Facebook Twitter

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 20 of 20

Thread: Bucky Brooks Says. . .

  1. 03-14-2012, 11:12 AM #11
    Zelezo Vlk
    Zelezo Vlk is online now
    Member Zelezo Vlk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    557
    Bear Bucks
    13,037
    Post Thanks / Like
    I don't know. I'm not a huge believer in Detroit's passing game after Megatron. The Pack is just more of a spread the wealth system like the Saints. The problem with both of those teams is that neither have a good/great running game. The Lions were competent with Jahvid Best, but that guy gets concussions like it's nothing. We have no idea how their recently drafted rookie (Leshure) will do in the big league. The Pack's running game is pretty laughable, and that works for them. Honestly, I would say that the Vikings might be just below us in the "Most Complete Offense" category.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  • 03-14-2012, 11:21 AM #12
    short faced bear
    short faced bear is offline
    Senior Member short faced bear's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    9,356
    Bear Bucks
    45,320
    Post Thanks / Like
    Items DaBearz MascotTrophy4699Dick Butkus Gift received at 02-04-2012, 11:13 PM from Dagan81 Message: I bestow upon you the gift of the world's greatest linebacker!
    Dear "Bucky Brooks":

    No...just no.

    That is all
    Arguing on the internet is like winning the special olympics, even if you win your still messed up.

     Restore the roar!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  • 03-14-2012, 11:29 AM #13
    Rogelio
    Rogelio is offline
    Member Rogelio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    323
    Bear Bucks
    8,284
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Zelezo Vlk View Post
    Honestly, I would say that the Vikings might be just below us in the "Most Complete Offense" category.
    Not with Ponder at quarterback.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  • 03-14-2012, 01:48 PM #14
    Zelezo Vlk
    Zelezo Vlk is online now
    Member Zelezo Vlk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    557
    Bear Bucks
    13,037
    Post Thanks / Like
    He's had good games, he's had bad games. When he plays well, he looks pretty good. Heck, he almost beat the Pack early on, in his first game as a starter.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  • 03-14-2012, 01:50 PM #15
    Bear Goggles
    Bear Goggles is offline
    Drink until the season is pretty!
    Bear Goggles's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Drinking
    Posts
    135,237
    Bear Bucks
    11,344
    Trophies
    Post Thanks / Like
    Items Dick Butkus Gift received at 02-02-2012, 02:55 PM from Dagan81 Message: Thanks for the keg! I think I have your AIM screen name on my buddy list. Is it ChiBearsFan?Bears Head LogoDaBears MascotDollar Gift received at 10-21-2011, 01:29 PM from BigClaws Message: Show me your tits.Keg
    Touch your nose.


    Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhh, I never said Bucky Brooks says.






    I resisted this joke as long as I could
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  • 03-14-2012, 02:21 PM #16
    little bear
    little bear is offline
    Senior Member little bear's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    9,995
    Bear Bucks
    28,307
    Trophies
    Post Thanks / Like
    Items 546Bears Head LogoBears CTequilla Gift received at 10-20-2011, 07:40 AM from Henry Burris
    Let's not get too over-excited. The NFCN is one of the toughest divisions in the NFL and there are still many holes to fill. In fact, we don't know anything yet.

    I mean I'm not gonna book my flight to New Orleans before season starts. :P

    Take a deep breath and chill, my friends.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  • 03-14-2012, 02:42 PM #17
    soulman
    soulman is offline
    Mello Jello soulman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    PEYTON'S PLACE
    Posts
    23,002
    Bear Bucks
    40,812
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    1
    Items Captain Morgan Gift received at 11-07-2012, 07:28 AM from GermansbombedPH Message: Better than that soap water guniessTequilla Gift received at 09-22-2012, 10:24 AM from Riczaj01 Message: downhere in Northern Mexico(aka San Antonio Texas), we tend to share this....not my personal favorite, but I'm definately in the minority.Trophy Gift received at 01-30-2012, 01:48 PM from Dagan81 Message: Because you're the best God damn poster on this message board! And, a true friend at that!9599
    Buck Brooks? Who in the hell is Bucky Brooks and who made him the NFL.com ultimate judge of talent. Must be a slow day for him and he got assigned to write something good about the Bears for a change. We go from the 3rd best offense in the NFC to the 1st just on the strength of signing one bad boy WR? Overhyped as usual.
    I'm getting to that age where a lifetime warranty just doesn't mean as much to me anymore as an afternoon nap.



    Honey Badger Don't Care. Honey Badger Don't Give a Shit.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  • 03-14-2012, 05:22 PM #18
    Blue Horse-shoe
    Blue Horse-shoe is offline
    Senior Member Blue Horse-shoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    South suburbs
    Posts
    1,703
    Bear Bucks
    13,101
    Post Thanks / Like
    Items Old StyleBears C57Brian Piccolo6
    Quote Originally Posted by bearsinhouston View Post
    It is a rare combination to have a top QB, top RB and a true #1 WR, but I think in order to make the most of the RB, WR and QB, you need to protect them, and I'm still not convinced that we can do that effectively and consistently. Also, only having one top WR is going to be an issue. Bennett is very good and I expect he will get bigger numbers also, but I think we need better protection and another legit WR threat before I think we can say we are better than GB.

    Although, I do think we have the potential. I think Rogers is better than Cutler (although he gets better protection), we have a better RB and now probably a better WR, but in total, Rogers has many more viable targets to cover and so is probably still more dangerous and harder to defend against.
    If Greg Olsen was still here what would you guys say ? Well that ship has sailed but drafting 6'06 Fleener , a GO clone .. the 3rd fastest player on Stanford .. Luck's favorite receiver, a guy who works the middle of the field very well .... legit red zone threat to go along with Marshall. Hmmm. Sounds enticing to me and they could still get a Nate Potter in a later round to help provide depth at LT. Most won't agree but I think it's worth a serious look.
    What should you call any : Fumble , Hold , Interception , Three and out , or Sack ?

    A " F.H.I.T.S " ? or a J'Marcus ?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  • High Fives / Like - 1 BEAR DOWN!, 0 Dislikes
    BEAR DOWN! little bear say BEAR DOWN!
  • 03-14-2012, 05:26 PM #19
    Chi66
    Chi66 is offline
    Member Chi66's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Northern Michigan
    Posts
    456
    Bear Bucks
    9,134
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Blue Horse-shoe View Post
    If Greg Olsen was still here what would you guys say ? Well that ship has sailed but drafting 6'06 Fleener , a GO clone .. the 3rd fastest player on Stanford .. Luck's favorite receiver, a guy who works the middle of the field very well .... legit red zone threat to go along with Marshall. Hmmm. Sounds enticing to me and they could still get a Nate Potter in a later round to help provide depth at LT. Most won't agree but I think it's worth a serious look.
    I heard comparisons of Greg Olsen to Coby Fleener. Fleener looks very interesting, depending how free agency plays out I would be interested in him in the second round, but not earlier. He would create instant mismatches in the receiving game, still has to work on blocking but he's a pretty polished receiving TE.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  • 03-14-2012, 05:50 PM #20
    Jimmors
    Jimmors is offline
    The Rhymenoceros Jimmors's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Sin City
    Posts
    25,095
    Bear Bucks
    66,039
    Post Thanks / Like
    Still need to fix the OL, still need a receiving TE, still need help in the WR dept, still need to get Forte's contract done.

    So no...not the best yet...but we could very well get there in the next year or two.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
    • Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
    « WR/KR Eric Weems signs with Bears | Bears Re-Sign Kellen Davis »

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •  

    Forum Rules