-
Member
Originally Posted by
omc1969 
Trading a player that was seldom used for a ST "Gunner" was a good deal IMHO. If Tice was not using Clutts then he was just taking up a roster spot. Don't get me wrong, I liked Clutts but if the "OC" isn't going to play him .....................
you know what, I'm totally down with that, if the guy isn't going to be used we should have traded him, and we did. I guess it was the title that threw me off, in no way does one blocked punt make that trade look any different in my eyes. (7 st tackles nothing to write home about either)
-
-
IIRC Casey at FB starts for the Texans. So even though we lost Clutts we weren't exactly giving up a starter. IF McManis can get more pressure on the punter that would be fantastic. McManis (or someone else)NEEDS to take the place of Peanut on ST which I think playing him there is just plain stupid.
Arguing on the internet is like winning the special olympics, even if you win your still messed up.
Restore the roar!
-
High Fives / Like - 2 BEAR DOWN!, 0 Dislikes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
