-
Did Brian Urlacher Seek Alternative Treatment in May?...............
Taking a shot
Sources: Urlacher turned to alternative therapy before knee scope
Mike Mulligan August 23, 2012
The inexplicable months of delay between Brian Urlacher's left knee injury and an arthroscopic procedure to reduce pain and swelling a little more than a week ago is pretty difficult to understand.
Why would the Bears and Urlacher gamble waiting for the last moments of training camp to clear out a joint that has been a nuisance since New Year's Day?
Two league sources said Urlacher wasn't just biding his time and hoping the injury would heal itself during the offseason. He was chasing down a cure in Europe.
One source said Urlacher left sometime in May or early June to meet with a physician described as "that famous doctor everybody goes to," while the other source said the player opted for "non-invasive treatment" that he paid for himself.
Did Urlacher follow in the footsteps of the Lakers' Kobe Bryant, the Yankees' Alex Rodriguez, superagent Ari Emanuel (brother of Mayor Rahm Emanuel) and even the late Pope John Paul II by seeking help through biological medicine, specifically Regenokine injection therapy?
A Bears spokesman declined to confirm, deny or steer "in one direction or another" when asked whether Urlacher had been to see the practice of German-based Dr. Peter Wehling, credited as the primary founder of Regenokine therapy, a process that has not been approved nationally by the Food and Drug Administration.
Urlacher declined comment when pressed on the matter by a Tribune reporter.
Nobody ever has questioned Urlacher's passion for football. His weight-room workouts are legendary with fitness never a concern throughout his career, now entering its 13th NFL season.
In an interview with HBO's "Real Sports" that aired in January, Urlacher compared taking a pregame shot of the painkiller Toradol with getting a flu shot. He also told the program he would lie to team medical personnel rather than admit he suffered a concussion in order to stay on the field.
The Bears won't comment on the issue because it concerns the private business of a player seeking a medical opinion on his own. Another league source said there isn't even a mechanism in place for teams to give support or advice on the subject of Regenokine therapy because of liability issues resulting from not having FDA approval. Also, teams historically have been reluctant to draw attention to any potential division — no matter how small — in the way injuries are treated by the team versus a player's independent thinking.
Urlacher's reluctance to discuss the matter is difficult to pinpoint, but he does have a lot at stake. He is in the final year of his contract, scheduled to make $8 million this season, including a $500,000 workout bonus and $7.5 million in base pay. The Bears haven't stepped forward to give him an extension, understandable patience to see how things go before making an offer. Perhaps he feels bringing a linebacker's mentality to medical treatment might seem desperate to any future suitors. Maybe it's simply that the point is moot because he wound up getting his knee scoped anyway.
Regardless, the more you read about Regenokine therapy, the more you want to try it yourself, providing you can afford the five days the procedure takes and the roughly $7,500 per course for what many sportsmen consider a miracle cure.
As the New York Times has reported, "Wehling's practice has become almost a pilgrimage site for athletes trying to prolong careers that have tested the limits of their bodies." The treatment hasn't been approved by the FDA, according to a source familiar with the agency's thinking, because the FDA isn't crazy about the manipulation of blood product and wants more testing.
The Philadelphia Inquirer reported last week that recently traded NBA center Andrew Bynum of the 76ers is scheduled to go to Germany in early September for the procedure. But if testimony from the likes of Bryant, Grant Hill, golfers Vijay Singh and Fred Couples and actor Nick Nolte isn't enough, you have to love what Wehling wrote about his "first-generation" treatment of Pope John Paul II.
In his book "The End of Pain," co-written with Wehling's L.A.-based partner, Dr. Chris Renna, there is a fascinating account of visits with the pontiff at the Vatican. The Pope had a highly publicized battle with Parkinson's disease and a lesser-known but highly debilitating issue with osteoarthritis. Wehling writes of traveling to Rome and being whisked into the Pope's apartment. A devout Catholic whose great-uncle was the archbishop of Cologne, Wehling asked the Pope why he had sought Regenokine therapy and was told: "Because your treatment comes from God."
Wehling wrote: "He meant that Regenokine procedure uses the body's own healing forces instead of relying upon an extraneous element such as pharmaceutical drug or artificial joint."
Renna, who operates clinics in Santa Monica, Calif., and Dallas, adds a holistic lifestyle approach to the treatment that includes diet and exercise.
The Bears insist there was no new injury to Urlacher's knee in his six days of active participation in training camp. He passed a physical and a conditioning test before playing.
Wehling and Renna write in their book that the success rate in patients is around 70 percent. And there is different pathology with everyone who gets the treatment. Where Bryant had his left knee scoped in 2010 and described his problem as "bone on bone" before getting Regenokine injections in 2011, it was understood to be an arthritic condition.
Urlacher suffered a single traumatic event, the sprain of his medial collateral ligament and posterior cruciate ligament. Could it be that Regenokine injections don't work as well with the violent hits and sudden movement needed to play professional football? Wehling declined to be interviewed for this story, saying through an assistant that he was too busy with patients.
Business clearly is booming. Word has gotten out, whether a certain middle linebacker likes it or not.
I'm getting to that age where a lifetime warranty just doesn't mean as much to me anymore as an afternoon nap.
Honey Badger Don't Care. Honey Badger Don't Give a Shit.
-
-
What should you call any : Fumble , Hold , Interception , Three and out , or Sack ?
A " F.H.I.T.S " ? or a J'Marcus ?
-
Fine with me. Who am I to judge if this is quackery or legit. I'm all for anything that can extend Brian's career as a Chicago Bear playing at a high level.
The Greatest form of revenge is MASSIVE success.
-
So Urlacher is on record saying he would lie to the Bears about a problem. Couple that with reports saying he was had three knee procedures with his denial and claiming it was only one... Perhaps he had two procedures (or more) that are unknown to the Bears.
-
I don't care if they gave him a "monkey foot" voodoo cure or had space aliens give him new legs - as long as the guy gets his butt back on the field and has a great year for us. 
Brian Urlacher
Thanks For The Memories
-
i can see why they didnt discuss a new contract now that this info is out. this treatment is for a 34 year old degenerative knee
-

Originally Posted by
Blue Horse-shoe
So.
Here's an answer Blue.
Why the Urlacher treatment story matters
August, 22, 2012 Aug 22
4:50
PM ET
By Kevin Seifert | ESPN.com
Chicago Bears linebacker Brian Urlacher was given multiple opportunities Wednesday to dispute or provide context to a Chicago Tribune report that he sought alternative treatment in Germany this spring for his troublesome left knee. So was the team. Both declined any comment of substance, other than Urlacher's willingness to confirm he was in Europe "last year" to play the Tampa Bay Buccaneers.

Urlacher
There is some risk in moving forward with anything based only on the absence of denial, but neither Urlacher nor the Bears are naïve. This isn't a minor issue. They would have quashed the story if it were inaccurate. So now the question is this: What does this report mean?
I have a couple of thoughts.
First, it reveals that Urlacher was far more concerned about the condition of his knee this spring than either he or the Bears let on. The narrative we were told, one that became more difficult to believe as time went on, was that Urlacher and the team had agreed to an exceptionally slow timetable in returning from what was diagnosed as a sprain of the MCL and PCL in January.
The treatment identified by the Tribune, known as Regenokine, isn't brand new and has been used by other high-profile athletes. But it has not been approved for use in the United States, and generally speaking, it's safe to assume Urlacher would not have traveled to Europe for treatment if he didn't have significant concerns about his progress.
Those concerns appear justified when the knee swelled after just five days of training camp practices. He has since undergone arthroscopic surgery and has acknowledged he will have to manage his practice time during the season. This latest revelation only enhances the notion that Urlacher is dealing with a significant injury, rather than a nagging one, and casts further doubt on if he'll be effective over a 16-game season.
Second, it's easy to understand why the Bears aren't interested in continued public discussion on the topic. As more information comes to light, it becomes more relevant to question why the team didn't formulate a more extensive backup plan should Urlacher suffer the kind of setback that he ultimately did.
Moving your strongside linebacker to the middle, as the Bears have done with Nick Roach, weakens two of the three linebacker positions. But it's really the Bears' only option after another offseason went by without identifying an heir apparent or even finding a credible backup for a linebacker who is now 34 years old.
According to the Tribune, Urlacher arranged the alternate treatment and paid for it himself. So it's possible the team wasn't fully informed. Perhaps it might have acted differently if it knew. But surely the Bears were aware that Urlacher wasn't happy with his progress. That alone should have been viewed as a warning sign.
The Bears' point Wednesday, in essence, was that what's done is done. In the end, how Urlacher got himself back on the field might not be as important as the fact that he did. But at this sensitive time, when it's not entirely clear what his short- and long-term prognosis is, it's an important piece of information and has been duly noted.
I'm getting to that age where a lifetime warranty just doesn't mean as much to me anymore as an afternoon nap.
Honey Badger Don't Care. Honey Badger Don't Give a Shit.
-
-
Moving your strongside linebacker to the middle, as the Bears have done with
Nick Roach, weakens two of the three linebacker positions.
But it's really the Bears' only option after another offseason went by without identifying an heir apparent or even finding a credible backup for a linebacker who is now 34 years old.
. Jerry Angelo left the team with more holes to fill than Emery could have filled in one off-season. Emery did a great job considering his limited resources. He has put us in a position to have a legitimate shot at winning a Super Bowl this season.
I think they feel they can get this season and at least 1 more good season out of Urlacher, and consequently can bring a draftee into the mix next year. They can sign Brian to a 1 year deal for 2013 and then let him retire a Bear. During that year they can groom the new guy to be his eventual replacement. Brian was playing at an extremely high level until that injury. He has a bit left in the tank. For that matter, even if he's only 80%, I'd say that's better than most LB's in the NFL who are 100%.
I understand the sports media wants to know everything going on behind the scenes. I really don't have a problem if the Bears (and Brian) are a bit guarded with public statements on Brian's off-season. I just want the guy back as soon as possible, and as near 100% healthy as possible.
Seifert needs to chill.
Last edited by JustAnotherBearsFan99; 08-22-2012 at 07:45 PM.
Brian Urlacher
Thanks For The Memories
-
-
High Fives / Like - 3 BEAR DOWN!, 0 Dislikes