-
More Players in the Mold of Briggs and Urlacher Needed...............
Players in mold of Urlacher and Briggs needed
Emery should know how to find them as he was a Bears scout when Pro Bowl linebackers were picked
Brian Urlacher and Lance Briggs celebrate at the end of the first half against the Eagles. (Nuccio DiNuzzo / Tribune Photo / April 21, 2012)
|
Dan Pompei On the NFL 4:03 p.m. CDT, April 21, 2012
What the Bears really could use in this draft is another Brian Urlacher and another Lance Briggs.
That's all.
What is another Urlacher?
It is not necessarily a middle linebacker.
But it is a young player who leads by action that the Bears can build their defense around for the next decade. It is a player who will go to multiple Pro Bowls and make teammates better.
What is another Briggs?
It is not necessarily an outside linebacker.
But it is a young defender who can be a big piece of the team's foundation, who is consistent from game to game and year to year and who almost always answers the bell. It is a playmaker who will be recognized as one of the best. It is an athlete who can transcend future scheme changes.
When the great Bears defense of the 1980s started to crumble, then-vice president Bill Tobin had the right idea.
In the 1989 and '90 drafts, he used five picks in the first or second rounds on cornerback Donnell Woolford, defensive end Trace Armstrong, linebacker John Roper, safety Mark Carrier and defensive tackle Fred Washington. (RIP Freddy Washington
)
Woolford, Armstrong and Carrier all became building blocks for the Bears, though none of them lasted in Chicago as long as Urlacher and Briggs have.
Urlacher is entering his 13th year as a Bear. He has played for three general managers, two head coaches, five defensive coordinators and five linebacker coaches. The Bears have paid him around $70 million for his services — and he has been worth every cent. (Jenny likes this and knows she won't have to pose for Playboy again)
Briggs will begin his 10th season in Chicago with 1,286 career tackles. In the time he has been the Bears' outside linebacker, a dozen players have made starts at quarterback.
So how do the Bears go about finding players like these two? (Well firing Angelo and hiring the guy who scouted those two for the Bears was a really, really, really good start)
Certainly, it isn't easy. New general manager Phil Emery might have an idea though. He was on the Bears scouting staff in 2000 when Urlacher was drafted and in 2003 when Briggs was picked.
What Emery can be sure of is he will need a little luck, as the Bears had with Urlacher.
Though the late Mark Hatley was running the draft then, Emery said former scout John Paul Young should be given most of the credit for Urlacher.
Urlacher was a safety, or rover, at New Mexico. The Bears picked him to play strong-side linebacker, and he was a bust there.
"We asked him to line up as an outside linebacker over the tight end," Emery recalled. "We felt all that length would make him an ideal outside linebacker. He was anointed as the starter from day one, and he struggled. It wasn't natural for him. He lost the starting job.
"Then the middle linebacker (Barry Minter) got hurt. We needed someone who could run. Well, Brian, could run. They put him in the middle, and he started making plays immediately. The rest is history."
The Bears had a little luck with Briggs too. GM Jerry Angelo drafted him for then-coordinator Greg Blache's defense, but it turned out he was perfect for Smith's Cover-2 scheme. (How does that old addage about a blind squirrel and an acorn go again?) 
The Bears wanted a linebacker that year, so Angelo assigned a committee of scouts, including Emery, to study a small group that included Nick Barnett, Victor Hobson and Briggs.
The committee wanted Briggs all along, even though some of the others were selected ahead of him. (Once again Phil's gentle insistence pays off)
Who could be another Urlacher or Briggs for the Bears?
It would not be a stretch to envision Boston College linebacker Luke Kuechly joining the sterling tradition of Bears linebackers that encompasses Bulldog Turner, George Connor, Bill George, Dick Butkus, Mike Singletary, Urlacher and Briggs. Kuechly is the highest rated linebacker in the draft and would fit in perfectly with Smith's scheme.
But perhaps big Dont'a Hightower from Alabama one day could take the baton from Urlacher. Maybe Zach Brown could bring us back to the days of Otis Wilson or Doug Buffone. (Another good fit)
If the Bears draft Illinois defensive end Whitney Mercilus, he will follow the path Butkus took from Champaign to Chicago. (70% chance he's our guy)
There are other pass rushers to consider too, like Melvin Ingram, Courtney Upshaw, Nick Perry and Andre Branch. And tackles too, like Jerel Worthy, Kendall Reyes and Devon Still. (Round two or three we should nab him)
Obviously, Emery will be looking for unusual speed and size like Urlacher has. He will be looking for rare instinct like Briggs has.
And he will be looking for the toughness, passion, competitiveness and selflessness he once saw and still sees in both players.
Ultimately, he will be looking for faces he can envision carved in bronze.
That's all.
dpompei@tribune.com
I'm getting to that age where a lifetime warranty just doesn't mean as much to me anymore as an afternoon nap.
Honey Badger Don't Care. Honey Badger Don't Give a Shit.
-
-
I know we can use help to add some depth on offense but there are just so many good defensive players in the first three rounds that are a great fit or us that it's hard not to want three of these guys 1,2,3.
I'm getting to that age where a lifetime warranty just doesn't mean as much to me anymore as an afternoon nap.
Honey Badger Don't Care. Honey Badger Don't Give a Shit.
-
We need impact players been saying this since the SUPERBOWL year. After that loss ja dumb ass thought we were good to go trading out of quality picks and just adding depth, st talent but no impact players for the future. Not to mention ignoring the offense that whole time. And that's why he is unemployed. I'm hoping emery has a different outlook for the team
-
How about a draft "in the mold" of 1983. Ironic when you look at the selections we made in 1983 how similar it is to our needs today.
The Greatest form of revenge is MASSIVE success.
-
High Fives / Like - 1 BEAR DOWN!, 0 Dislikes
-

Originally Posted by
motownbear
We need impact players been saying this since the SUPERBOWL year. After that loss ja dumb ass thought we were good to go trading out of quality picks and just adding depth, st talent but no impact players for the future. Not to mention ignoring the offense that whole time. And that's why he is unemployed. I'm hoping emery has a different outlook for the team
Well at least Emery went out and prioritized the offense before the draft. When you get right down to it they caliber of top offensive picks isn't all that great. With the exception of WR the other skill positions are pretty short on first round talent. Then you have a handful of Olineman who do and that's it. The quality is more on the defensive side of the ball this year.
If Emery plays this smart he'll take advantage of selecting positions that aren't deep early and those that are in the middle rounds. If he can add lineman early or a LB on a BPA basis through those first three rounds I think we come out of this looking good. We got some very good skill players who were starters elsewhere in FA and really improved our talent level and depth on that side of the ball.
If we can get our DE in one, pick up an OG like Zeitler or LB like Zach Brown in two or three and a DT like Reyes in two or three and then you add Marshall as that extra 3rd we got for Olsen how good does that look for the front end of a draft?
I'm getting to that age where a lifetime warranty just doesn't mean as much to me anymore as an afternoon nap.
Honey Badger Don't Care. Honey Badger Don't Give a Shit.
-
well so far the only impact player is marshal. I dont consider a backup RB an impact player. So I will wait until after the draft before praising or trashing emery. Plus there is the caveat coming in Lovie is a real power in selection of talent that also needs to be considered and feared. I praise Emery for the Marshal move but since then looks like the same crap JA did. Lets hope the draft is what separates him from JA
-
I'm going to be real depressed when Urlacher & Briggs hang it up. They really have been fun to watch. Its hard to find LBs like them.
-

Originally Posted by
motownbear
well so far the only impact player is marshal. I dont consider a backup RB an impact player. So I will wait until after the draft before praising or trashing emery. Plus there is the caveat coming in Lovie is a real power in selection of talent that also needs to be considered and feared. I praise Emery for the Marshal move but since then looks like the same crap JA did. Lets hope the draft is what separates him from JA
I don't think you can fairly judge him after the draft. Really everyone has this player or that player but besides a select few players who are going well before us (and even those can turn out to be duds) we don't know shit about it being a good draft or not. Some players don't produce like they're going to produce for a year or two or maybe three. How many people thought Mario Williams over Reggie Bush and Vince Young was a good pick? The Texans were ripped on for the pick all offseason and then all year but now that we're a few years removed from that draft everyone sings their praises.
Truth is you can't fairly assess drafts for AT LEAST three years. Sure it might be players the drafniks said would be good but if they knew anything they'd be in the war room. Why did Brandon Marshall and Lance Briggs last till the third round? Or Marques Colston to the seventh? None of us really know and won't know for awhile. He could pick all the people you want him to pick and it could turn out to be a terrible draft.
Last edited by Chi66; 04-23-2012 at 07:10 PM.
-
High Fives / Like - 1 BEAR DOWN!, 0 Dislikes
-

Originally Posted by
motownbear
well so far the only impact player is marshal. I dont consider a backup RB an impact player. So I will wait until after the draft before praising or trashing emery. Plus there is the caveat coming in Lovie is a real power in selection of talent that also needs to be considered and feared. I praise Emery for the Marshal move but since then looks like the same crap JA did. Lets hope the draft is what separates him from JA
Not so much impact player mo. More like massive upgrades to the #2 spots at both RB and QB. Both those guys were starters in Oakland. Weems adds some depth at WR and so does Thomas. They may not be what you'd call difference makers but sure as hell our depth a offensive skill positions is better than last year.
I'm getting to that age where a lifetime warranty just doesn't mean as much to me anymore as an afternoon nap.
Honey Badger Don't Care. Honey Badger Don't Give a Shit.
-

Originally Posted by
motownbear
well so far the only impact player is marshal. I dont consider a backup RB an impact player. So I will wait until after the draft before praising or trashing emery. Plus there is the caveat coming in Lovie is a real power in selection of talent that also needs to be considered and feared. I praise Emery for the Marshal move but since then looks like the same crap JA did. Lets hope the draft is what separates him from JA
I, for one, think it's too early to crucify him, but it's certainly not too early to say that he's made a big splash in free agency and with trades. After all, we did acquire Brandon Marshall, an absolute beast at WR, in a blockbuster trade with Miami, and we did sign Michael Bush and Jason Campbell away from the Oakland Raiders as backups to Matt Forte and Jay Cutler, respectively. I will be very surprised if he does as bad or worse of a job at drafting players than Jerry Angelo. I don't think it's possible to draft worse than Jerry Angelo at all unless you are talking about Matt Millen.