Facebook Twitter

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 21

Thread: Olsen confident offense will make improve

  1. #11
    Yankee Doodle Dandy Dagan81's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Knoxville (Powell), TN
    Posts
    15,688
    Bear Bucks
    43,624
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    5
    Items DaBearz Mascot
Gift received at 08-26-2012, 07:39 AM from ZifanQ
Message: It worked! Here you go buddy! 
Cheers for the answersOld Style
Gift received at 05-15-2012, 10:16 PM from short faced bear
Message: It's not rep but hey it's beerBeer Me!
Gift received at 01-29-2012, 10:01 PM from soulman
Message: Consider yourself beered.Beer Me!
Gift received at 01-29-2012, 09:59 PM from BearJimKeg
Gift received at 10-21-2011, 07:39 AM from Bear Goggles
Message: Beer'd
    Quote Originally Posted by The Benjamin View Post
    2005 we had a much better offense than in 2010

    You forget we had the 30th best offense last year.
    1) Chicago Bears in 2005: 29th in total offense (4,101 total - 2,002 yards passing; 2,099 yards rushing - 125.1 passing yards per game; 131.2 rushing yards per game); 26th in scoring offense (260 points @ 16.3 ppg)

    2) Chicago Bears in 2010: 30th in total offense (4,631 total - 3,015 yards passing; 1,616 yards rushing - 188.4 passing yards per game; 101 rushing yards per game); 21st in scoring offense (334 points @ 20.9 ppg)

    I believe that your assertion is wrong, Benji.

  • #12
    World Series Dreaming
    The Benjamin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Schaumburg, IL
    Posts
    42,032
    Bear Bucks
    6,505
    Post Thanks / Like
    Items 46Gale SayersWalter PaytonTrophy
Gift received at 10-18-2011, 08:55 PM from 4th and 26
Message: Here to the FF champ.  lolUsername Bold
Gift received at 06-22-2011, 02:03 PM from soulman
    Quote Originally Posted by Dagan81 View Post
    1) Chicago Bears in 2005: 29th in total offense (4,101 total - 2,002 yards passing; 2,099 yards rushing - 125.1 passing yards per game; 131.2 rushing yards per game); 26th in scoring offense (260 points @ 16.3 ppg)

    2) Chicago Bears in 2010: 30th in total offense (4,631 total - 3,015 yards passing; 1,616 yards rushing - 188.4 passing yards per game; 101 rushing yards per game); 21st in scoring offense (334 points @ 20.9 ppg)

    I believe that your assertion is wrong, Benji.
    I stand partially corrected.

    However
    2005 29th
    2010 30th

    I know, semantics, but all the same we were ranked worse ;)

  • #13
    Mello Jello soulman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    PEYTON'S PLACE
    Posts
    22,832
    Bear Bucks
    39,611
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    1
    Items Captain Morgan
Gift received at 11-07-2012, 07:28 AM from GermansbombedPH
Message: Better than that soap water guniessTequilla
Gift received at 09-22-2012, 10:24 AM from Riczaj01
Message: downhere in Northern Mexico(aka San Antonio Texas), we tend to share this....not my personal favorite, but I'm definately in the minority.Trophy
Gift received at 01-30-2012, 01:48 PM from Dagan81
Message: Because you're the best God damn poster on this message board!  And, a true friend at that!9599
    Quote Originally Posted by Blue Horse-shoe View Post
    Does this mean Olsens' blocking is going to improve also ? Gee that'd be nice.
    He did improve a lot last year over the year before. So much so that Martz actually had him lining up a a FB on some plays in place of Manu. Olsen will never make anyone's all-pro blocker team but he's still one of the best pass catching weapons we've got.
    I'm getting to that age where a lifetime warranty just doesn't mean as much to me anymore as an afternoon nap.



    Honey Badger Don't Care. Honey Badger Don't Give a Shit.


  • #14
    Senior Member Blue Horse-shoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    South suburbs
    Posts
    1,703
    Bear Bucks
    13,101
    Post Thanks / Like
    Items Old StyleBears C57Brian Piccolo6
    Quote Originally Posted by soulman View Post
    He did improve a lot last year over the year before. So much so that Martz actually had him lining up a a FB on some plays in place of Manu. Olsen will never make anyone's all-pro blocker team but he's still one of the best pass catching weapons we've got.
    Replacing Manu doesn't impress me cuz Manu blows. I agree with the pass catching thought.
    What should you call any : Fumble , Hold , Interception , Three and out , or Sack ?

    A " F.H.I.T.S " ? or a J'Marcus ?

  • #15
    Mello Jello soulman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    PEYTON'S PLACE
    Posts
    22,832
    Bear Bucks
    39,611
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    1
    Items Captain Morgan
Gift received at 11-07-2012, 07:28 AM from GermansbombedPH
Message: Better than that soap water guniessTequilla
Gift received at 09-22-2012, 10:24 AM from Riczaj01
Message: downhere in Northern Mexico(aka San Antonio Texas), we tend to share this....not my personal favorite, but I'm definately in the minority.Trophy
Gift received at 01-30-2012, 01:48 PM from Dagan81
Message: Because you're the best God damn poster on this message board!  And, a true friend at that!9599
    Quote Originally Posted by Blue Horse-shoe View Post
    Replacing Manu doesn't impress me cuz Manu blows. I agree with the pass catching thought.
    What they need to do this year is to take him out of periodically replacing Manu at FB and keep him at TE or HB. If Manu doen't play better than he did last year we should be looking at a guy like Lance Louis as a possible replacement. Martz wants an offensive lineman size FB for blocking purposes so Louis fits that description. He played some TE in college so it's not as if he has no abilites to pick up a FB assignments if they give him a chance.

    The guy that should have been alternating with Manu last year was Des Clark but for whatever reason they chose to keep him inactive most of the year and this year he's not likely to return. I don't really think Davis is the guy we need playing FB either and Unga is more of a power RB than a blocking FB so there's Manu, Eddie Williams, and possibly Louis to compete for the spot.

    Olsen is far too good a pass catcher and downfield threat to be using in a blocking back role. Hopefully Martz will recognize that and make a change. He has said he intends to throw to Olsen more this year.
    I'm getting to that age where a lifetime warranty just doesn't mean as much to me anymore as an afternoon nap.



    Honey Badger Don't Care. Honey Badger Don't Give a Shit.


  • #16
    World Series Dreaming
    The Benjamin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Schaumburg, IL
    Posts
    42,032
    Bear Bucks
    6,505
    Post Thanks / Like
    Items 46Gale SayersWalter PaytonTrophy
Gift received at 10-18-2011, 08:55 PM from 4th and 26
Message: Here to the FF champ.  lolUsername Bold
Gift received at 06-22-2011, 02:03 PM from soulman
    Either they over estimated how good he was at blocking
    or
    They underestimated how truly bad the offensive line was and that he would have little impact

    Personally, I say a mix of the two

  • #17
    Senior Member Blue Horse-shoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    South suburbs
    Posts
    1,703
    Bear Bucks
    13,101
    Post Thanks / Like
    Items Old StyleBears C57Brian Piccolo6
    Quote Originally Posted by soulman View Post
    What they need to do this year is to take him out of periodically replacing Manu at FB and keep him at TE or HB. If Manu doen't play better than he did last year we should be looking at a guy like Lance Louis as a possible replacement. Martz wants an offensive lineman size FB for blocking purposes so Louis fits that description. He played some TE in college so it's not as if he has no abilites to pick up a FB assignments if they give him a chance.

    The guy that should have been alternating with Manu last year was Des Clark but for whatever reason they chose to keep him inactive most of the year and this year he's not likely to return. I don't really think Davis is the guy we need playing FB either and Unga is more of a power RB than a blocking FB so there's Manu, Eddie Williams, and possibly Louis to compete for the spot.

    Olsen is far too good a pass catcher and downfield threat to be using in a blocking back role. Hopefully Martz will recognize that and make a change. He has said he intends to throw to Olsen more this year.
    If Manu being in there = a running play 85% of the time, it's too predictable for defenses. If he was more effective I wouldn't care so much because they still have to stop the play. But when he's ineffective , these plays seem like a waste of time. I know he's not the only one blocking so it isn't all on him, but when he's the big tip off that it's a running play ...... either he better get better, or Martz needs to be more creative and cross teams up so they have more to think about. Guys can have rebound years , but if he plays the same way this year he's a waste of space. Here's to hoping he has a better year ( If he makes the team ). The running game HAS to get better this year. If it doesn't, it puts too much pressure on Cutler and the defense to carry this team. I think the emphasis in camp should be on the running game (a bit) more than the passing game.
    What should you call any : Fumble , Hold , Interception , Three and out , or Sack ?

    A " F.H.I.T.S " ? or a J'Marcus ?

  • #18
    Senior Member short faced bear's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    9,206
    Bear Bucks
    43,462
    Post Thanks / Like
    Items DaBearz MascotTrophy4699Dick Butkus
Gift received at 02-04-2012, 11:13 PM from Dagan81
Message: I bestow upon you the gift of the world's greatest linebacker!
    Manu should be gone period. The FB position should not be filled by sub-par blockers like Olsen. Eddie Williams, Louis, Tu'ufo'ou (if he tries out again) and even Unga are a better option. The O line gets flak and rightfully so but the team needs good blocking from both the TE and FB position especially if there is going to be a dramatic improvement in offensive production or reduce the qb hits.
    Arguing on the internet is like winning the special olympics, even if you win your still messed up.

    Restore the roar!

  • BEAR DOWN! Blue Horse-shoe say BEAR DOWN!
  • #19
    Mello Jello soulman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    PEYTON'S PLACE
    Posts
    22,832
    Bear Bucks
    39,611
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    1
    Items Captain Morgan
Gift received at 11-07-2012, 07:28 AM from GermansbombedPH
Message: Better than that soap water guniessTequilla
Gift received at 09-22-2012, 10:24 AM from Riczaj01
Message: downhere in Northern Mexico(aka San Antonio Texas), we tend to share this....not my personal favorite, but I'm definately in the minority.Trophy
Gift received at 01-30-2012, 01:48 PM from Dagan81
Message: Because you're the best God damn poster on this message board!  And, a true friend at that!9599
    Well I think we can all agree that Manu was a wasted signing. What ever Martz's intended use for him, it didn't work and I'd like to see anyone but him get a shot at the FB spot this year. One interesting FA out there who fits both as a FB and a power RB is Kuhn from the Packers. Might be worth a look once FA starts.
    I'm getting to that age where a lifetime warranty just doesn't mean as much to me anymore as an afternoon nap.



    Honey Badger Don't Care. Honey Badger Don't Give a Shit.


  • #20
    Senior Member Blue Horse-shoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    South suburbs
    Posts
    1,703
    Bear Bucks
    13,101
    Post Thanks / Like
    Items Old StyleBears C57Brian Piccolo6
    Quote Originally Posted by soulman View Post
    Well I think we can all agree that Manu was a wasted signing. What ever Martz's intended use for him, it didn't work and I'd like to see anyone but him get a shot at the FB spot this year. One interesting FA out there who fits both as a FB and a power RB is Kuhn from the Packers. Might be worth a look once FA starts.
    Kuhn would be good. Aside from Edgar Bennett I'm having a hard time thinking of many Packers who've become Bears.
    What should you call any : Fumble , Hold , Interception , Three and out , or Sack ?

    A " F.H.I.T.S " ? or a J'Marcus ?

  • Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •