


Breakdown of Martz's play calling and my commentary in Red:
1st Drive (0-0)
Forte run, 1 yard gain
Inc pass
Inc pass
Punt
First drive, start run, 2 Inc passes...sucks, but balanced, and beginning of game
2nd Drive (0-0)
Forte 42 yard run
18 yard pass to Forte
Inc pass
9 yard pass to Bennett
10 yard pass to Clutts
Inc pass, Grounding
Inc pass, Defensive holding
Forte 4 yard run
Forte run, no gain
Inc pass
Forte -1 yard run
8 yard TD pass to Sanz
Next drive, First play...run again and a HUGE one. Then, nunch of pass plays, but if you notice...most of them WORKED. Had the two off-setting penalties, a bunch of runs that DIDNT work (no to little gain), and finally a TD pass to put us on the board.
3rd Drive (7-3)
Forte 8 yard run
Forte -1 yard run
Inc pass
Punt
Another Drive...another decent run to start off. Then a no gain run. This puts us at 3rd and 3. Couldve tried to run again for the first down, but seeing as how the runs seem to be hit or miss, opted for the pass...incomplete, punt. Cant really fault the play calling on this one.
4th Drive (7-10)
2 yard pass to Forte
Inc Pass
Inc Pass
Punt
Ok, first drive that was all pass. 2nd and 8, couldve gone run, but went pass...Inc. So, 3rd and 8, a pass play is the smarter call, hard to convert on a run, but ill leave this up for debate.
5th Drive (7-13)
Forte run, no gain
8 yard pass to Sanz
Inc pass
Punt
Another drive started by a Forte run...only this time nothing doing. Then...8 yard pass to Sanz, sets up 3rd and 2. Run is the more LIKELY option on 3rd and 2, so perhaps they went pass to counter that and catch em off guard. Yes, maybe they shouldve gone run, but it you remember...the runs have been hit or miss so far.
6th Drive (7-16)
Inc Pass
6 yard pass to Forte
15 yard pass to Forte
11 yard pass to Forte
Inc pass
12 yard QB scramble
Inc pass
17 yard pass to Forte
Inc Pass
----Time Running out in Half----
FG
This drive was slightly different because it was a 2 minute drill, and we were trying to advance down field to put points up before the half. And if you notice...most of the pass plays worked. Only real run play was QB scramble, gained 12 yards from it. Now...this adds to the "pass" stats, but in a 2 minute drill, most plays ARE passes. We ended up with a FG, so got something out of it.
7th Drive (10-16)
16 yard pass to Forte
30 yard pass to Knox
Inc pass
Inc pass
Inc pass
FG
2nd half now, and up to this drive, nothing really was "wrong" with Martz's play calling. remember our D got burned on that 79 yard pass...werent for that, we would actually be WINNING 10-9 by this point. 2 good passes here...then 3 incompletes. Ok, he shoulda tossed some runs into this drive, especially after the Knox first down. But, still ended up with a FG, got us within 3
8th Drive (13-16)
Bell rush for -1 yard
Cutler sacked and Fumbles
And this is where we start to fall apart. Start another drive, with a RUN (again), and then sack/fumble and NO TD to put them up by 10.
9th Drive (13-23)
10 yard pass to Forte
Inc pass
15 yard pass to Knox
Forte rush, no gain
Inc pass
Inc pass
Punt
Down by 10, 2 successful passes, 1 INC, and 1 rush to nowhere. Balanced for a drive, since the passes were working (even if they were dump offs). Rush gave us 2nd and 10. So now youre left with a choice....run AGAIN and hope to pick up some yards, or try a pass. They passed. INC. Now 3rd and 10...pretty much HAVE to pass again.
10th Drive (13-30)
Inc Pass
17 yard pass to Hester
21 yard pass to Forte
Inc pass
Inc pass
Sacked
Punt
Same story, different downs...only THIS time, we are down by THREE scores. Inc Pass, 2 successful passes, 2 more INCs, a sack, and punt. Yes, after the successful throws, we shouldve tossed in some runs.
