Facebook Twitter

Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: NFL Rules Committee Focuses on the IR's...................

  1. #1
    Mello Jello soulman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    PEYTON'S PLACE
    Posts
    22,851
    Bear Bucks
    39,756
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    1
    Items Captain Morgan
Gift received at 11-07-2012, 07:28 AM from GermansbombedPH
Message: Better than that soap water guniessTequilla
Gift received at 09-22-2012, 10:24 AM from Riczaj01
Message: downhere in Northern Mexico(aka San Antonio Texas), we tend to share this....not my personal favorite, but I'm definately in the minority.Trophy
Gift received at 01-30-2012, 01:48 PM from Dagan81
Message: Because you're the best God damn poster on this message board!  And, a true friend at that!9599

    NFL Rules Committee Focuses on the IR's...................

    Rules changes focus of meetings

    By BARRY WILNER, AP Pro Football Writer 4 hours, 36 minutes ago

    PALM BEACH, Fla. (AP)—Instant replay and injured reserve—the NFL’s IRs— will be main topics as the owners consider several rules changes at their spring meetings this week.

    The Buffalo Bills have proposed having the booth official make all decisions on replay reviews instead of referees. Under another suggestion, the booth official also would be allowed to review all turnovers just as he now does for all scoring plays.

    “This is a proposal that will definitely, I think, generate discussion, but I think it was directed at trying to speed it up,” said Rich McKay, president of the Atlanta Falcons and chairman of the competition committee.

    NFL commissioner Roger Goodell
    (AP Photo)

    “The thing about our system is we developed our system based on our experience the last time. That’s how we developed the idea that the referee would be the decision maker because we felt like he had the best ability to one, talk to the on-field official and two, have complete command of the rules and the application of them.”

    Last year, the committee recommended having the booth official review all scoring plays and now it is proposing expanding his duties to all turnovers. That should help coaches in deciding when to use their challenges.

    “We took scoring plays from the coaches and put it upstairs as an automatic review for him to confirm,” McKay said of the replay official. “If he felt it needed to be reviewed by the referee, then he stopped the game. We would use that same procedure for turnovers: fumbles, interceptions and the like.”

    A change to the injured reserve requirements for a designated player would be the first alteration in rules for that list since 1993. Until 1990, IR players had to sit out six games, and until `93 that became four games. Then the league clamped down on teams that “hid” prospects they might lose if released by placing them on IR even if their injuries were minor— or nonexistent.

    “I’m going to call it an injured reserve exception for major injury to a designated player,” McKay said.

    “Traditionally, in our system, injured reserve players have been out for the year. In this case, if that player was on the roster all the way through the first regular-season weekend, then you could put that player on injured reserve, designate that player for return and the player could begin to practice six weeks after he has gone on that list. And play in games eight weeks after he has gone on that list. “

    Another proposal will allow each team to designate one player per week who can go on the inactive list because of a concussion and be replaced on the roster.

    The NFL rarely tinkered with overtime until two years ago, when the Saints won the NFC title by winning the coin toss to start the extra period, marching downfield and kicking a field goal.

    Beginning in the 2010 season, that scenario required the team that lost the toss to get a possession, but only in the playoffs. That rule change has had no impact thus far, but the Steelers want it as part of the regular season, too. The league’s coaches subcommittee and the players’ union support the change.

    “What the coaches’ feeling was … strategically they like to prepare the same way in the regular season that they do in the postseason,” McKay said, “and they really don’t want to have different rules and have to change their approach to overtime.”

    NFL owners also will consider moving the trading deadline from after the sixth week of the schedule to after the eighth week. McKay said the hope is to generate more deals.

    “The trade deadline has traditionally been a little disappointing,” he said. “There is a lot of talk about it but then not very many transactions because of the nature of our sport being such a team sport. But our thought is that there could potentially be more trades now because of the salary cap and adjustment to it, and this was a way to give people a little more leeway.”

    Also proposed is allowing teams to have 90 players on the offseason and training camp rosters before the first cut, but counting unsigned draft choices. In the past, those unsigned players were not part of the 80-man rosters.

    McKay said the final cutdown to 53 could be moved up one day to Friday, Aug. 31 because the opening game will be played on a Wednesday night this year.

    Follow Yahoo! Sports' NFL coverage on Twitter.
    Last edited by soulman; 03-25-2012 at 04:30 PM.
    I'm getting to that age where a lifetime warranty just doesn't mean as much to me anymore as an afternoon nap.



    Honey Badger Don't Care. Honey Badger Don't Give a Shit.


