Final 2012 Offensive Line Stats

Printable View

I thought these were interesting. We did finish better than past seasons.

Quote:

LINK to the article

Regular season totals, playoffs not included

Revised as of 12/31/2012

Teams are ranked according to Adjusted Line Yards. Based on regression analysis, the Adjusted Line Yards formula takes all running back carries and assigns responsibility to the offensive line based on the following percentages:

Losses: 120% value
0-4 Yards: 100% value
5-10 Yards: 50% value
11+ Yards: 0% value

These numbers are then adjusted based on down, distance, situation, opponent, and the difference in rushing average between shotgun compared to standard formations. Finally, we normalize the numbers so that the league average for Adjusted Line Yards per carry is the same as the league average for RB yards per carry. These stats are explained furtherhere.
The following stats are not adjusted for opponent:

RB Yards: Yards per carry by that team's running backs, according to standard NFL numbers.
Power Success: Percentage of runs on third or fourth down, two yards or less to go, that achieved a first down or touchdown. Also includes runs on first-and-goal or second-and-goal from the two-yard line or closer. This is the only statistic on this page that includes quarterbacks.
Stuffed: Percentage of runs where the running back is tackled at or behind the line of scrimmage. Since being stuffed is bad, teams are ranked from stuffed least often (#1) to most often (#32).
Second Level Yards: Yards which this team's running backs earn between 5-10 yards past the line of scrimmage, divided by total running back carries.
Open Field Yards: Yards which this team's running backs earn more than 10 yards past the line of scrimmage, divided by total running back carries.

NFL averages for each stat given in red.
Why are these rankings different from the team offense DVOA ratings for rushing? Among other reasons, they don't include quarterbacks or fumbles, long runs are truncated, and a different set of adjustments is used, attempting to isolate line play rather than total team offense.
A team with a high ranking in Adjusted Line Yards but a low ranking in Open Field Yards is heavily dependent on its offensive line to make the running game work. A team with a low ranking in Adjusted Line Yards but a high ranking in Open Field Yards is heavily dependent on its running back breaking long runs to make the running game work.
However, it is important to understand that these ratings only somewhat separate the offensive line from the running backs. A team with a very good running back will appear higher no matter how bad their line, and a team with a great line with appear lower if the running back is terrible.
Stats in blue represent pass blocking. Teams are ranked according to Adjusted Sack Rate, which gives sacks (plus intentional grounding penalties) per pass attempt adjusted for down, distance, and opponent. Pass blocking stats are explained further here. Our sack totals may differ slightly from official NFL totals depending on the league's retroactive statistical adjustments.

RUN BLOCKING PASS PROTECTION

Team Adj. Line
Yards RB
Yards Power
Success Power
Rank Stuffed Stuffed
Rank 2nd Level
Yards 2nd Level
Rank Open Field
Yards Open Field
Rank Team Rank Sacks Adjusted
Sack Rate

