Facebook Twitter

View Poll Results: What's the best option for 2013?

Voters
29. You may not vote on this poll
  • Re-sign Jason Campbell

    2 6.90%
  • Sign a Veteran Free Agent

    3 10.34%
  • Draft a Developmental Quarterback

    6 20.69%
  • Re-Sign Josh McCown and Continue to Develop Matt Blanchard

    18 62.07%
Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 41

Thread: 4 Options to Back Up Cutler

  1. #11
    Certified Oline Zealot JustAnotherBearsFan99's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Ditkaville, Illinois
    Posts
    5,177
    Bear Bucks
    33,916
    Post Thanks / Like
    Items 63
Gift received at 04-16-2013, 02:27 PM from weneedmorelinemen
Message: Here you go, buddy.  Wear it with pride.GameballBears Head LogoGeorge Halas
    Quote Originally Posted by 4DaBERS View Post
    I picked #4, NOT because I like McCown, but because I like Blanchard. I really can't even give you a reason except that he's a winner and even our poor previous coaching staff saw something good in him. I think Campbell is overpriced at this point. He looked terribly gun-shy when he played this year. I know he was just trying to be careful with the ball, but that can go overboard as well.
    Blanchard needs to be developed.

    He has everything to be a solid NFL starting QB, but needs a coach like Trestman to help him take that last step. Blanchard has all of the physical attributes to run a Trestman offense. He certainly is a winner. As a starting QB at the University of Wisconsin-Whitewater they were unbeaten during his three seasons there (45-0).

    He helped those teams win three National Championships.


    He was a machine there. He took apart opposing defenses with surgical precision. His senior year alone, he completed 72% of his passes, and passed for 21 TD's and only 2 ints. He is a very smart, accurate passer who takes care of the ball.

    I think he may end up being a better NFL quarterback than Cutler, if Trestman will develop the kid.

    Last edited by JustAnotherBearsFan99; 01-22-2013 at 09:41 AM.
    Brian Urlacher
    Thanks For The Memories


  2. BEAR DOWN! JPosh2012, darkarius, omc1969 say BEAR DOWN!
  • #12
    Senior Member MPBears68's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Scottsdale, AZ
    Posts
    2,468
    Bear Bucks
    21,714
    Post Thanks / Like
    For the BR this is a decent article that talks about legit options. Don't care how you slice it, you need a plausible #2 QB. It's not optional. Especially with our OL woes and Cutler's injury/concussion history. The Packers were extremely lucky to get through this year with only a completely inexperienced sucky udfa backing up Rodgers. The guy was so unreliable that he fumbled a snap trying to hand off one of the few plays he was in there and was instantly re-benched. I don't want to see the Bears repeat the Collins-Hanie fiasco. Doesn't matter who it is, but the backup QB has to be decent enough to win a game or two if he is called upon to start (beat mediocre competition anyway).

    Jason Campbell SUCKED this year. Part of it was coaching, part of it was a terrible OL, yada yada. But he was also just plain bad and way overpaid. I don't see keeping him without a major pay cut. The only vet FA not on the team I would consider is Matt Moore. He's a decent #2 man and has won games. If.....the price is right though. Frankly, if the vet FA market is too pricey and no young guy is "ready" yet, I'd rather just keep McCown. He's vet min cheap and he's been here.

    So much of this depends upon Blanchard. After a year on the PS and an offseason working with MT, can he be ready by September to be a #2??? Maybe. If not, then he's a #3 (and prob back on the PS). Back to square one.

    Don't kid yourself that any QB we draft (5th at the earliest given so many other needs we have) or sign as a udfa is going to be anything but a long range project. At best that guy might stick as a #3 but more likely he'll be battling for a PS position. The last QB we drafted in the 5th was so non-NFL-material that he was passed over for a guy who was out of the league and coaching high school.

  • #13
    Member omc1969's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Northern Wisconsin
    Posts
    595
    Bear Bucks
    10,076
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by JustAnotherBearsFan99 View Post
    Blanchard needs to be developed.

    He has everything to be a solid NFL starting QB, but needs a coach like Trestman to help him take that last step. Blanchard has all of the physical attributes to run a Trestman offense. He certainly is a winner. As a starting QB at the University of Wisconsin-Whitewater they were unbeaten during his three seasons there (45-0).

    He helped those teams win three National Championships.


    He was a machine there. He took apart opposing defenses with surgical precision. His senior year alone, he completed 72% of his passes, and passed for 21 TD's and only 2 ints. He is a very smart, accurate passer who takes care of the ball.

    I think he may end up being a better NFL quarterback than Cutler, if Trestman will develop the kid.

    I saw a couple of Blanchard's games and was impressed. He's the kind of QB that Trestman can develop into a really good player. Now this all depends on how Trestman sees him though.
    Last edited by omc1969; 01-22-2013 at 10:55 AM.

  • #14
    Member Shark86x's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    606
    Bear Bucks
    9,558
    Post Thanks / Like
    Cut Campbell, he just plain blew chunks (ha! that's my new nickname for Campbell - Chunky Soup!) keep McCown, move Matt to #3 and develop him. MAYBE draft a QB if we can get a steal late, but we have too many holes to fill to waste a pick. I don't think there are any FA QBs for a #2 at a reasonable price so I see the only option as the last one on the poll list.

