-
Ugly, frustrating win. But a win's a win. The Packers looked bad in winning a relatively close game at home against a horrible team, too, although theirs wasn't nearly as close (and the team was much, much worse). Still, it's another week we stayed 2 up on them and another week closer to a division title. I hope this was a wake-up call for the team, because clearly they didn't come to play today.
Last edited by Rogelio; 10-28-2012 at 04:51 PM.
-
-

Originally Posted by
Henry Burris
Jimmors, do you still have the Dilfer does not approve meme?
I'm trying//to let go//of maybe//but maybe's just so//very interesting//Oh, what a thing.
-
High Fives / Like - 1 BEAR DOWN!, 0 Dislikes
-

Originally Posted by
dinwitty
I knew you couldnt take even a 1-5 Panthers for granted, their out for the win, I still don't think Bears offensive is quite in order. But the defense kept the panthers out of the endzone, but a funny squib kick saved the bears, 6 yard kick? hardehar. Thats football.
Panthers were just asking for trouble by squib kicking it all game, and this is what happens when you try to be too clever...karma catches up and gives you a 6 yard punt.
I'm trying//to let go//of maybe//but maybe's just so//very interesting//Oh, what a thing.
-
High Fives / Like - 1 BEAR DOWN!, 0 Dislikes
-
We got by, and Cutler has shown he can make a comeback in a seemingly hopeless game. We need to try that no huddle more, tho. It was the best use of offense all friggin day. Idk how many more weeks we can give tice/cutler/bates a pass, because they are "just settling in"? It's obvious Cutler is going to Marshall so much, because his TE's are not that reliable. Not to mention junkass hester. Honestly, get bennett and sanz more involved w the passing game, so that Cutler has more people he trusts, to throw to. Still don't understand not doing more checkoff dumps to forte tho
-
High Fives / Like - 4 BEAR DOWN!, 0 Dislikes
-

Originally Posted by
Henry Burris
We got by, and Cutler has shown he can make a comeback in a seemingly hopeless game. We need to try that no huddle more, tho. It was the best use of offense all friggin day. Idk how many more weeks we can give tice/cutler/bates a pass, because they are "just settling in"? It's obvious Cutler is going to Marshall so much, because his TE's are not that reliable. Not to mention junkass hester. Honestly, get bennett and sanz more involved w the passing game, so that Cutler has more people he trusts, to throw to. Still don't understand not doing more checkoff dumps to forte tho
Yeah, i agree with the no huddle. In that 2 minute drill...our offense really seemed to click. Cutler was given just enough time to drop back and complete his passes, and they just drove down the field. It seems like when the offense played "normal" pace, we got burned by the Carolina DL, but when we kept it fast paced...we moved the ball very well.
Im not saying they need to run no huddle all the time, but i think it would be worth the practice time to use in situations like this, when our OL is struggling and pressure is getting to Cutler.
I'm trying//to let go//of maybe//but maybe's just so//very interesting//Oh, what a thing.
-
High Fives / Like - 2 BEAR DOWN!, 0 Dislikes
-
Junior Member

Originally Posted by
Henry Burris
We got by, and Cutler has shown he can make a comeback in a seemingly hopeless game. We need to try that no huddle more, tho. It was the best use of offense all friggin day. Idk how many more weeks we can give tice/cutler/bates a pass, because they are "just settling in"? It's obvious Cutler is going to Marshall so much, because his TE's are not that reliable. Not to mention junkass hester. Honestly, get bennett and sanz more involved w the passing game, so that Cutler has more people he trusts, to throw to. Still don't understand not doing more checkoff dumps to forte tho
Yup, yup, yup. I would love to see the numbers on the Bear's success with the 2 TE set vs the 3 wide. Bennett seems a superior player. Neither TE seems even as good as average to lower level NFL starter. I like the idea of getting superior players on the field. Now 3rd and 1, maybe no, but 1st and 10, 2nd and 6 etc., why not lots and lots of Bennett.
-
I see some freed cap space this offseason with spaeth and maybe davis gone. Davis has had only one good game, and that aint enough. I like the idea of a 3 wide set, as long as they are quick passes, or we trick them and run the ball. Not like both of our TE's are gonna be worth a damn blocking...
-
Junior Member
One big thing that stands out this team finds ways to win and that was 2006//don't know why it took so long to get a rhythm on offense //seems to me the offensive line needs to have a quicker package or obvious negates for pass rushes//the panthers wanted this game and i think using what the defense gives you as well as calling plays to take advantage of those pass rushes would make the game easier
-

Originally Posted by
RochBear
Yup, yup, yup. I would love to see the numbers on the Bear's success with the 2 TE set vs the 3 wide. Bennett seems a superior player. Neither TE seems even as good as average to lower level NFL starter. I like the idea of getting superior players on the field. Now 3rd and 1, maybe no, but 1st and 10, 2nd and 6 etc., why not lots and lots of Bennett.
When they went to Bennet, he looked GOOD, to bad he hurt his back on the drop/ miss. After that he was gone again.
The passion of a few, to rule the many, that's Washington D.C.. Where else was that said before, about whom?
-
-
High Fives / Like - 3 BEAR DOWN!, 0 Dislikes