    Dent 4 HoF gammabears's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    8,595
    Bear Bucks
    14,545
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    4
    Items 546Bears Head LogoDick ButkusWalter Payton
    Quote Originally Posted by loki520 View Post
    I seriously need to make a wallpaper out of that image. Hahahaha. Epic.


    Anyway, here's my top 3.

    1. Luckman (I don't care what anyone else thinks. He certainly got the job for the Bears)
    2. McMahon
    3. Cutler/Kramer
    Last edited by gammabears; 05-22-2011 at 03:04 PM.

  • #28
    Banned dabears54's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    19,172
    Bear Bucks
    13,967
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by GeorgiaJeff View Post
    DaBears54, it was 4 titles in 7 years, not 6. You count 1940 as year 1 and 1946 as year 7...

    1940
    1941
    1943
    1946
    thanks.. yeah its 7..but still a remarkable run( esp as 1942 were 11-0 and didnt win the title..lol)

  • #29
    Senior Member Riczaj01's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    San Antonio Tx, Originally Fort Wayne, IN.
    Posts
    14,546
    Bear Bucks
    45,711
    Post Thanks / Like
    Items Pitcher O Beer!
Gift received at 09-21-2012, 11:42 PM from soulman
Message: Here's a whole pitcher of it but you'll have to drink most of it.  I'm a light hitter.  HahaDaBearz MascotDaBears MascotBears CBears Head Logo
    Quote Originally Posted by Henry Burris View Post
    I

    Good point. I'm just going off the fact that players from so long ago really dont have the same talent as even players with only one or two good years these days, which is why i wouldnt pick luckman over my guys
    It's not fair to judge them. If Babe Ruth was playing today he wouldn't have been 250 and fat. He would have been groomed and in better shape at a much earlier age, had designer steroids thrown at him at 13 yrs old and probably been 250 all muscle, he would have had swing coaches etc helping him out. Also there was no push to be in shape year round like it is today, Your greats today are not going to be 250 all muscle if their born in at the turn of the century. Not to mention how the rules have changed.

    I'd say most of the guys today couldn't have made it back then; they would have a far harder time staying healthy; Montana/Marino/Manning/Brady are not the same qb's in the 40's/70's as they are today b/c the rules didn't allow guys to throw like that. QB's weren't protected in the pocket, and wr's could get mauled all the way down the field.


    My top three Luckman, Jimmy Mac, Kramer(who will eventually be replaced by Cutler if all goes well).

  • BEAR DOWN! dabears54 say BEAR DOWN!
  • #30
    Banned dabears54's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    19,172
    Bear Bucks
    13,967
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Riczaj01 View Post
    It's not fair to judge them. If Babe Ruth was playing today he wouldn't have been 250 and fat. He would have been groomed and in better shape at a much earlier age, had designer steroids thrown at him at 13 yrs old and probably been 250 all muscle, he would have had swing coaches etc helping him out. Also there was no push to be in shape year round like it is today, Your greats today are not going to be 250 all muscle if their born in at the turn of the century. Not to mention how the rules have changed.

    I'd say most of the guys today couldn't have made it back then; they would have a far harder time staying healthy; Montana/Marino/Manning/Brady are not the same qb's in the 40's/70's as they are today b/c the rules didn't allow guys to throw like that. QB's weren't protected in the pocket, and wr's could get mauled all the way down the field.


    My top three Luckman, Jimmy Mac, Kramer(who will eventually be replaced by Cutler if all goes well).
    Spot on and will say, "IF" cutler gets ring , he leapfrogs mcmahon right away

  • Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •