The Gary Miller Award ( for media idiots )

For those who don't know u can look up former ESPN sportscaster/journalist Gary Miller ( and his antics ) on Wiki. Edited to the Jay Mariotti award it's more fitting.


Anyways ...... for stirring up the non-existent Johnny Knox trade rumor and even being enough of an ass to write an article about it; the 1st ever nomination goes to Brad Biggs. Way to go Biggsy. That was real nice of ya'.





( and keep up the bad work )

I am not willing to write this off as a bogus report just yet.

Remember the Olsen "I want to be traded" story a few years ago? It was denied all over the place. After he was traded, word came out that every word of that earlier story was true.

And for the record, he never said he WILL ask for a trade. Or that he DID!

Here is the exact wordage from the story

Quote:

---

If he can't displace Williams for the Sept. 11 opener against the Falcons, there's a better than fair chance he will push for a new home, according to a source.

---

See CHANCE

Speculation.

Not a sure thing.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The Benjamin

And for the record, he never said he WILL ask for a trade. Or that he DID!

Here is the exact wordage from the story

See CHANCE

Speculation.

Not a sure thing.

---

Funny how it's always " according to a source ".

( it was the voices inside my head your honor )

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Blue Horse-shoe

Funny how it's always " according to a source ".

( it was the voices inside my head your honor )

---

Of course it is. There is always an unnammed source. That is reporter code for inserting their own thoughts into a story.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The Benjamin

Of course it is. There is always an unnammed source. That is reporter code for inserting their own thoughts into a story.

---

Then they get called on it and it's : " I'm sticking by my story " ( what else are they gonna say ? ).
And : " I have to protect my source " ( of course ).
Same ol same ol.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Blue Horse-shoe

Then they get called on it and it's : " I'm sticking by my story " ( what else are they gonna say ? ).
And : " I have to protect my source " ( of course ).
Same ol same ol.

---

Sometimes it is true, sometimes it is not.

Bottom line, when someone asks to remain anonymous a good reporter keeps his word and will not reveal the source

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The Benjamin

And for the record, he never said he WILL ask for a trade. Or that he DID!

Here is the exact wordage from the story

See CHANCE

Speculation.

Not a sure thing.

---

Oh not you don't. You can't take that one word out of the phrase and use it to interpret what that phrase means. That's taking the meaning of the word "chance" out of context. Bad Benji, Benji Bad!

The phrase "better than a fair chance" is usually taken to mean things like; "quite likely", better than average", "odds are good", "more than even", "a liklihood", etc., etc., etc, ad nauseum. The phrase does not mean that it's pure speculation although that's what it must be in the author's mind, LOL.

This is what most of us would call "yellow journalism"; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellow_journalism

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The Benjamin

Of course it is. There is always an unnammed source. That is reporter code for inserting their own thoughts into a story.

---

Now that's a correct interpretation of it and just the opposite of what you've deabating with us. Schizoid symptoms kicking up today? :lol-032::lol-032::lol-032:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by soulman

Now that's a correct interpretation of it and just the opposite of what you've deabating with us. Schizoid symptoms kicking up today? :lol-032::lol-032::lol-032:

---

What the hell are you talking about?

I am just saying, you can not write off the thought, because that same thing was used a year ago when Martz was hired.

"Unnamed sources said Olsen wanted a trade"
Olsen says that is not true
Angelo says that is not true
fast forward a year
Angelo admits, yes he wanted to be traded a year ago

Just cause it is an unnamed source, does not mean that it is always just the reporters thoughts and opinions.

Just most of the time