11th Drive (13-30)
Sacked, -9 yards
1 yard pass to Forte
Inc pass
Punt
And now we OPEN with a loss of 9 yards. Down by 3 scores...2nd and 19. Pretty much pass is expected, run wont do much. 3rd and 18. Have to pass
12th Drive (13-30)
False start...on Omiyale. AGAIN. -5 yards
17 yard pass to Sanz
13 yard pass to Hurd
Another false start, Webb...-5 yards
Inc Pass
Sacked
Sacked
Downs
Another drive starting with negative yards, then 2 successful passes, 2 first downs...then negative yards again. Inc, 2 sacks...at this point...yeah, need to rush more, but time running out and 3 scores down, most teams pass to move down field. Sacks and penalties were KILLING our FP.
13th Drive (13-30)
Sacked, -7 yards
Inc pass
Inc pass
Punt
Final drive, 3rd in a row we start with negative yards. Have to pass...inc, inc, punt. Surprise, surprise.
============
Overall...should we have run more? Yes. But i think when you look at it...we were doing ok in the play calling department until that sack/fumble. We opened our drives with runs (predictable, but some worked), we had some success in the pass game...overall it wasnt that bad. But, panic mode set in, then the sack numbers increased, the false start penalties...we just killed ourselves. So yeah...between the plethora of sacks and false starts, i still blame the OL. Martz did seem to panic some late in the game...but who could blame him?
Bears' 52 pass plays, 11 handoffs doesn't cut it
Smith: 'We can't win football games with that kind of balance'
By Brad Biggs, Chicago Tribune reporter
10:21 p.m. CDT, September 19, 2011
Seven times in 91 seasons, the Bears offense has run the ball 12 times or fewer in a game.
Four of those have come during the career of Matt Forte that spans 50 games, most recently Sunday in a 30-13 loss at New Orleans when offensive coordinator Mike Martz called 52 pass plays (45 Jay Cutler passes, six sacks, one scramble) and 11 handoffs.
"Surprised?" Forte said Monday morning. "Yeah. Ten rushes is not really a whole lot. But when you get behind pretty quick in the second half, I think the mindset was to pass the ball and try to get big chunks of yardage back or get a quick score in the passing game."
Thing is, offensive coordinator Mike Martz went pass happy way before the score got lopsided. At the point the Bears allowed their first sack with 10 minutes, 2 seconds remaining in the third quarter, they trailed the Saints 16-13 and Martz had dialed up 29 pass plays and 10 runs.
Forte had a 42-yard gain on his second carry and had just eight more rushes the rest of the game in a one-sided effort that looked suspiciously like Martz's early-season work from 2010, when the Bears had 14 carries in one game and twice rushed only 16 times.
"I know the balance wasn't there," coach Lovie Smith said. "All I can say is we'll get it better. We can't win football games with that kind of balance."
Smith has seen it before. Three times in 2009 under former offensive coordinator Ron Turner, the Bears ran the ball 12 times or fewer. Turner was fired after the season by the coach who once talked about his team getting of the bus running.
Martz must have forgotten about the subtle roster moves made during the offseason to make the Bears more run-oriented. Tight end Greg Olsen was dumped to allow the offense to feature more effective blockers.
The game plan only aided the Saints' pass-rushing effort, allowing them to feast on Cutler, who couldn't slow them down with any hot reads behind a makeshift offensive line missing two starters after right tackle Gabe Carimi was lost to a right knee injury at halftime.
"Happens like that sometimes," Smith said. "We'll clean it up."
Ultimately, Smith is the man in charge and oversees all the decisions made. Play-calling didn't even out a year ago until after a meeting during the off week. In eight of the 11 regular-season games since, the Bears have had more rushes than passes.
"Yes, I have (spoken to Martz since the loss)," Smith said. "I'm not going to sit here and tell you the reason why, I'm just going to tell you we have to get the balance a lot better and we will. We didn't do that for a lot of different reasons."
Was one of them for fear they would not be able to have success running against the Saints?
"I'm going to tell you again, we didn't have the balance we needed," Smith replied. "I'm not going to give you anymore reasons why. We'll have it better this week. That's my answer."
Perhaps Martz will have some answers when he speaks Wednesday. Until then, you're left to wonder why the Bears would so clearly abandon Forte, who they regard to be maybe their best offensive player.
"If they know we're passing the ball just like (Sunday), they'll pin their ears back and bring everybody," Forte said. "It's hard to pick up everybody when they're blitzing like that. And when they do, you've got to hurt them in the passing game. We didn't get the ball off or when we threw it, it wasn't completed.
"You can't put blame on any one person or one position. It's a team effort. So everybody has got to be better at blitz protection and blitz pickup and notify who to get and how to get them and all that good stuff. You can't put all the blame on the offensive line."
You can start with the coordinator though.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports...,7820564.story
Arguing on the internet is like winning the special olympics, even if you win your still messed up.
Restore the roar!

Windy thanks for the thread and shorty you hit the nail on the head here. If I had gotten to the board yesterday I would have put up a post asking for Mike Martz head just I did with Terry Shea many moons ago. This really isn't meant to be an "I told you so" because most everyone would have and did agree with me when I said this before. Mike Martz is about the poorest choice for an OC we could ever have made.
Just like Terry Shea before him he's running an offense without the personnel to make it successful and it is not even anywhere close to Chicago Bears football. Why they hired the guy is beyond me with the singular exception of the fact that it seems no one else wanted the job and of course Martz was available because no on else wanted him. That debacle in Detroit should have nailed the lid shut on his career. The only positive I can find from this is that her didn't sign the extension he was offered and the Bears should count their lucky stars that he didn't. He needs to go and the Bears should look into hiring Jeremy Bates now that Seattle let him go as their OC. Bates was Cutler's guru here in Denver and I think he was the guy the Bears really wanted but being a former USC coach he went with Pete Carroll instead. The offense Martz is running will never be a consistent winner with this team and he's getting a very good QB killed with his arrogance and insistence on doing things his way.
You could see how pissed off Cutler was getting with the play calls he was being handed and with no chance of calling audibles he was screwed almost every time he stepped to the line and saw an unblocked blitzing LB coming from his left. How many time outs did he have to call to keep pointing that out. Even old stone faced Lovie was caught on camera with a very pissed off look (for him) on his face looking up at the booth where Martz was calling plays. The guy is not a genius. He's a bullheaded old fool and he needs to either change his ways or I would fire his ass this week and let Tice run the offense until a suitable OC can be found. This is two years in a row that we've had this problem with him and I think by now we all know that it's not gonna change.
Jimmors summary aside the reality comes from watching what was happening not just from counting up the number of runs versus passes. The only thing that's accurate is that we were very close at halftime but the handwriting was still on the wall. The Saints knew we were gonna pass and they were ready for it. This was a $500k loss because that's what it would have cost us to keep Olin Kruetz from handing Greg Williams Martz playbook. The Saints had a better idea of what Martz would do than our own offense did. The consistently bumped our smaller WRs off routes (no surprise there huh?) and blitz virtually every down and against this what did Mike Martz call? He consistently called pass plays which required 7 step drops and went with an empty backfield when anyone who was watching could see that they had an unblocked LB coming from the left side every time he did it. Was he watching a different game than we were?
When Kellen Davis completely blew his blocking assignment on the fumble where was his call out to Cutler to cover up because he was about to get nailed from his blindside? Nice lookin' out there Kellen. How long have you been playing this game? Some of you want to blame Webb but most of the time the rush from the left wasn't coming from his man! He was blocking his guy be there was no one assigned to the blitzer. No tight end most of the time and no RB left to pick up the blitz since the formation had everyone on the line of in the slot. That's a pretty good tip off that you're gonna flood the zone with receivers so all NO did was put a time clock on Cutler just like Buddy Ryan did in the 80's. Not once did I see them make an adjustment in the blocking scheme to compensate for it. Basically the line looked like the same Chinese Fire Drill that we saw during the first preseason game.
That line has a long way to go as far as reading and understanding pass blocking assignments so it makes no sense at all to subject than and Cutler to plays that constantly test them to the point of failure. Mike Martz in an arrogant fool and no matter what has been said to him by Lovie or Tice when in doubt he will always go to the pass. You can't tell me that he didn't see what NO was doing to counter him and yet he did nothing to adjust or even attempt to back them off. After a while the whole offense looked confused and even what has been working wasn't anymore. You can't give any team the kind of TOP advantage we gave NO and expect to win. Actually with the exception of Wrigh'ts fuck up on that long pass to Henderson they played fairly well but it's pretty obvious that we missed Chris Harris. Wright seems lost without him playing next to him and even his tackling was tenative.
I'll just finish this by saying that Sundays game was a great statement as to why Chris Harris should be offered an extension and why Matt Forte is worth a whole lot more to the Bears offense than they're probably giving him credit for. What did he have, about 60% of the total offensive output? The only time we moved the ball successfully is when he had it in his hands.
I'm getting to that age where a lifetime warranty just doesn't mean as much to me anymore as an afternoon nap.
Honey Badger Don't Care. Honey Badger Don't Give a Shit.

I'm not ready to label Webb a bust yet, and he's still better than OMG who can't even pass block as a RT, but there's no question that JA's failure to sign a more epxerienced LT was a major league fvck up and once again we pay the price because Martz refuses to allow for this. The same can be said for allowing Martz to talk him into Roy Williams instead of going after a more dependable WR like Malcom Floyd.
We lost out in FA at those two spots because JA decided to go cheap and that's exactly what we're stuck with. Second choices. If he wanted Bushrod he needed to make an offer than the Saints could not afford to match and still keep their two allstar OG's, who by the way did an awfully good job of keeping Brees clear of any inside rush so that he had plenty of room to throw. We all know by now that he didn't and than on top of that Tice plays the LT we drafted at RT so now we have two first round LT picks who aren't playing LT and a 7th round project who is.
Where this frugality came from all of a sudden I don't know but when you're team fell just short of making, and very possibly winning, the Super Bowl and what you need to do to take the next step forward is as obvious as this was to have failed at it is pathetic personnel management in my book. If you're gonna hire Mike Martz as on OC you either need to allow a change in your offensive philosophy and get him all of the tools he needs or fire the guy and get someone who can build a top 10 offense with the talent available. JA did neither so in that regard yes, I do find fault with this.
The season if far from over but it's pretty plain to me that we need some serious help on that Oline. Having to once again play OMG is bad enough but also having Webb learning to play LT on the job makes us really weak at OT. I can't wait to see how they propose to handle Matthews this week. If they don't get the run blocking needed to move the ball that way we don't stand a chance. If this Oline couldn't handle the Saints blitzes the Packers are gonna drive them crazy. This is where Cutler needs to go to Martz and tell him that he wants input into the game plan and some audibles to call at the line when needed.
I'm getting to that age where a lifetime warranty just doesn't mean as much to me anymore as an afternoon nap.
Honey Badger Don't Care. Honey Badger Don't Give a Shit.


Something I thought about while listening to everyone talk about this is that Forte was the leading reciever. Then it hit me; Philly, when they had Westbrook, did the same thing. They used the these little rb routes as run plays. Then you think about the lack of an OL and there inability to get a push or open wholes and; if these passes to Forte were intended to be that as McNabb to Westbrook as running plays, then they start to make since. The rest of the inbalance comes from being 2+ scores behind as the game wore on.
Maybe I missed something, but when Cutler was blindsided and fumbled (which really cost us the game), why in the ************** ********* was Davis the TE and not Spaeth? Isn't Spaeth supposed to be our "6th offensive lineman"? **** like that makes trading Olsen away look even worse.
We just need to be thankful that this happened in week 2. And after the Lovie press conference I think that changes will be made.
Last year it took till week 7 to make these changes and get to winning games.
This loss might be the best thing that has happened to the Bears.
XaosGorilla say BEAR DOWN!