  • #2
    Senior Member lklrlolnlilklsox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    6,070
    Bear Bucks
    30,351
    Trophies
    Post Thanks / Like
    Man, got me all excited that they were finally revamping their archaic injured reserve rules. I still hold out hope that the league will modify PUP rules to allow players who participated in camp and beyond to be added. It's not like it has stopped team from using the "red shirt" anyway, so why not make it easier to reward those rookies who needed more time to earn a spot to do so? Not to mention there should be a four-game IR in place for all players.

  • BEAR DOWN! short faced bear, BearStuff say BEAR DOWN!
  • #3
    Mello Jello soulman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    PEYTON'S PLACE
    Posts
    22,851
    Bear Bucks
    39,756
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    1
    Items Captain Morgan
Gift received at 11-07-2012, 07:28 AM from GermansbombedPH
Message: Better than that soap water guniessTequilla
Gift received at 09-22-2012, 10:24 AM from Riczaj01
Message: downhere in Northern Mexico(aka San Antonio Texas), we tend to share this....not my personal favorite, but I'm definately in the minority.Trophy
Gift received at 01-30-2012, 01:48 PM from Dagan81
Message: Because you're the best God damn poster on this message board!  And, a true friend at that!9599
    Some interesting proposals are on the this years docket.

    It looks like one will eliminate at least some of the coaches challenges if the decision to review plays other than just scoring plays is given over to the booth official rather than the on field referee. Since there's usually indecision on the part of coaches as to whether or not to take the risk of losing a timeout over an unsuccessful challenge this should eliminate some of the delay caused by that and speed up the game. But it does further reduce the referees on field authority.

    I like the idea for the proposed change in the IR rules. This way a player who was placed on IR needn't be lost for the entire season or have to be brought back through waivers in order to play. MLB had 15 day and 45 day disabled lists and something more similar to this where a player can recover, rehab and still rejoin his team makes sense. This may keep teams closer to full strength and more competitive if a starter is injured early and can still return in time for crucial late season games and/or the playoffs.

    A decision to include the current rules governing overtime in the playoffs to the regular season makes sense to me. It's a good rule and there's no reason why it shouldn't be made part of regular season rules for the sake of continuity if nothing else. I would still prefer something similar to college rules where each team trades possession from the 20 or 30 yardline until one out scores the other in it's possession. Do you kick that FG on 4th down and depend on your defense to stop the other guy or do you go for the kill shot?

    I don't think moving a the trading deadline will make much difference at all and the proposal about roster size seems to be to be six of one half dozen of another. It's not really much of a change.
    I'm getting to that age where a lifetime warranty just doesn't mean as much to me anymore as an afternoon nap.



    Honey Badger Don't Care. Honey Badger Don't Give a Shit.


  • #4
    Mello Jello soulman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    PEYTON'S PLACE
    Posts
    22,851
    Bear Bucks
    39,756
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    1
    Items Captain Morgan
Gift received at 11-07-2012, 07:28 AM from GermansbombedPH
Message: Better than that soap water guniessTequilla
Gift received at 09-22-2012, 10:24 AM from Riczaj01
Message: downhere in Northern Mexico(aka San Antonio Texas), we tend to share this....not my personal favorite, but I'm definately in the minority.Trophy
Gift received at 01-30-2012, 01:48 PM from Dagan81
Message: Because you're the best God damn poster on this message board!  And, a true friend at that!9599
    Quote Originally Posted by lklrlolnlilklsox View Post
    Man, got me all excited that they were finally revamping their archaic injured reserve rules. I still hold out hope that the league will modify PUP rules to allow players who participated in camp and beyond to be added. It's not like it has stopped team from using the "red shirt" anyway, so why not make it easier to reward those rookies who needed more time to earn a spot to do so? Not to mention there should be a four-game IR in place for all players.
    Yeah, about time something is done about that. Like I said MLB, the NHL and NBA all have limited term disabled lists so it's time for the NFL to get on board too. Losing a guy in week one or two and having to reserve a roster spot for him in order for him to return instead of placing him on temporary IR and allowing the team to fill the roster spot is archaic.

    I think almost invariably that spot will be filled by a rookie or second year guy from the PS who then gets a better chance of showing what he can do during the regular season and maybe earns a promotion because of it. If I'm not mistaken we held a spot open for Carimi last year in the event he could return in Nov. or Dec. before finally placing him on IR and ending his season. It would have been nice to have a PS guy like Horn active and challenging OMG for that OT backup spot. At least by now we have a better idea of his ability to play at an NFL level and whether or not he could challenge for a roster spot. The same with Ricky Henry.
    I'm getting to that age where a lifetime warranty just doesn't mean as much to me anymore as an afternoon nap.



    Honey Badger Don't Care. Honey Badger Don't Give a Shit.


  • Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •