Thread: kruetz 9th ranked center in 2010

Originally Posted by dabears54

exactly, I don't beleive kreutz was that high, nor do I beleive the tackles that low..which is why didn't post the rest or bother, The more read the metrics more made less sense and more saw top probowl players at bootm and people "most think didn't play well at top. more question BOTH the "good" and "bad".

Its soemtimes the problem with this stuff.. stats can be bent alot of different ways.. and just see too many 'good" players ranked bad and bad players ranked good, to put too much into this sites metrics, the more I'm researching it

How about the ones on Knox? I assumed you agreed with these and that was why they were posted

Originally Posted by The Benjamin

How about the ones on Knox? I assumed you agreed with these and that was why they were posted

that one had jennings, wayne, megatron, wallace, d.jackson as the top deep threats, passes the "eye test", of being a legit ranking as those looked like the best.. has nothing to do with knox( sorry to tke that lame idea away from you).. these "O" rankings as said don't seem to pass that same 'eye test"

Originally Posted by dabears54

that one had jennings, wayne, megatron, wallace, d.jackson as the top deep threats, passes the "eye test", of being a legit ranking as those looked like the best.. has nothing to do with knox( sorry to tke that lame idea away from you).. these "O" rankings as said don't seem to pass that same 'eye test"

lame idea? what lame idea would this be then? I was asking a question based on you saying this author of these pieces was not as good as once thought. And since he did that piece and the Bennett piece I was asking if you thought those fell in the same area as these do.

Originally Posted by The Benjamin

lame idea? what lame idea would this be then? I was asking a question based on you saying this author of these pieces was not as good as once thought. And since he did that piece and the Bennett piece I was asking if you thought those fell in the same area as these do.

actually the "bennett" piece was done by ESPN and just had to do with 'drops".. not any metrics or multiple stats rolled into one as the "cold hard facts" sites does... and just saying "one stats site" doesn't fit all.. despite unfort these sites having a bad tendancy to do this... Do you really think pouncey is the 28th ranked center in league? seriously? of that david deihl, marshall yanda, davin joseph anf oher, also amoung the 5 WORST at thir positions? I sure do not.. so 'something" is amiss when comes to line rankings don't you think?.. has *NOTHING* to do with how they ranked bear players

Originally Posted by dabears54

actually the "bennett" piece was done by ESPN and just had to do with 'drops".. not any metrics or multiple stats rolled into one as the "cold hard facts" sites does... and just saying "one stats site" doesn't fit all.. despite unfort these sites having a bad tendancy to do this... Do you really think pouncey is the 28th ranked center in league? seriously? of that david deihl, marshall yanda, davin joseph anf oher, also amoung the 5 WORST at thir positions? I sure do not.. so 'something" is amiss when comes to line rankings don't you think?.. has *NOTHING* to do with how they ranked bear players

Again, I posted the articles you left off. I posted them because I thought you trusted and agreed with the rankings they provided.

Originally Posted by The Benjamin

Again, I posted the articles you left off. I posted them because I thought you trusted and agreed with the rankings they provided.

well that was a wrong assumption : )

Originally Posted by dabears54

well that was a wrong assumption : )

So you do not agree with the rankings then?

Originally Posted by The Benjamin

So you do not agree with the rankings then?

??? haven't you been reading my last few responses?

actually the "bennett" piece was done by ESPN and just had to do with 'drops".. not any metrics or multiple stats rolled into one as the "cold hard facts" sites does... and just saying "one stats site" doesn't fit all.. despite unfort these sites having a bad tendancy to do this... Do you really think pouncey is the 28th ranked center in league? seriously? of that david deihl, marshall yanda, davin joseph anf oher, also amoung the 5 WORST at thir positions? I sure do not.. so 'something" is amiss when comes to line rankings don't you think?.. has *NOTHING* to do with how they ranked bear players

exactly, I don't beleive kreutz was that high, nor do I beleive the tackles that low..which is why didn't post the rest or bother, The more read the metrics more made less sense and more saw top probowl players at bootm and people "most think didn't play well at top. more question BOTH the "good" and "bad".

Its soemtimes the problem with this stuff.. stats can be bent alot of different ways.. and just see too many 'good" players ranked bad and bad players ranked good, to put too much into this sites metrics, the more I'm researching it