-
Just here reading...
...and, nobody has anything positive to say...?!? I sure do miss DB54's lobotomy-like points of view...!!!
Anywho, I am still waiting until after game (4) to make my comments. It is NOT easy, but, I am giving the Bears the benefit of the doubt...!!! At ease...
3nagurski
"...Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit sniffing glue...."
-
-
Patrick Mannelly remains a rock.
Winston Churchill:
"Since light travels faster than sound, some people appear bright until you hear them speak."
"If you're not a liberal at twenty you have no heart, if you're not a conservative at forty you have no brain."
-
High Fives / Like - 4 BEAR DOWN!, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by
BearStuff 
Patrick Mannelly remains a rock.
I will sleep so much better this evening...thank you...!!!
3nagurski
"...Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit sniffing glue...."
-
High Fives / Like - 1 BEAR DOWN!, 0 Dislikes
-
D looked solid through most the game. Outside the opening drive, and once worn out, started giving up more points again. DB's are not good(we all knew that), LB's are very good(we all knew that), DL suprisingly doens't look good(think the board was split on how they would do).
ST's seems fine; Podesh isn't anything special, he's averaging about 7 more yards then that dead legged kicker we had last year. Gould is solid, coverage/returns are bad.
OL is atroshous, if you are wondering why they looked so good in pass protection, it's because GB wasn't worried about rushing him. It was stop Forte and cover. Cutler, now so gunshy, even when he has time doesnt' set his feet. And he still doens't trust a WR on this team and b/c of that holds the ball to long.
-
Originally Posted by
Riczaj01 D looked solid through most the game. Outside the opening drive, and once worn out, started giving up more points again. DB's are not good(we all knew that), LB's are very good(we all knew that), DL suprisingly doens't look good(think the board was split on how they would do).
ST's seems fine; Podesh isn't anything special, he's averaging about 7 more yards then that dead legged kicker we had last year. Gould is solid, coverage/returns are bad.
OL is atroshous, if you are wondering why they looked so good in pass protection, it's because GB wasn't worried about rushing him. It was stop Forte and cover. Cutler, now so gunshy, even when he has time doesnt' set his feet. And he still doens't trust a WR on this team and b/c of that holds the ball to long.
Ever really wonder what it's like to BE Jay Cutler ? In high school he probably looked forward to Friday nights. In college he looked forward to Saturday afternoons. In the pro's ( at first ) he probably looked forward to Sunday afternoons; think he does now ? Would you ?
What should you call any : Fumble , Hold , Interception , Three and out , or Sack ?
A " F.H.I.T.S " ? or a J'Marcus ?
-
I think he is getting the Rex/KO treatment. Both had no confidence in the OL/WR; how long ago was that? That is how long this has been an issue; but instead of seeing it for what it was, we lambasted the qb's. Neither are elite, but both were good enough if the OL and WR's were there to help them out. Only difference is we cannot say he sucked and cannot be good b/c he has shown he can be on another team before he came here.
-
High Fives / Like - 1 BEAR DOWN!, 0 Dislikes
-
The bar I was at they were raffling off jerseys. A Cutler one came up mid third early 4th some dumbass fan screamed to burn it.
Might have been a packer fan though
-
Originally Posted by
The Benjamin The bar I was at they were raffling off jerseys. A Cutler one came up mid third early 4th some dumbass fan screamed to burn it.
Might have been a packer fan though
Lemme guess . Right after, he was looking around the room with his best " ain't I cool " smile on his face .
What should you call any : Fumble , Hold , Interception , Three and out , or Sack ?
A " F.H.I.T.S " ? or a J'Marcus ?
-
Originally Posted by
Riczaj01 I think he is getting the Rex/KO treatment. Both had no confidence in the OL/WR; how long ago was that? That is how long this has been an issue; but instead of seeing it for what it was, we lambasted the qb's. Neither are elite, but both were good enough if the OL and WR's were there to help them out. Only difference is we cannot say he sucked and cannot be good b/c he has shown he can be on another team before he came here.
Funny stat of the day:
Grossman: 68/114 846 Yds 5 Tds 3 INTs 8 sacks 2 Fumbles
Kyle Orton: 63/110 672 Yds 5 Tds 3 INTs 8 sacks 2 Fumbles
Jay Cutler: 62/114 858 Yds 5Tds 3 INTs 14 sacks 3 Fumbles.
all 3 have pretty much identical numbers through 3 games. Crazy.
-
High Fives / Like - 3 BEAR DOWN!, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by
Jimmors Funny stat of the day:
Grossman: 68/114 846 Yds 5 Tds 3 INTs 8 sacks 2 Fumbles
Kyle Orton: 63/110 672 Yds 5 Tds 3 INTs 8 sacks 2 Fumbles
Jay Cutler: 62/114 858 Yds 5Tds 3 INTs 14 sacks 3 Fumbles.
all 3 have pretty much identical numbers through 3 games. Crazy.
Well, except for 175% of the sacks.
Winston Churchill:
"Since light travels faster than sound, some people appear bright until you hear them speak."
"If you're not a liberal at twenty you have no heart, if you're not a conservative at forty you have no brain."
BearStuff say BEAR DOWN!
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote