Thread: Bucky Brooks Says. . .

Yeah, I wouldn't go that far. Considering we finally have one receiver who would crack Green Bay's top 3, I don't think we can say that yet. We also don't currently have a TE and need to do work on the line.

I second that Nerrad. Is Eddie Royal still up for grabs? Andd how much money is left?

It is a rare combination to have a top QB, top RB and a true #1 WR, but I think in order to make the most of the RB, WR and QB, you need to protect them, and I'm still not convinced that we can do that effectively and consistently. Also, only having one top WR is going to be an issue. Bennett is very good and I expect he will get bigger numbers also, but I think we need better protection and another legit WR threat before I think we can say we are better than GB.

Although, I do think we have the potential. I think Rogers is better than Cutler (although he gets better protection), we have a better RB and now probably a better WR, but in total, Rogers has many more viable targets to cover and so is probably still more dangerous and harder to defend against.

We could at least be in the convo w/a another move or two to shore up wr/ol and a solid draft. But you look at the weapons in Det and GB and we aren't there yet.

Originally Posted by Riczaj01

We could at least be in the convo w/a another move or two to shore up wr/ol and a solid draft. But you look at the weapons in Det and GB and we aren't there yet.

oh, absolutely. I think we can take the lead in terms of capability if we fill those holes. Especially if we could either get or develop someone like a Mario Williams, because then Rogers just got worse.