-

Originally Posted by
GermansbombedPH
Sebastian Vollmer
We have 3 RT options on the roster already but hell, that guy is a beast as RT.
I think the best reply I can make to this comment..DITTO!
The Greatest form of revenge is MASSIVE success.
-
High Fives / Like - 1 BEAR DOWN!, 0 Dislikes
-
-
Hadn't thought about gonzalez. He probably wouldn't be rediculously expensive. I could handle that.
-
Tony Gonzalez is retiring so not sure he going to be any help
-
High Fives / Like - 1 BEAR DOWN!, 0 Dislikes
-
yeah if gonzalez plays another year, its gonna be with ATL... he's not gonna want to learn a whole new playbook just to play 1 more year (his 17th lol). Also, why would he come to a team that (realistically) has LESS of a shot of winning a Superbowl in his last year in the game?
That being said, I'm over analyzing for this thread... so I dunno... Greg Jennings? It'd be nice to steal the Packers star WR in FA and beat them to death with him.
Last edited by AtomicTommy; 01-22-2013 at 12:57 PM.
-
High Fives / Like - 1 BEAR DOWN!, 0 Dislikes
-
Member
-
How about so Honey Bears.
-
High Fives / Like - 2 BEAR DOWN!, 0 Dislikes
-
Ryan Clady. He'd be so prohibitively expensive that he's a "luxury" for sure. Of course Clady is sure no J'Marcus Webb. 
Clady probably doesn't have T-shirt sales and a "Clady Nation" following.
Last edited by JustAnotherBearsFan99; 01-23-2013 at 12:16 PM.
-
High Fives / Like - 2 BEAR DOWN!, 0 Dislikes
-
Again, luxury meaning, not a needed player. We all know we don't need more wrs, i'm just meaning "wh would be nice to have?"
-
Gotta say, cheerleaders are a very interesting choice....
"Professional Armchair Quarterback" and other oxymora.....
-
High Fives / Like - 2 BEAR DOWN!, 0 Dislikes
-

Originally Posted by
Henry Burris
Again, luxury meaning, not a needed player. We all know we don't need more wrs, i'm just meaning "wh would be nice to have?"
well, you talked about FAs...