Thread: Why Tebow could end up as a Bear

Originally Posted by TheBaschnagelnator

Oh, absolutely. Considering all things, that was still a bangin' choice, sir.

Daniel Bryan is pretty over with the current wrestling fans. Once in awhile, I'll sit and wat- ...err, ask others why they still watch that silly wrestling junk.

lol...yeah i used to watch wrestling as a kid and a teen. But then i grew up HA!

But yeah, i have one FB friend who is my age (30 something) who is still gaga over that stuff and goes on and on about "OMG DID YOU SEE WHAT CM PUNK DID TO WHATSHIS FACE!!!" and i have to remind him that its all scripted. (i respect wrestlers for the physical shit they do...but the drama and "storylines" are fake as hell)

I still think Tebow as backup wouldn't be the worst option. Very different to Cutler.

What I don't like would be the conversation that would come with him and Jay having a bad game. Many would freak out and would want Tebow to start. Media loves Tebow and he would sit behind their #1 hated QB.

Originally Posted by Jimmors i respect wrestlers for the physical shit they do...but the drama and "storylines" are fake as hell

How about we take Tim Tebow and shove him up in the ass? Atleast when talking about QB, he has no place in the NFL one word describes him OVERRATED. Hater or not Tim Tebow sucks.

I wouldn't want to see him in a Bears jersery unless he comes free then we can give him the returner duty and use him as a meatshield somehow.

Originally Posted by Jimmors

lol...yeah i used to watch wrestling as a kid and a teen. But then i grew up HA!

But yeah, i have one FB friend who is my age (30 something) who is still gaga over that stuff and goes on and on about "OMG DID YOU SEE WHAT CM PUNK DID TO WHATSHIS FACE!!!" and i have to remind him that its all scripted. (i respect wrestlers for the physical shit they do...but the drama and "storylines" are fake as hell)

Ya know, I began watching it in the 1980's, with Hogan... then in the late 90's it got good again with Steve Austin and Rock, so I was re-hooked. My personal opinion is that the overall product today is very average-to-sometimes unwatchable - with pinches of greatness every once in a blue moon. At this point, its purely a habit. I dont actively seek it out, nor am I excited when Monday night rolls around. It's just a routine now; if I'm home and surfing the channels, sometimes I leave it on. You know what I mean?

Originally Posted by TheBaschnagelnator

Ya know, I began watching it in the 1980's, with Hogan... then in the late 90's it got good again with Steve Austin and Rock, so I was re-hooked. My personal opinion is that the overall product today is very average-to-sometimes unwatchable - with pinches of greatness every once in a blue moon. At this point, its purely a habit. I dont actively seek it out, nor am I excited when Monday night rolls around. It's just a routine now; if I'm home and surfing the channels, sometimes I leave it on. You know what I mean?

Yeah, 90s were pretty entertaining when WCW was challenging WWF

Frankly, I've watched the kid play, and I really don't see him being "as bad" as some of you suggest, but he certainly isn't "as good" as some of his groupies say. I think a lot of the hate is based on his religious beliefs and think that's wrong. There are players in this league that are absolute bastards, criminals and thugs, and they are given a pass by media and fans, but when a kid expresses something that many would consider "good", he is ridiculed for it. If you watch, there are as many haters that follow him as there are groupies. For whatever reason, this kid is a freaking lighting rod, and for that reason alone, I would tend to stay away, but with all else being ignored and focusing solely on his abilities, I do not think he is so bad that he would not make a good back-up. Perhaps Campbell would be a better back-up under Trestman (even though he sucked this year), but he will likely cost 4 times as much also.