-
No, ric. He's had a significantly better o-line as a whole. Jay moving from Denver to Chicago put him in a system that wasn't good at all. Romo has had the same people to work with forever, and the only real changing pieces were RB, but as one went down, another would rise...
-
High Fives / Like - 1 BEAR DOWN!, 0 Dislikes
-
-
Their rb situation behind MBIII was very weak. Their OL sucks Henry watch their games, he is constantly running b/c the pocket doesn't hold. The interior is actually worse then the outside. The Denver OL that was built while Cutler was there was by FAR one of the best OL's at the time, dallas not so much.
-
Junior Member
I guess we will see on Monday.
-
Originally Posted by
mdbearz 
I guess we will see on Monday.
Here's all I ask for Monday. It's not that much.
WRs: catch the damn ball when catch-able
Tice: call a ball control game plan, don't be stupid with Webb
Jay: try not to suck ass...again
-
High Fives / Like - 5 BEAR DOWN!, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by
Riczaj01 Their rb situation behind MBIII was very weak. Their OL sucks Henry watch their games, he is constantly running b/c the pocket doesn't hold. The interior is actually worse then the outside. The Denver OL that was built while Cutler was there was by FAR one of the best OL's at the time, dallas not so much.
Hey there BUDDY, it's me AGAIN, LOL. Why draft a QB that's GOOD with a GOOD OL, and stick him with a SHIT OL and expect him to be good? Even in Denver when he was pressured ( not often) he didn't perform as good? You buy a car thats GREAT on the DRAGSTRIP, you wouldn't expect it to perform on a curcuit, would you? All in FUN
The passion of a few, to rule the many, that's Washington D.C.. Where else was that said before, about whom?
-
Diabetes would kick Romo's candy ass.
-
High Fives / Like - 3 BEAR DOWN!, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by
matsellah Diabetes would kick Romo's candy ass.
As will the BEARS Monday Nite !!!!
TR's #er's
http://www.nfl.com/player/tonyromo/2505354/profile
JC's #er's
http://www.nfl.com/player/jaycutler/2495824/profile
The passion of a few, to rule the many, that's Washington D.C.. Where else was that said before, about whom?
-
So JC 3 more INT's then TR, but 2 less fumbles. You can figure out the rest, good and / or bad, depending on who you like.
The passion of a few, to rule the many, that's Washington D.C.. Where else was that said before, about whom?
-
Junior Member
Originally Posted by
JustAnotherBearsFan99 This should spur some good debate
BEHIND THIS LINE Romo would still be getting scraped up from 4 years ago
-
Originally Posted by
yttocs Hey there BUDDY, it's me AGAIN, LOL. Why draft a QB that's GOOD with a GOOD OL, and stick him with a SHIT OL and expect him to be good? Even in Denver when he was pressured ( not often) he didn't perform as good? You buy a car thats GREAT on the DRAGSTRIP, you wouldn't expect it to perform on a curcuit, would you? All in FUN
Y not sure what you disagree w/but I basically said that Romo and Cutler are both reallyl similar, but i'd give a slight edge to Romo for his ball security and his ability to avoid a rush behind a garbage OL. Just looking at the first 2years of Romo in Dallas to Cutler in Den(taking away chicago's bad ol no weapons and crappy oc's), and Romo is still got a better td to int ratio, while completiting abourt the same % of passes and similar yards.
Again(imo you can disagree if you'd like) I'll take the guy that is still going be safter w/the ball while still allowing his team the oppertunity to score then the guy that is guaranteed to throw a few picks
"trying to win". W/these two qb's it is all taste and what you want, neither is elite but both are franchise guys.
-
High Fives / Like - 1 BEAR DOWN!, 0 Dislikes
yttocs say BEAR DOWN!
__
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote