Facebook Twitter

Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 45

Thread: BEST ALL TIME BEARS WR's.. Who ya got?

  1. #11
    World Series Dreaming
    The Benjamin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Schaumburg, IL
    Posts
    42,032
    Bear Bucks
    6,505
    Post Thanks / Like
    Items 46Gale SayersWalter PaytonTrophy
Gift received at 10-18-2011, 08:55 PM from 4th and 26
Message: Here to the FF champ.  lolUsername Bold
Gift received at 06-22-2011, 02:03 PM from soulman
    Quote Originally Posted by dabears54 View Post
    personally i don't find the the world's greatest football player ever to be "pathetic", or that payton leads the team in receptions.. FWIW 493 catches, i'd wager would be close to near the top of alot teams.. its ok to not always knock the bears
    I did not say Walter was pathetic. I said our WR history was pathetic.

    Who always knocks the Bears DB

  2. BEAR DOWN! Henry Burris say BEAR DOWN!
  • #12
    Specialist Henry Burris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    15,540
    Bear Bucks
    18,099
    Post Thanks / Like
    Items Trophy
Gift received at 11-03-2011, 03:39 PM from JC23JC23Bears Head Logo
Gift received at 11-02-2011, 07:50 PM from JC23JC23Pitcher O Beer!
Gift received at 10-30-2011, 04:47 PM from GermansbombedPHUsername Bold
Gift received at 05-16-2011, 12:54 PM from BearStuffUsername Bold
Gift received at 03-01-2011, 09:34 AM from dabears54
    On that point, I agree with you, Benj. We've not had "great" wrs, and traded our last pro bowler for a DE that went gradually downhill with us....


  • #13
    Junior Member thekmann's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    152
    Bear Bucks
    1,641
    Post Thanks / Like
    I think your list is well thought out DB and I really can't knock any of it except for me I would put Conway in at least the number 5 spot just based on his potential alone. It wasn't his fault that the Bears had total crap for QB's while he was playing and then of course the offensive coordinators he had to play for...... I think had he been drafted by any other team but the Bears he most likely would have had a brilliant career but that's just my opinion.

  • #14
    Banned dabears54's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    19,172
    Bear Bucks
    13,967
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by thekmann View Post
    I think your list is well thought out DB and I really can't knock any of it except for me I would put Conway in at least the number 5 spot just based on his potential alone. It wasn't his fault that the Bears had total crap for QB's while he was playing and then of course the offensive coordinators he had to play for...... I think had he been drafted by any other team but the Bears he most likely would have had a brilliant career but that's just my opinion.
    Good point K-mann, and that's the hard part sometimes in evaluating WR's.. because alot of their production is dependant on the QB.. So sometimes hard to Separate the two- or how good a WR would ahve been with a better Qb and/or OC. Curtis looked good in 1994-96 when Krammer was playing well, so do agree , could have been higher with a better Qb and OC... but then again with the exception of Sid and hill, that is something all WR's on bears have had to deal with- so don't think that makes a difference in the rankings. The idea the marcus robsinon was able to put up 1,400 yards with cade fricken mcclown.. to me still one of the most remarkable football achievements ever..lol

  • #15
    King of Rants GrizzlyBear91's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Illinois.
    Posts
    13,521
    Bear Bucks
    18,389
    Post Thanks / Like
    Favorite: Curtis Conway
    Best individual season: Marcus Robinson
    Best Career with Bears: Willie Gault.

  • #16
    Mello Jello soulman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    PEYTON'S PLACE
    Posts
    22,832
    Bear Bucks
    39,611
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    1
    Items Captain Morgan
Gift received at 11-07-2012, 07:28 AM from GermansbombedPH
Message: Better than that soap water guniessTequilla
Gift received at 09-22-2012, 10:24 AM from Riczaj01
Message: downhere in Northern Mexico(aka San Antonio Texas), we tend to share this....not my personal favorite, but I'm definately in the minority.Trophy
Gift received at 01-30-2012, 01:48 PM from Dagan81
Message: Because you're the best God damn poster on this message board!  And, a true friend at that!9599
    Quote Originally Posted by GeorgiaJeff View Post
    Dennis McKinnon deserves Honorable Mention.
    I'd agree with you Jeff. Willie Gault was the flash and fire in that mid 80's offense but Dennis McKinnon was a far more reliable and better all around WR than Gault. I put him up there with Neal Anderson as one of the most underappreciated Bears of the 80's.

    I'd have to rank Harlon Hill as the best all time WR the Bears ever had and lump him in with Ken Kavanaugh as tops in the pre 60's era. Dick Gordon was very underrated as a Bears wideout. He and Johnny Morris were RB's in college who became top notch WR's in their day although Morris was not the deep threat that Gordon was. Morris was more of a flanker and much like an Earl Bennett, very dependable.

    Conway and Graham get the nod for the best pass catching tandem we ever fielded but once again the lack of an adequate QB after Kramer was lost kind of ended their best days. I like Marty Booker and Bobby Engram as great posession type guys who could always be counted on for the tough catches but that's always the story with the Bears. With few exceptions our best WR's have tended to be #2 type posessions guys and not great downfield threats. Those speedsters that we did have like Gordon, Gault and Conway has relatively few top productive years with the Bears before either getting injured (Gordon and Robinson) or moving on to new teams (Gault and Conway). Maybe Johnny Knox can break that mold for us. He's done an incredible job in just two years for a smallish guy and once he learns his routes better and they get him the ball in the right way I think he has the potential to become the #1 type of guy that Hester never could.
    I'm getting to that age where a lifetime warranty just doesn't mean as much to me anymore as an afternoon nap.



    Honey Badger Don't Care. Honey Badger Don't Give a Shit.


  • #17
    Banned dabears54's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    19,172
    Bear Bucks
    13,967
    Post Thanks / Like
    Soul , think mckinnon, engram and now bennett all in the same 'class" of under-appreciated WR's,, but think both Engram and looks like bennett will be a step above mckinnon, as said only had 2 season's of even 500 yards and none 710+yards.. engram did much better and already bennett has 561 and 717 yards... so think he will pass by Mckinnon soon also

  • #18
    Mello Jello soulman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    PEYTON'S PLACE
    Posts
    22,832
    Bear Bucks
    39,611
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    1
    Items Captain Morgan
Gift received at 11-07-2012, 07:28 AM from GermansbombedPH
Message: Better than that soap water guniessTequilla
Gift received at 09-22-2012, 10:24 AM from Riczaj01
Message: downhere in Northern Mexico(aka San Antonio Texas), we tend to share this....not my personal favorite, but I'm definately in the minority.Trophy
Gift received at 01-30-2012, 01:48 PM from Dagan81
Message: Because you're the best God damn poster on this message board!  And, a true friend at that!9599
    Quote Originally Posted by dabears54 View Post
    Soul , think mckinnon, engram and now bennett all in the same 'class" of under-appreciated WR's,, but think both Engram and looks like bennett will be a step above mckinnon, as said only had 2 season's of even 500 yards and none 710+yards.. engram did much better and already bennett has 561 and 717 yards... so think he will pass by Mckinnon soon also
    That may be true in terms of yardage but he's was as effective for a few years as either Engram or Bennett. There's also the fact that both Engram and Bennett were fairly high picks (both 3rd I believe) and McKinnon made the team as a FA and didn't get a chance to shine right away. He was playing behind James Scott and Ricky Watts before that I think. There was also Baschnagel and Margerum (Mac's boy) to contend with. I've just always liked the guy for both his play and his consistency.

    I think Earl Bennett will eventually be one of the most effective WR's we've ever had. We finally have a great QB and a pass oriented OC and Cutler has played quite a bit with him and trusts him to be where he's supposed to be when he's supposed to be. It wouldn't surprise me at all to seem him become the Bears Hines Ward.
    I'm getting to that age where a lifetime warranty just doesn't mean as much to me anymore as an afternoon nap.



    Honey Badger Don't Care. Honey Badger Don't Give a Shit.


  • #19
    Banned dabears54's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    19,172
    Bear Bucks
    13,967
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by soulman View Post
    That may be true in terms of yardage but he's was as effective for a few years as either Engram or Bennett. There's also the fact that both Engram and Bennett were fairly high picks (both 3rd I believe) and McKinnon made the team as a FA and didn't get a chance to shine right away. He was playing behind James Scott and Ricky Watts before that I think. There was also Baschnagel and Margerum (Mac's boy) to contend with. I've just always liked the guy for both his play and his consistency.

    I think Earl Bennett will eventually be one of the most effective WR's we've ever had. We finally have a great QB and a pass oriented OC and Cutler has played quite a bit with him and trusts him to be where he's supposed to be when he's supposed to be. It wouldn't surprise me at all to seem him become the Bears Hines Ward.
    Don't get me wrong, I'm a fan of both mckinnon and back then "pinky" gentry for "specilaized' plays and getting the 3rd downs when needed, and agree they def. go underapprecited in history- just saying also think engram and now bennett are ALSO underappreciated in those same roles, but do it better( and the stats back that up).. So when doing a "ranking", just feel both are higher up in he ranking than mckinnon

  • #20
    Mello Jello soulman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    PEYTON'S PLACE
    Posts
    22,832
    Bear Bucks
    39,611
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    1
    Items Captain Morgan
Gift received at 11-07-2012, 07:28 AM from GermansbombedPH
Message: Better than that soap water guniessTequilla
Gift received at 09-22-2012, 10:24 AM from Riczaj01
Message: downhere in Northern Mexico(aka San Antonio Texas), we tend to share this....not my personal favorite, but I'm definately in the minority.Trophy
Gift received at 01-30-2012, 01:48 PM from Dagan81
Message: Because you're the best God damn poster on this message board!  And, a true friend at that!9599
    That's why I hate ranking guys based on all time stats especially guys who I haven't even seen play. I know how hard it may be for some of the younger guys to appreciate even the 80's Bears when many of them never saw them play. With me it's the same with WR's like Hill and Kavanaugh. All I know of them is their legends and there are also so many variables to consider. Like how much better would Dick Gordon's stats have been if he hadn't had guys like Nix, Concannon and Douglass throwing to him?

    I like to eyeball these guys and think about the impact they had on the Bears teams of their era. To me it's more than just stats and I think that, for instance, Dennis McKinnon was a bigger difference maker for the 80's Bears than Bobby Engram was for the 90's early 00's Bears even though Engram had better stats.

    Matter of opinion. Just the difference in the way we look at it.
    I'm getting to that age where a lifetime warranty just doesn't mean as much to me anymore as an afternoon nap.



    Honey Badger Don't Care. Honey Badger Don't Give a Shit.


  • Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •