-
Current oline rankings: Bears Pass blocking = 32nd. Run blocking = 16th.
On pass plays Cutler better be firing the ball out of there quick. As another poster pointed out today, even our max-protect schemes are not bullet proof.
LINK to the article 2012 OFFENSIVE LINES - Regular season totals, through Week 9
Revised as of 11/6/2012
Teams are ranked according to Adjusted Line Yards. Based on regression analysis, the Adjusted Line Yards formula
takes all running back carries and assigns responsibility to the offensive line based on the following percentages:
- Losses: 120% value
- 0-4 Yards: 100% value
- 5-10 Yards: 50% value
- 11+ Yards: 0% value
These numbers are then adjusted based on down, distance, situation, opponent, and the difference in rushing average between shotgun compared to standard formations. Finally, we normalize the numbers so that the league average for Adjusted Line Yards per carry is the same as the league average for RB yards per carry. These stats are explained furtherhere.
The following stats are not adjusted for opponent:
- RB Yards: Yards per carry by that team's running backs, according to standard NFL numbers.
- Power Success: Percentage of runs on third or fourth down, two yards or less to go, that achieved a first down or touchdown. Also includes runs on first-and-goal or second-and-goal from the two-yard line or closer. This is the only statistic on this page that includes quarterbacks
. - Stuffed: Percentage of runs where the running back is tackled at or behind the line of scrimmage. Since being stuffed is bad, teams are ranked from stuffed least often (#1) to most often (#32).
- Second Level Yards: Yards which this team's running backs earn between 5-10 yards past the line of scrimmage, divided by total running back carries.
- Open Field Yards: Yards which this team's running backs earn more than 10 yards past the line of scrimmage, divided by total running back carries.
NFL averages for each stat given in red.
Why are these rankings different from the team offense DVOA ratings for rushing? Among other reasons, they don't include quarterbacks or fumbles, long runs are truncated, and a different set of adjustments is used, attempting to isolate line play rather than total team offense.
A team with a high ranking in Adjusted Line Yards but a low ranking in Open Field Yards is heavily dependent on its offensive line to make the running game work. A team with a low ranking in Adjusted Line Yards but a high ranking in Open Field Yards is heavily dependent on its running back breaking long runs to make the running game work.
However, it is important to understand that these ratings only somewhat separate the offensive line from the running backs. A team with a very good running back will appear higher no matter how bad their line, and a team with a great line with appear lower if the running back is terrible.
Stats in blue represent pass blocking. Teams are ranked according to Adjusted Sack Rate, which gives sacks (plus intentional grounding penalties) per pass attempt adjusted for down, distance, and opponent. Pass blocking stats are explained further here. Our sack totals may differ slightly from official NFL totals depending on the league's retroactive statistical adjustments.egular season totals, through Week 9 nts. | RUN BLOCKING | PASS PROTECTION |
| Team | Adj. Line
Yards | RB
Yards | Power
Success | Power
Rank | Stuffed | Stuffed
Rank | 2nd Level
Yards | 2nd Level
Rank | Open Field
Yards | Open Field
Rank | Team | Rank | Sacks | Adjusted
Sack Rate |
| 1 | SF | 5.10 | 5.31 | 67% | 11 | 15% | 4 | 1.68 | 1 | 0.93 | 9 | DEN | 1 | 10 | 3.7% |
| 2 | BAL | 4.68 | 4.70 | 70% | 8 | 13% | 1 | 1.37 | 6 | 0.78 | 15 | NYG | 2 | 9 | 3.7% |
| 3 | MIN | 4.45 | 5.38 | 62% | 18 | 22% | 25 | 1.42 | 4 | 1.65 | 1 | DAL | 3 | 14 | 3.7% |
| 4 | SEA | 4.43 | 4.52 | 65% | 12 | 15% | 2 | 1.32 | 8 | 0.65 | 21 | BUF | 4 | 11 | 4.1% |
| 5 | BUF | 4.40 | 5.38 | 44% | 30 | 15% | 5 | 1.45 | 2 | 1.23 | 5 | NE | 5 | 14 | 4.4% |
| 6 | NE | 4.34 | 4.59 | 61% | 20 | 18% | 11 | 1.43 | 3 | 0.89 | 12 | HOU | 6 | 10 | 4.5% |
| 7 | DET | 4.34 | 4.06 | 44% | 31 | 15% | 7 | 1.22 | 14 | 0.31 | 31 | CLE | 7 | 14 | 4.5% |
| 8 | NYG | 4.32 | 4.47 | 69% | 9 | 19% | 17 | 1.19 | 16 | 0.94 | 8 | TB | 8 | 11 | 4.5% |
| 9 | SD | 4.31 | 4.08 | 71% | 7 | 15% | 8 | 1.07 | 22 | 0.60 | 22 | DET | 9 | 15 | 4.6% |
| 10 | HOU | 4.25 | 4.08 | 65% | 13 | 19% | 18 | 1.19 | 15 | 0.59 | 24 | TEN | 10 | 17 | 4.8% |
| 11 | CIN | 4.20 | 3.87 | 77% | 4 | 15% | 6 | 0.89 | 30 | 0.58 | 25 | MIA | 11 | 15 | 4.9% |
| 12 | NYJ | 4.18 | 3.90 | 94% | 1 | 15% | 3 | 0.89 | 29 | 0.59 | 23 | NO | 12 | 15 | 5.0% |
| 13 | TB | 4.16 | 5.07 | 50% | 28 | 21% | 24 | 1.27 | 12 | 1.53 | 2 | OAK | 13 | 14 | 5.1% |
| 14 | DEN | 4.11 | 4.07 | 64% | 15 | 19% | 15 | 1.11 | 18 | 0.55 | 27 | SEA | 14 | 15 | 5.7% |
| 15 | WAS | 4.11 | 4.72 | 57% | 24 | 18% | 10 | 1.41 | 5 | 0.96 | 6 | IND | 15 | 19 | 6.2% |
| 16 | CHI | 4.10 | 4.34 | 67% | 10 | 21% | 23 | 1.27 | 13 | 0.89 | 13 | ATL | 16 | 18 | 6.4% |
| RUN BLOCKING | PASS PROTECTION |
| Team | Adj. Line
Yards | RB
Yards | Power
Success | Power
Rank | Stuffed | Stuffed
Rank | 2nd Level
Yards | 2nd Level
Rank | Open Field
Yards | Open Field
Rank | Team | Rank | Sacks | Adjusted
Sack Rate |
| 17 | MIA | 4.06 | 4.10 | 56% | 25 | 19% | 16 | 1.10 | 19 | 0.77 | 16 | CAR | 17 | 17 | 6.4% |
| 18 | STL | 4.01 | 4.43 | 64% | 16 | 20% | 21 | 1.32 | 9 | 0.92 | 10 | NYJ | 18 | 19 | 6.5% |
| 19 | NO | 3.99 | 4.19 | 89% | 2 | 19% | 14 | 1.09 | 20 | 0.83 | 14 | BAL | 19 | 19 | 6.5% |
| 20 | JAC | 3.98 | 3.97 | 80% | 3 | 18% | 12 | 0.97 | 26 | 0.70 | 18 | JAC | 20 | 21 | 6.7% |
| 21 | ATL | 3.95 | 3.77 | 38% | 32 | 18% | 9 | 0.96 | 27 | 0.73 | 17 | PIT | 21 | 18 | 6.8% |
| 22 | PIT | 3.92 | 3.91 | 71% | 6 | 18% | 13 | 1.00 | 24 | 0.66 | 19 | KC | 22 | 17 | 6.9% |
| 23 | DAL | 3.83 | 3.82 | 54% | 26 | 22% | 26 | 1.03 | 23 | 0.58 | 26 | WAS | 23 | 21 | 7.1% |
| 24 | CLE | 3.79 | 3.70 | 47% | 29 | 20% | 20 | 1.08 | 21 | 0.38 | 30 | SD | 24 | 20 | 7.6% |
| 25 | PHI | 3.75 | 4.27 | 75% | 5 | 29% | 31 | 1.37 | 7 | 0.91 | 11 | GB | 25 | 29 | 8.0% |
| 26 | IND | 3.75 | 3.74 | 64% | 14 | 24% | 30 | 1.14 | 17 | 0.44 | 29 | STL | 26 | 22 | 8.1% |
| 27 | TEN | 3.72 | 4.68 | 62% | 19 | 20% | 22 | 1.32 | 10 | 1.29 | 3 | CIN | 27 | 22 | 8.1% |
| 28 | GB | 3.55 | 3.29 | 60% | 21 | 19% | 19 | 0.79 | 32 | 0.27 | 32 | PHI | 28 | 27 | 8.2% |
| 29 | KC | 3.49 | 4.59 | 63% | 17 | 23% | 28 | 1.32 | 11 | 1.27 | 4 | MIN | 29 | 23 | 8.6% |
| 30 | CAR | 3.05 | 3.56 | 59% | 22 | 23% | 29 | 0.99 | 25 | 0.65 | 20 | SF | 30 | 24 | 9.3% |
| 31 | OAK | 3.04 | 3.60 | 58% | 23 | 23% | 27 | 0.86 | 31 | 0.96 | 7 | ARI | 31 | 41 | 10.1% |
| 32 | ARI | 2.98 | 3.08 | 53% | 27 | 30% | 32 | 0.90 | 28 | 0.45 | 28 | CHI | 32 | 28 | 10.5% |
| x | NFL | x | 4.25 | 63% | x | 19% | x | 1.06 | x | 0.72 | x | NFL | x | 18 | 6.3% |
The second table lists each team's Adjusted Line Yards in each direction listed in official NFL play-by-play, along with rankRevised as of 11/6/2012
Last edited by JustAnotherBearsFan99; 11-09-2012 at 01:49 PM.
-
-
Here's more information from that same source
LINK to the article The second table lists each team's Adjusted Line Yards in each direction listed in official NFL play-by-play, along with rank among the 32 teams. Only five directions are listed because research so far shows
no statistically significant difference between how well a team performs on runs listed middle, left guard, and right guard. | | LEFT END | LEFT TACKLE | MID/GUARD | RIGHT TACKLE | RIGHT END |
| TEAM | ALY | Rank | ALY | Rank | ALY | Rank | ALY | Rank | ALY | Rank |
| 1 | SF | 5.75 | 2 | 4.70 | 7 | 5.06 | 1 | 4.50 | 7 | 6.23 | 2 |
| 2 | BAL | 2.52 | 28 | 4.62 | 9 | 4.63 | 7 | 5.94 | 1 | 4.85 | 10 |
| 3 | MIN | 3.24 | 22 | 4.64 | 8 | 4.57 | 8 | 4.40 | 9 | 4.57 | 14 |
| 4 | SEA | 4.73 | 5 | 4.34 | 13 | 4.13 | 15 | 5.08 | 3 | 3.71 | 21 |
| 5 | BUF | 0.34 | 32 | 4.19 | 14 | 4.91 | 3 | 3.28 | 27 | 6.42 | 1 |
| 6 | NE | 4.60 | 7 | 5.09 | 3 | 4.48 | 9 | 4.25 | 13 | 2.20 | 29 |
| 7 | DET | 2.83 | 24 | 3.46 | 23 | 4.94 | 2 | 4.05 | 17 | 4.62 | 13 |
| 8 | NYG | 4.22 | 12 | 4.08 | 17 | 4.70 | 6 | 4.19 | 14 | 2.54 | 28 |
| 9 | SD | 4.31 | 11 | 3.91 | 20 | 4.27 | 10 | 5.35 | 2 | 3.85 | 20 |
| 10 | HOU | 5.88 | 1 | 3.00 | 27 | 4.10 | 16 | 4.54 | 5 | 4.07 | 18 |
| 11 | CIN | 1.37 | 31 | 3.42 | 25 | 4.81 | 4 | 4.10 | 15 | 4.98 | 7 |
| 12 | NYJ | 3.96 | 15 | 5.26 | 1 | 4.09 | 17 | 4.29 | 11 | 4.77 | 12 |
| 13 | TB | 4.58 | 8 | 5.15 | 2 | 3.70 | 27 | 4.69 | 4 | 4.31 | 15 |
| 14 | DEN | 2.63 | 26 | 2.28 | 30 | 4.72 | 5 | 3.40 | 26 | 5.37 | 5 |
| 15 | WAS | 4.45 | 10 | 3.62 | 22 | 3.99 | 20 | 3.42 | 25 | 4.87 | 9 |
| 16 | CHI | 3.48 | 20 | 3.43 | 24 | 4.09 | 18 | 3.83 | 21 | 5.86 | 3 |
| | LEFT END | LEFT TACKLE | MID/GUARD | RIGHT TACKLE | RIGHT END |
| TEAM | ALY | Rank | ALY | Rank | ALY | Rank | ALY | Rank | ALY | Rank |
| 17 | MIA | 4.65 | 6 | 4.16 | 15 | 4.27 | 11 | 2.75 | 30 | 3.61 | 22 |
| 18 | STL | 4.15 | 13 | 4.41 | 12 | 4.15 | 12 | 3.14 | 28 | 4.94 | 8 |
| 19 | NO | 5.59 | 3 | 4.45 | 11 | 3.85 | 23 | 3.56 | 24 | 3.53 | 23 |
| 20 | JAC | 4.06 | 14 | 4.95 | 4 | 4.15 | 13 | 4.47 | 8 | 2.15 | 31 |
| 21 | ATL | 3.67 | 17 | 3.81 | 21 | 4.06 | 19 | 4.53 | 6 | 3.33 | 24 |
| 22 | PIT | 2.71 | 25 | 4.76 | 6 | 3.85 | 24 | 3.90 | 20 | 4.10 | 17 |
| 23 | DAL | 3.66 | 18 | 4.80 | 5 | 3.96 | 21 | 3.58 | 23 | 2.83 | 27 |
| 24 | CLE | 3.92 | 16 | 3.09 | 26 | 3.89 | 22 | 4.26 | 12 | 5.42 | 4 |
| 25 | PHI | 2.05 | 30 | 4.52 | 10 | 3.41 | 30 | 4.37 | 10 | 4.28 | 16 |
| 26 | IND | 4.49 | 9 | 4.03 | 18 | 3.42 | 29 | 3.95 | 18 | 3.21 | 25 |
| 27 | TEN | 3.52 | 19 | 4.10 | 16 | 3.75 | 26 | 4.08 | 16 | 1.61 | 32 |
| 28 | GB | 2.59 | 27 | 2.84 | 28 | 4.14 | 14 | 2.74 | 32 | 3.88 | 19 |
| 29 | KC | 2.85 | 23 | 1.61 | 31 | 3.77 | 25 | 3.80 | 22 | 4.79 | 11 |
| 30 | CAR | 3.46 | 21 | 0.89 | 32 | 3.46 | 28 | 2.74 | 31 | 3.18 | 26 |
| 31 | OAK | 2.14 | 29 | 3.92 | 19 | 3.12 | 31 | 3.94 | 19 | 2.16 | 30 |
| 32 | ARI | 4.78 | 4 | 2.35 | 29 | 2.53 | 32 | 2.97 | 29 | 5.13 | 6 |
| x | NFL | 3.86 | x | 3.84 | x | 4.14 | x | 4.03 | x | 4.06 | x |
The third table
lists how often each team runs in each direction. Numbers may not add up to 100% due to carries listed without direction. | Team | RB
Carries | LEFT
END | LEFT
TACKLE | MID/
GUARD | RIGHT
TACKLE | RIGHT
END |
| 1 | HOU | 265 | 15% | 17% | 43% | 16% | 10% |
| 2 | NE | 259 | 11% | 15% | 54% | 12% | 9% |
| 3 | SEA | 239 | 8% | 29% | 37% | 22% | 4% |
| 4 | KC | 221 | 19% | 10% | 47% | 16% | 9% |
| 5 | NYG | 219 | 14% | 16% | 49% | 14% | 6% |
| 6 | MIA | 215 | 11% | 18% | 53% | 12% | 7% |
| 7 | CHI | 213 | 8% | 15% | 54% | 12% | 11% |
| 8 | DEN | 205 | 6% | 14% | 58% | 15% | 8% |
| 9 | MIN | 202 | 8% | 9% | 65% | 10% | 7% |
| 10 | SD | 202 | 12% | 13% | 53% | 11% | 10% |
| 11 | NYJ | 198 | 9% | 8% | 62% | 15% | 6% |
| 12 | PIT | 195 | 4% | 11% | 70% | 11% | 4% |
| 13 | TB | 193 | 9% | 18% | 59% | 9% | 6% |
| 14 | GB | 190 | 13% | 14% | 47% | 12% | 14% |
| 15 | SF | 190 | 17% | 14% | 53% | 9% | 6% |
| 16 | BUF | 188 | 5% | 11% | 67% | 13% | 4% |
| Team | RB
Carries | LEFT
END | LEFT
TACKLE | MID/
GUARD | RIGHT
TACKLE | RIGHT
END |
| 17 | WAS | 188 | 21% | 14% | 35% | 13% | 17% |
| 18 | IND | 185 | 21% | 15% | 51% | 5% | 8% |
| 19 | CLE | 184 | 3% | 18% | 60% | 15% | 4% |
| 20 | ATL | 178 | 13% | 8% | 51% | 13% | 14% |
| 21 | ARI | 177 | 8% | 24% | 44% | 15% | 10% |
| 22 | PHI | 175 | 15% | 16% | 27% | 15% | 26% |
| 23 | STL | 174 | 12% | 16% | 36% | 26% | 10% |
| 24 | BAL | 172 | 8% | 14% | 58% | 15% | 6% |
| 25 | DET | 170 | 9% | 16% | 51% | 16% | 7% |
| 26 | DAL | 168 | 14% | 12% | 46% | 18% | 10% |
| 27 | CIN | 167 | 8% | 17% | 50% | 17% | 8% |
| 28 | TEN | 167 | 7% | 12% | 63% | 13% | 5% |
| 29 | OAK | 159 | 18% | 19% | 35% | 15% | 11% |
| 30 | JAC | 158 | 13% | 6% | 63% | 6% | 11% |
| 31 | NO | 155 | 10% | 6% | 63% | 11% | 10% |
| 32 | CAR | 149 | 13% | 11% | 56% | 6% | 13% |
| x | NFL | x | 11% | 14% | 52% | 13% | 9% |
-
DANG!!!
Very last at pass blocking AGAIN. That just HAS to change.
-
-
High Fives / Like - 1 BEAR DOWN!, 0 Dislikes
-
I will probably show my ignorance here, but am I reading that 2nd chart correctly - that we're 3rd best in the NFL running behind Carimi's side?
-

Originally Posted by
JustAnotherBearsFan99
I will probably show my ignorance here, but am I reading that 2nd chart correctly - that we're 3rd best in the NFL running behind Carimi's side?
I didn't read the chart but Carimi and Louis are both great run blockers and Louis is finally living up to his rep as a good pass blocker just as Tice said he was. Now if we can only get Carimi up to that level on pass plays we're getting somewhere.
I'm getting to that age where a lifetime warranty just doesn't mean as much to me anymore as an afternoon nap.
Honey Badger Don't Care. Honey Badger Don't Give a Shit.
-
Junior Member

Originally Posted by
JustAnotherBearsFan99
I will probably show my ignorance here, but am I reading that 2nd chart correctly - that we're 3rd best in the NFL running behind Carimi's side?
This is exactly what I got out of it too; it is one of the only bright spots on this line. That right side may eventually anchor itself with pass blocking and run blocking it is very well according to the stats. The left side needs to be replaced.
-
High Fives / Like - 1 BEAR DOWN!, 0 Dislikes
-

Originally Posted by
inchibearfan
This is exactly what I got out of it too; it is one of the only bright spots on this line. That right side may eventually anchor itself with pass blocking and run blocking it is very well according to the stats. The left side needs to be replaced.
I wish we could break these stats down and look at the last 4 games vs the first 4 games. It seem like the left side may have been better run blocking in recent weeks, once Rachal had been in place a bit. The first few weeks were a disaster on the left side. Now they do look significantly better to me run blocking. In fact, there have been a few plays that were incredible springing Forte. Another thing I wonder about is accounting for plays where one side may pull a guard or tackle. The play may go to the middle or other side, but the key block may come from the opposite side. I have seen some great pulling plays (even from Webb).
Stats are great, but sometimes there is more to the story than the stats alone.
Last edited by JustAnotherBearsFan99; 11-09-2012 at 02:47 PM.
-

Originally Posted by
JustAnotherBearsFan99
I wish we could break these stats down and look at the last 4 games vs the first 4 games. It seem like the left side may have been better run blocking in recent weeks, once Rachal had been in place a bit. The first few weeks were a disaster on the left side. Now they do look significantly better to me run blocking. In fact, there have been a few plays that were incredible springing Forte. Another thing I wonder about is accounting for plays where one side may pull a guard or tackle. The play may go to the middle or other side, but the key block may come from the opposite side. I have seen some great pulling plays (even from Webb).
Stats are great, but sometimes there is more to the story than the stats alone.
Well that's no lie or like they quote goes; "Lies, damn lies, and statistics". They're useful in certain ways but all too often taken out of context.
What is obvious though is that once again this year our line struggles in protection. We don't need those stats to tell us what out eyes can see. We can't in any way, shape, or form be even close to being considered the most complete team in the NFL as long as that issue still exists.
My guess is that Phil Emery simply isn't gonna buy into the "these guys will get better with coaching" argument any longer. He's made some master moves to fill other holes and upgrade our depth and the only glaring weaknesses that still exist are on the line. There's no logical reason to believe that won't be the next are he attempts to fix.
Louis is a keeper and there's no way we replace Carimi this soon so I'd say providing we extend Louis' deal, and we will, those two are out 2013 starters on the right side. We all know that Webb is on borrowed time and though he's improved some it's not nearly enough or happening fast enough to think he's the answer at LT. I'd look for us to make a move in FA next spring.
Rachal may or may not be the guy. It would be much easier to tell if he wasn't playing next to Webb and instead he had a guy like Long or Clady next to him. He's a bull but he's pretty inconsistent too and that was the rap on him while he played in SF. Time will tell but I'd spend a high draft pick on a young stud OG/OC type and let him see if he can beat him out.
Same at OC. Bring in the next generation interior lineman and see whether he plays better at OG or OC and give both Rachal and Garza something to think about.
The time has come (actually it's passed) to spend some $$$ and a high draft pick on that line. Youth and some competition for starts has worked wonders s far as the DLine is concerned so just rinse and repeat that approach with the OLine and maybe by next year we won't be talking about it much anymore or at least not analyzing it in a negative sense.
I'm getting to that age where a lifetime warranty just doesn't mean as much to me anymore as an afternoon nap.
Honey Badger Don't Care. Honey Badger Don't Give a Shit.
-
Junior Member

Originally Posted by
JustAnotherBearsFan99
I will probably show my ignorance here, but am I reading that 2nd chart correctly - that we're 3rd best in the NFL running behind Carimi's side?
Certainly Right End sweeps are 3rd. Off tackle is middle of the league. Carimi presumably has critical assignments on both, but perhaps most on the off tackle runs which the Bears do only all right.
Off of that topic, but ... hey, the pass protect is only last not DEAD last. I mean to say they are within reach of no. 31. I kid, but without stop-watch info, integrated with knowledge of the play calling, the blame may lie mostly with the OL, mostly with Cutler or shared about equally. We seem to have seen signs of each. My eyeball says, mostly OL, some on Cutler.