-
If they beat the Packers, I would have to ask why the HC is not capable of getting his team charged up to win against teams with a winning record unless his job is on the line. His job is to be able to get them charged up for EVERY game.

Originally Posted by
soulman
![36 11 16[1]](/images/smilies/Smilie/36_11_16[1].gif)
Yeah, yeah, yeah let's have this conversation on Monday. That's one big IF you're talking about and having lost what, 8 straight games to them, I'd say the odds aren't in Lovie's favor.
-
-
I've never been a fan of Lovie,I've stated that many times before.
If you are happy with what you are getting from the Bears;keep him.
If not,get him out.
I'm about to the point of not caring,it's that depressing.
Every year,the same hype and BS.
This was Lovie's season to prove himself,has he?
Not to me,just more of the same...
and the same just doesn't get it anymore.
-
High Fives / Like - 1 BEAR DOWN!, 0 Dislikes
-
Junior Member
God this is a sad performance can't get in from da five//i don't know about change but the offense stinks//run the clock out and get off tv geez da bears aren't a very good team even the ref's don't like the bears
-
-
High Fives / Like - 1 BEAR DOWN!, 0 Dislikes
-
Stop w/the Bates bs, please. Get a real OC in here. If you give him a bye for the problems in Sea/Chicago, how do you give him any credit for what happened in Den when he had Shanny to help him? Bates sole purpose for being here was to set up the passing game; how has that worked out? It hasn't. I want a real damned OC in here, not some has been or never was.
Tice does need to go, I agree w/that, but the whole staff needs to go, Smith on down need to go, and that includes the guy that installed this sorry ass passing game; Bates.
-
High Fives / Like - 2 BEAR DOWN!, 0 Dislikes
-

Originally Posted by
Riczaj01
Stop w/the Bates bs, please. Get a real OC in here. If you give him a bye for the problems in Sea/Chicago, how do you give him any credit for what happened in Den when he had Shanny to help him? Bates sole purpose for being here was to set up the passing game; how has that worked out? It hasn't. I want a real damned OC in here, not some has been or never was.
Tice does need to go, I agree w/that, but the whole staff needs to go, Smith on down need to go, and that includes the guy that installed this sorry ass passing game; Bates.
OK Ric, then you tell me just how you plan to get anyone better to take the job with only a one year commitment. Tell me, I'll wait!
The only way you get another is to either extend Lovie before next season (bad idea) or fire him after this season (maybe an even worse idea) and bring in a whole new coaching staff. Use your brain brother. Who in the fuck is gonna leave the team they're with to come here with Lovie on a one year leash? If not Bates then all you get as far as candidates are guys like Martz who have failed elsewhere and have no job or a college guy whose an up and comer.
If you have a better idea let's see your "A" list of OCs you think would be willing to sign on for a year and install their offense in win or else one year shot. I love it when you lay out the criticism but you never have any better answers. That's an easy bitch isn't it. If you're gonna knock my suggestion let's hear yours!
You know jack shit about Jeremy Bates and the work he did here in Denver yet you keep saying it was mostly Shanahan and not Bates. Well I saw it differently and I saw it first hand. How about you? Bates did not install his passing game. What you've been seeing is a Mike Tice offense not a Jeremy Bates offense. All Bates has been has been a liaison between Tice and Cutler.
Actually the part of the passing game that included Marshall has worked. If we'd have had an effective #2 and used Bennett more when he wasn't injured it may have worked better. But then there's also the matter of Mike Tice's OLine too isn't there. When Bates coached in Denver the line was able to protect Cutler and the TEs were a big part of the passing game. The fact that they haven't been this year is another indicator that his isn't Bates way of running an offense.
Ric your whole problem is that you make most of these arguments with only half the knowledge and thought that needs to go into them. You want another guy other than Bates fine! Gimme a list. In fact give us all a list of names and if you will also include the reasons why you think that guy would leave his current team to take over this sorry bunch with a great bunch of skill players but no offensive line for them to work behind.
Like I said, I'm waiting.
I'm getting to that age where a lifetime warranty just doesn't mean as much to me anymore as an afternoon nap.
Honey Badger Don't Care. Honey Badger Don't Give a Shit.
-
High Fives / Like - 1 BEAR DOWN!, 0 Dislikes
-
Junior Member
Here is something to bounce around? Would we be better with martz as oc than the guru?
-

Originally Posted by
claymore58
I've never been a fan of Lovie,I've stated that many times before.
If you are happy with what you are getting from the Bears;keep him.
If not,get him out.
I'm about to the point of not caring,it's that depressing.
Every year,the same hype and BS.
This was Lovie's season to prove himself,has he?
Not to me,just more of the same...
and the same just doesn't get it anymore.
That's pretty much the way I see it too claymore. I've stopped watching the games because I can't stand reruns and each succeeding week has been nothing but a rerun of the previous ever since the Houston game.
I expected it to take 5 or 6 games for the offense to get consistent but I don't think anyone expected it to get worse as the season progressed instead of better. They've completely lost any and all belief that they can execute what they're being asked to and win a game themselves without significant help from the defense.
You can't beat anyone on a TD and FG or two per game and that's all they've been capable of doing now for the last month or so. The defense bailed them out in the first Minnesota game or they may not have won that one either! I've seen some pretty pathetic Bears offenses over the years but never one this pathetic from a team with this much talent at QB and the other skill positions.
If Mike Martz was a failure at getting the most out of what he had to work with, and now looking at the additions that were made since then, I'd say that Mike Tice has been an unmitigated disaster as an OC. Just 190 yards in total offense? Hell you'd think we had Henry Burris at QB instead of Jay Cutler. They're not even close to a competent offense.
I won't have any regrets if Lovie is let go but I won't have any more regrets if Emery decides to give him just one last year to succeed provided all say in the needed offensive coaching changes are not Lovie's to make. He's had nine years to put a decent offense on the field to pair with his defense and he's failed. He simply cannot find a competent OC so let's stop going down that road.
FWIW I believe that there are great offensive minds that simply won't come to Chicago while he's the HC. I don't claim to know all of the reasons for it but every time we've been searching we get turned down by the top candidates on our list. Bates turned us down three years ago before agreeing to come back in a secondary role and if I remember correctly the top three guys we approached last spring all turned us down before Tice finally got it by default and as much out of desperation as anything.
I still say if Lovie stays then Bates is likely to be the best and probably the only option. If we want another then Lovie will have to go. I honestly believe there are guys that simply will not come here to work for him and it may be that the Rivera deal years ago is the reason why. There's an aloofness and a stubborn hardheadedness in the man that I believe turns some coaches off in the same fashion that it has turned many fans off, myself included.
Last edited by soulman; 12-16-2012 at 05:42 PM.
I'm getting to that age where a lifetime warranty just doesn't mean as much to me anymore as an afternoon nap.
Honey Badger Don't Care. Honey Badger Don't Give a Shit.
-
Regarding Bates as OC, I'm ok - IF - he's the best we can get to come here. He has to be an upgrade over Tice. I hope anyway.
We've had to settle for crap OC's for years now - and maybe Bates will work out. Soul, I do see what you're getting at. If they keep Lovie for one more year, and with him on thin ice (probably 1 year from being fired) then we won't get anyone to come in as OC. Just crappy OC's like we've had for years.
-
Well Soul, you don't let lovie coach another year. You seem under the assumption that he will be back regardless, and I don't. I thought he had to make it to the playoffs this year, minimum, and now that is serioulsy in doubt. All words from HH is that it's Emery's call on if he stays or goes, Mck's are not going to have a say in it, they are not going to tie Emery's hands. I don't think for one moment that Lovie is brought back in the final year of his contract w/how he has melted down in Dec(over his entire tenure and ecspeically in the last few years), I don't think for a moment that he is brought back when he has proven that he cannot beat the primary team you have to when trying to get to the playoffs(GB). Why do you bring that HC back, let alone his entire staff? Emery now has all the reason he needs to bring in HIS HC, HIS staff, bring in someone that will want to develop HIS type of players. Why risk all that for one extra year of Lovie and his failed OC's?
IF he were to keep Lovie, then I would take Toub off ST's over Bates. Toub is a promising young mind and is looked at as a potential HC some day; Bates isn't. Toub has shown promise and imagination, Bates has shown failure. AND if Lovie is brought back, only to fail again, BUT Toub shows growth and promise in the O, you might well have your new HC right here(not that I think he would, but he could).
This is not Tices pass game, it's a blend of Tice and Bates, Tices deep passing game from Minny, and Bates WCO passing game for everything else.
Camp Tour 2012, Bates is the key conduit to the passing game; Tice will use him liberally; he'll use Bates knowledge of the WCO, and Tices down field O from when he was in Minny:
http://espn.go.com/blog/chicago/bear...e-as-o-manager
Guess what here's an article specifically stating it was Shanny's O not bates:
http://www.windycitygridiron.com/201...-1-the-bootleg
2nd paragraph, first sentance: "Before the Xs and Os, let's deal with the obvious. Jeremy Bates wasn't the mastermind of the Broncos' offense, Mike Shanahan was." But you have all the knowledge and I'm just going half cocked right? You really telling me that Shanny let a rookie OC install his own O when Shanny's O was never an issue? Doesn't sound logical that an Offensive minded HC is going to let a guy that has never been an OC go in and change the O game plan around. And by all accounts he didn't. I'm sure if I wanted to I could dig through other Den articles that show the same.
But lets look at that year: Ya that was his 4500 yards year, but it was also when he threw 616 times previously it was no more the mid 466's, he should have thrown for more yards. But his YPA was down In Nearly 150 more attempts he only threw 5 more td's, and he also threw four more picks(which is good); he had his worst QBR in Denver under Bates dipping 2 full poitns, had his 2nd worse passing %, and had his 2nd worse yards per pass %. Bates wasn't some kind of Cutler/Marshal mastermind. Bates failed in Sea, and his job was to set up the passing game here and it's been a failure. Those are facts, undisputable facts.