  • BEAR DOWN! motownbear say BEAR DOWN!
  • #15
    Senior Member MPBears68's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Scottsdale, AZ
    Posts
    2,468
    Bear Bucks
    21,714
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Shark86x View Post
    Cut Campbell, he just plain blew chunks (ha! that's my new nickname for Campbell - Chunky Soup!) keep McCown, move Matt to #3 and develop him. MAYBE draft a QB if we can get a steal late, but we have too many holes to fill to waste a pick. I don't think there are any FA QBs for a #2 at a reasonable price so I see the only option as the last one on the poll list.
    Thats what I voted for too. It's also the cheapest option for us. I hope Blanchard can become something because I'd rather use our draft picks elsewhere.

  • BEAR DOWN! JustAnotherBearsFan99 say BEAR DOWN!
  • #16
    Certified Oline Zealot JustAnotherBearsFan99's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Ditkaville, Illinois
    Posts
    5,177
    Bear Bucks
    33,916
    Post Thanks / Like
    Items 63
Gift received at 04-16-2013, 02:27 PM from weneedmorelinemen
Message: Here you go, buddy.  Wear it with pride.GameballBears Head LogoGeorge Halas
    At some point, the franchise HAS to be able to develop its own talent on offense. If Blanchard isn't the guy to begin with, then pick somebody who CAN be developed. But the Chicago Bears franchise needs to be able to develop player talent. We've been an absolute abortion on offense in our failure to develop young players. Not just at QB, but at all of the positions on offense, other than at RB.

    In fact, many times, players have regressed on offense once they come here from other teams. It was arguably the #1 indictment of the Lovie Smith years. Critical failure.
    Last edited by JustAnotherBearsFan99; 01-22-2013 at 01:37 PM.
    Brian Urlacher
    Thanks For The Memories


  • BEAR DOWN! blinddeafmute, MPBears68, 4DaBERS say BEAR DOWN!
  • #17
    Member Shark86x's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    606
    Bear Bucks
    9,558
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by JustAnotherBearsFan99 View Post
    At some point, the franchise HAS to be able to develop its own talent on offense. If Blanchard isn't the guy to begin with, then pick somebody who CAN be developed. But the Chicago Bears franchise needs to be able to develop player talent. We've been an absolute abortion on offense in our failure to develop young players. Not just at QB, but at all of the positions on offense, other than at RB.

    In fact, many times, players have regressed on offense once they come here from other teams. It was arguably the #1 indictment of the Lovie Smith years. Critical failure.
    100% true and accurate, BUT those days are over. At least, I choose to believe that. All our crappy offensive offense coaches are gone. There is no reason we can't now develop the talent we have. Including Blanchard, who looks to me like he has real potential. Of course, I thought the same about Hanie - until it really mattered.

    At this point, and with so many needs in FA and the draft, I just can't see using a pick on another prospect QB when we have one on the roster. I want to see what Trest and his crew can do with Blanchard. And our WRs. And our O-line.

  • BEAR DOWN! JustAnotherBearsFan99 say BEAR DOWN!
  • #18
    Senior Member GermansbombedPH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Bavaria, Germany
    Posts
    1,778
    Bear Bucks
    14,354
    Post Thanks / Like
    Items Bass Ale
Gift received at 11-08-2012, 03:55 AM from soulman
Message: Enjoy the beer brother.  It's not St. Pauli Girl but Irish Beers are pretty good too, LOL.Beer Me!
Gift received at 01-25-2012, 10:27 PM from soulman
Message: Here's what the Bears Bucks are for.  Have a beer on me.6Beer Me!
    no Tebow option?

  • #19
    Mexipuss
    BearStuff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Behind the scenes
    Posts
    28,154
    Bear Bucks
    56,428
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    13
    Items Bears Head LogoBears Head LogoBears C2200
Gift received at 10-18-2011, 08:48 PM from 4th and 26
Message: I bought you the gheyest gift I could find on this site.  lol
    #5 - let Campbell and McCown go, keep Blanchard, pick up an experienced backup ala Matt Moore (though he isn't the only option).


    Winston Churchill:
    "Since light travels faster than sound, some people appear bright until you hear them speak."

    "If you're not a liberal at twenty you have no heart, if you're not a conservative at forty you have no brain."

  • BEAR DOWN! darkarius, Riczaj01, XaosGorilla say BEAR DOWN!
  • #20
    Senior Member Riczaj01's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    San Antonio Tx, Originally Fort Wayne, IN.
    Posts
    14,584
    Bear Bucks
    46,011
    Post Thanks / Like
    Items Pitcher O Beer!
Gift received at 09-21-2012, 11:42 PM from soulman
Message: Here's a whole pitcher of it but you'll have to drink most of it.  I'm a light hitter.  HahaDaBearz MascotDaBears MascotBears CBears Head Logo
    Bearstuff, agreed. I'm stunned w/how many people would be okay w/McCown back. He's worse then Campbell, cost should be no option for the backup qb, in cap or draft pick. It's the most imporant position on the field and if Cutler goes down it should not cost the Bears their season.

    That being said, vet backsups cost to much for their actual value(next to none) since they all have proven to be not good enough anyways. Only real option is to move Blanchard up(if camp has shown he has talent then move him up and develop him), or get a guy like Moore who might not cost that much in hopes that Blanchard can outplay him if necessary...or draft a guy in the 4th-5th round.

  • BEAR DOWN! Henry Burris say BEAR DOWN!
  • Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •