

no bush is always nice, but a small amount is good too
As far as Michael Bush goes, as much as it take to get us a win

I totally agree, he'll get his touches. Ideally, I'd hope to see the Bears give him enough carries so that Forte has 100% fresh legs going into the playoffs. Giving Bush plenty of carries will also keep fresh legs going for both RB's late in games too. And since we have Bush locked up for a 4 year contract, and Forte just signed his long term contract, it should be GREAT for our running game, to not be over-using 1 guy. They both benefit from this situation. Lower mileage on both backs as their careers go on over the next 4 or 5 years.
And defenses facing us, will be going against RB's w/full-strength legs every game, every snap, all season long.
p.s. It's also healthy to have a bit of competition going on here between Forte and Bush. A "pride thing" that drives them both to excel.
Last edited by JustAnotherBearsFan99; 07-29-2012 at 03:18 PM.
Go Bears!

I don't know how he rates as a blocker, but he is fullback sized so ( if he's a good enough blocker ) why not have him in the backfield with Forte a certain % of the time . A dual threat in the backfield is better than the obvious fullback who is nothing more than a blocker.
Also I could see it being a good idea to use him more in the latter half of games where we have a lead - use him to ground and pound, get 1st downs against a tired defense and chew up the clock ( which also saves Forte's legs and the potential for a worthless late game injury ).
Last edited by Blue Horse-shoe; 07-29-2012 at 07:52 PM.
What should you call any : Fumble , Hold , Interception , Three and out , or Sack ?
A " F.H.I.T.S " ? or a J'Marcus ?