-
Lovie's GLass is Always Half Full; Of What Though?
Lovie Smith: Bears can be better than last year
By SEAN JENSEN sjensen@suntimes.com August 18, 2011 11:58PM
Lovie Smith believes his Bears will silence their naysayers in 2011 because “our core is still in place.” | Nam Y. Huh~AP
Article Extras

View Gallery
Updated: August 19, 2011 11:56AM
BOURBONNAIS, Ill. — In a quiet moment during an otherwise hectic training camp at Olivet Nazarene University, Bears coach Lovie Smith takes a breath and readily admits to one of his most obvious characteristics. ‘‘Yeah,’’ Smith says, ‘‘my glass is always half full.’’
That perpetual optimism draws the wrath of outsiders of Halas Hall, yet endears him to the insiders of the Bears’ headquarters in Lake Forest. Players come and go, games are won and lost, but Smith remains the same man: His words measured, his actions determined.
A year ago, despite many preseason projections that his club would finish last in the NFC North, Smith challenged his coaches and players to focus only on the next game, then celebrated his third division title at season’s end.
Now, hardly anyone projects the Bears to defend their NFC North title since the rival Green Bay Packers defeated them and the Pittsburgh Steelers to win the Super Bowl. But with training camp winding to a close, Smith and his players aren’t challenging the New York Jets for most grandiose boasts, opting instead — as always — to quietly go about their business.
Smith, though, can’t mask his excitement about the 2011 Bears, from his confidence in his players to his coaches and general manager Jerry Angelo.
The locker room? The question is as innocuous as they come: What makes Smith hopeful about this year’s team? Smith gets animated, delineating his points. ‘‘I just think our core is still in place,’’ he excitedly says. ‘‘We’ve lost some good players who are playing for other teams. But our core is in place, and I think this team can be better than last [year].
‘‘There’s no reason to think it shouldn’t be. Reasons why?’’
On offense, Smith explains, the Bears are looking to get more production because the skill players are in their second season with offensive coordinator Mike Martz, and they’ve upgraded at receiver and running back.
‘‘Offensive line, I understand people want to wait and see on the offensive line,’’ Smith says. ‘‘That’s a fair statement to make right now. But we think this line will jell. We’ve added a first-round talent [Gabe Carimi] to the group, and Chris Spencer.’’
Unprompted, though, Smith mentions the loss of center Olin Kreutz, as well as tight end Greg Olsen. But he insists other leaders — and tight ends Kellen Davis and Matt Spaeth — will step up to fill the void. ‘‘So offensively,” Smith says, ‘‘that’s why I’m pumped up.
‘‘And defensively, we’re intact. Second year, again, with this group together. Our special teams, we feel we’ve upgraded. So to answer your question, yes, we feel we’re better.’’
There was outrage from players when the club didn’t re-sign Kreutz. But the players have since moved on, and they aren’t concerned there will be a leadership void.
‘‘We’re a veteran team,” linebacker Brian Urlacher says. ‘‘We know what’s expected of us and what needs to be done, and it starts with our head coach. ‘‘Lovie lets us be men. We practice hard, and guys do the right thing. The culture is set.’’
Smith says he cannot diminish Kreutz’s leadership, but he adds that his role hasn’t changed. ‘‘I’m the head football coach,’’ he says. ‘‘I set the tempo on everything. I realize that. But we also have a locker room full of veteran leaders.”
The coaches and GM? During his tenure, Smith hasn’t been shy about making changes to his coaching staff, noting his philosophy is the same now as ever.
‘‘To me, if he’s a bad coach or it just doesn’t work — he doesn’t fit your philosophy, he’s just not what you’re looking for — you make changes,’’ he says. ‘‘But the guys you have here and believe in, you let them coach. ‘‘This is a veteran staff. You go man to man, and you see why I’m so pumped up about the personnel.’’
There were some gut-check moments for the staff last season, when the team started 3-0, then lost three of the next four heading into the bye. But the Bears finished the season by winning seven of their final nine games. ‘‘We’ve been through some tough times,’’ Smith says. ‘‘But what you saw is guys back-to-back, working toward solutions.’’
That also applies to his relationship with Angelo. Smith insists there’s no friction between the two, posing a question as his answer. ‘‘Who has the longest tenure together, GM and head coach? Who is that?’’ Smith asks playfully.
Angelo hired Smith in January 2004, making this their eighth season together. ‘‘People say guys get along. But there’s a reason for that,’’ Smith says. ‘‘Jerry and I talk more than one time every day about things that are going on. There are no surprises.’’ Naturally, Smith says, the two don’t always agree on everything, raising an example of a married couple with a plethora of decisions that ultimately crop up.
‘‘But there’s a common ground,’’ Smith says. ‘‘And we’ve had no major differences in how we do things. ‘‘There are no issues. If there were, you could probably tell. You could see it when Jerry and I are around each other.’’
That’s because they have history, helping to turn around the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, with Angelo as the director of player personnel and Smith as the linebackers coach. They worked together in Tampa for five seasons. ‘‘It’s not like we came here and said, ‘Let’s see what this guy is about?’ ” Smith says. ‘‘Most of the time, perception and reality are two different things. The reality is, Jerry and I have a great working relationship. We have since Day 1, and it’s only grown.’’
To be fair, Smith doesn’t have a reference point, which he readily acknowledges. ‘‘This is the only GM I’ve ever been with, so I don’t know how other guys do it,’’ he says. ‘‘But I just know that our working relationship works. I see it working daily.’’
I'm getting to that age where a lifetime warranty just doesn't mean as much to me anymore as an afternoon nap.
Honey Badger Don't Care. Honey Badger Don't Give a Shit.
-
-
I really don't have any comment on this. I have every bit as much hope that Lovie is right as the next person but sometimes I wonder just what color the sky is in his "Mr. Rogers" world, LOL. He has far more faith in his offense than most of the sporting press and fans do.
I'm getting to that age where a lifetime warranty just doesn't mean as much to me anymore as an afternoon nap.
Honey Badger Don't Care. Honey Badger Don't Give a Shit.
-
and why not?..
We've added a key piece to the O-line in Carimi which was a whole lotta luck getting him late in the first like we did.
It's everyone's second year in the system so even if the line didn't improve one bit we're still looking at a QB who's making quicker decisions (there were plenty sacks last year where Cutler had more than enough time) and Recievers who know where to be and are getting there without overthinking it.
add to the fact we finally got some capable relief for forte and hard hitters in short yardage situations...
yeah... I'd say we're looking better, which would mean we can BE BETTER?... unless I"m missing something.
-

Originally Posted by
GrizzlyBear91
and why not?..
We've added a key piece to the O-line in Carimi which was a whole lotta luck getting him late in the first like we did.
It's everyone's second year in the system so even if the line didn't improve one bit we're still looking at a QB who's making quicker decisions (there were plenty sacks last year where Cutler had more than enough time) and Recievers who know where to be and are getting there without overthinking it.
add to the fact we finally got some capable relief for forte and hard hitters in short yardage situations...
yeah... I'd say we're looking better, which would mean we can BE BETTER?... unless I"m missing something.
Grizz my only real concerns are with that Oline and Martz's willingness to adapt his gameplans and playcalling to emphasize the running game, play action passing, and by allowing Cutler more options through rollouts and a moving pocket if (or when) it becomes obvious that the quality of the pass blocking still has a long way to go. I have less faith than Lovie that this line will gel anytime soon.
We both know that's were it all starts offensively and I believe the single addition of Carimi, while a start, still falls short of what was needed to assure some real improvement. Despite Lovie's profession of faith we wouldn't have made LT Jerome Bushrod our first Oline priority in FA if they has been convinced that Webb was ready to handle the job now and maybe not ever. Losing out on him and then the big swing and miss on Colon will hurt this offense and right now the Garza vs Spencer at OC thing isn't helping either.
We'll see how they do Monday against NY and maybe my thoughts will change but to me there is still a lot of work to be done before the season starts if this line is gonna provide the pass protection Cutler and this offense need. Do you really believe Martz will lead with a running game this year?
I'm getting to that age where a lifetime warranty just doesn't mean as much to me anymore as an afternoon nap.
Honey Badger Don't Care. Honey Badger Don't Give a Shit.
-
High Fives / Like - 1 BEAR DOWN!, 0 Dislikes
-
Well, I can kind of see Lovies' point.
First Defense: At safety, we have Harris returning. His veteran leadership stabilized the position last year, and Major Wright demonstrated solid tackling in limited appearance last year and so far this year. At Linebacker, we still have the 'Lach+Briggs combo, and Roach(?) as the 3rd. Not much change there. Corner, Tillman and Jennings are still here. While most wouldn't rave about Jennings it's unlikely that he will be worse than last year. D-Line.... if only 1/2 of the (projected) new players on the D-line step up, the Bears may well have one of the best D-lines in the NFL.
Looking at all of that, it's hard to say the Bears defense, barring illness,accident, or injury, won't be as good or better than last year. (I'm unable to find the words for my excitement... whoot whoot whooty whoot wootness....)
Offensively: At QB, the return of a healthy Cutler has left the Bears with the closest thing to a QB controversy being the Martz vs. Haine relationship. RB, Forte has had a well documented off season workout, and to all appearances, is ready for the season. Add in Barber, and the Bears look to have improved at this position. At WR, the Bears added Williams, who may or may not pan out, Knox came back with 15 pounds more muscle with no apparent loss of speed. Add in some FA &/ off season hires and the Bears don't look any worse than last year, with a lot of potential to be better. TE? Well, we have a bunch of bigger TEs this year. Could they be worse than last year? That leaves us with the 800lb. gorilla the O-line. Carimi is a big + for us, the rest of the O-Line is operating on a "I'll believe it when I see it" basis. It should be kept in mind that the O-line did play better late last season, and the pundits like to think that teams that play well (or just show significant improvement) late in the season, will break out (or at least play well/better) in the following season.
So, the offense looks to be improved in every area except the O-line. Which roughly breaks even with the potential to be better.
Last year the O-line looked FAR worse in preseason than in even the first few games. This is why I've been holding my judgement of the O-line until after the 3rd preseason game. We should have a much clearer idea of who on the O-line does or doesn't have a high LOFT (props to 4th) factor.
"Professional Armchair Quarterback" and other oxymora.....
-

Originally Posted by
soulman
Grizz my only real concerns are with that Oline and Martz's willingness to adapt his gameplans and playcalling to emphasize the running game, play action passing, and by allowing Cutler more options through rollouts and a moving pocket if (or when) it becomes obvious that the quality of the pass blocking still has a long way to go. I have less faith than Lovie that this line will gel anytime soon.
We both know that's were it all starts offensively and I believe the single addition of Carimi, while a start, still falls short of what was needed to assure some real improvement. Despite Lovie's profession of faith we wouldn't have made LT Jerome Bushrod our first Oline priority in FA if they has been convinced that Webb was ready to handle the job now and maybe not ever. Losing out on him and then the big swing and miss on Colon will hurt this offense and right now the Garza vs Spencer at OC thing isn't helping either.
We'll see how they do Monday against NY and maybe my thoughts will change but to me there is still a lot of work to be done before the season starts if this line is gonna provide the pass protection Cutler and this offense need. Do you really believe Martz will lead with a running game this year?

Since it is a preseason game I would blitz every single down vs the bears since the score would be meaningless in this game but taking out the starting qb would be worth it. Now if Lovie had a brain he would keep a lot of his key offensive starters out of this game to avoid injury.
-
High Fives / Like - 1 BEAR DOWN!, 0 Dislikes
-
Thank god we don't play the Packers or the Giants..oh sh--!
-

Originally Posted by
4th and 26
Since it is a preseason game I would blitz every single down vs the bears since the score would be meaningless in this game but taking out the starting qb would be worth it. Now if Lovie had a brain he would keep a lot of his key offensive starters out of this game to avoid injury.
They don't even need to blitz. The Giants have enough of a pass rush without it. I don't think we'll see all that much of Cutler or Forte but I'm betting the Oline plays into the 3rd quarter just like they did last week. Still a lot of guys to look at for FB/HB and WR in addition to giving both Hanie and Enderle some more work.
I'm getting to that age where a lifetime warranty just doesn't mean as much to me anymore as an afternoon nap.
Honey Badger Don't Care. Honey Badger Don't Give a Shit.