1 SF 4.49 4.74 66% 12 17% 7 1.49 1 0.79 14 DET 1 29 3.7%

2 NYG 4.47 4.75 67% 8 19% 18 1.38 7 0.96 7 DEN 2 21 4.2%

3 SEA 4.43 4.83 70% 4 15% 1 1.42 2 0.94 8 NYG 3 20 4.4%

4 NE 4.43 4.32 66% 13 18% 10 1.33 9 0.63 22 OAK 4 27 4.4%

5 NYJ 4.38 4.00 67% 10 16% 2 1.06 24 0.45 29 NE 5 27 4.5%

6 BAL 4.34 4.53 64% 14 16% 4 1.22 14 0.87 11 TB 6 26 4.8%

7 WAS 4.25 4.72 58% 24 16% 3 1.40 5 0.85 13 NO 7 26 4.9%

8 BUF 4.24 5.15 57% 26 17% 8 1.42 3 1.14 4 ATL 8 28 5.1%

9 HOU 4.17 4.34 61% 18 20% 23 1.26 10 0.85 12 HOU 9 28 5.3%

10 MIN 4.17 5.67 53% 30 24% 29 1.41 4 2.08 1 BUF 10 30 5.5%

11 CIN 4.16 4.17 69% 5 17% 9 0.91 31 0.90 10 DAL 11 36 5.8%

12 DEN 4.13 4.07 67% 9 20% 20 1.19 16 0.53 25 CLE 12 36 6.0%

13 TB 4.12 4.50 60% 22 20% 22 1.19 15 1.09 5 STL 13 34 6.1%

14 STL 4.07 4.30 63% 16 20% 21 1.26 11 0.76 16 BAL 14 38 6.1%

15 DET 4.06 4.01 56% 27 17% 5 1.10 20 0.49 27 PIT 15 37 6.3%

16 CHI 4.05 4.08 57% 25 21% 24 1.12 19 0.73 18 MIN 16 32 6.5%

RUN BLOCKING PASS PROTECTION

Team Adj. Line
Yards RB
Yards Power
Success Power
Rank Stuffed Stuffed
Rank 2nd Level
Yards 2nd Level
Rank Open Field
Yards Open Field
Rank Team Rank Sacks Adjusted
Sack Rate

17 NO 4.05 4.40 71% 3 19% 14 1.25 12 0.90 9 MIA 17 37 6.8%

18 JAC 4.04 3.89 61% 20 19% 15 1.01 28 0.58 23 IND 18 41 6.8%

19 KC 4.03 4.84 59% 23 20% 19 1.33 8 1.25 2 TEN 19 39 7.1%

20 CLE 4.02 3.79 53% 29 19% 16 1.08 23 0.40 31 SEA 20 33 7.2%

21 MIA 3.93 4.15 63% 17 18% 11 1.14 17 0.76 17 CAR 21 36 7.6%

22 DAL 3.92 3.78 63% 15 19% 12 1.04 25 0.52 26 JAC 22 50 7.8%

23 SD 3.90 3.71 60% 21 17% 6 1.01 27 0.41 30 WAS 23 33 7.8%

24 ATL 3.87 3.69 39% 32 23% 27 1.03 26 0.66 21 CHI 24 44 8.1%

25 GB 3.85 3.58 68% 7 19% 13 0.97 29 0.28 32 PHI 25 48 8.1%

26 IND 3.74 3.78 72% 2 25% 30 1.23 13 0.48 28 ARI 26 58 8.1%

27 PIT 3.72 3.71 61% 19 19% 17 0.95 30 0.54 24 KC 27 40 8.2%

28 PHI 3.59 4.47 69% 6 26% 31 1.39 6 1.06 6 CIN 28 46 8.3%

29 OAK 3.50 3.89 55% 28 21% 25 1.09 21 0.77 15 SF 29 41 8.5%

30 CAR 3.49 3.88 75% 1 23% 26 1.08 22 0.72 19 NYJ 30 47 8.6%

31 TEN 3.35 4.21 67% 11 24% 28 1.13 18 1.19 3 GB 31 51 8.6%

32 ARI 2.92 3.26 48% 31 27% 32 0.85 32 0.66 20 SD 32 49 8.9%

x NFL x 4.25 63% x 20% x 1.07 x 0.72 x NFL x 37 6.5%

The second table lists each team's Adjusted Line Yards in each direction listed in official NFL play-by-play, along with rank among the 32 teams. Only five directions are listed because research so far shows no statistically significant difference between how well a team performs on runs listed middle, left guard, and right guard.

LEFT END LEFT TACKLE MID/GUARD RIGHT TACKLE RIGHT END

TEAM ALY Rank ALY Rank ALY Rank ALY Rank ALY Rank

1 SF 5.08 1 3.93 20 4.64 2 4.19 9 3.80 20

2 NYG 4.56 4 4.10 14 4.77 1 3.80 20 4.44 12

3 SEA 4.44 8 4.99 4 3.91 21 4.87 1 4.09 16

4 NE 4.29 11 4.69 7 4.60 3 4.56 6 3.04 29

5 NYJ 4.24 14 3.98 17 4.26 9 4.83 3 5.95 2

6 BAL 3.70 18 4.11 13 4.48 5 4.04 13 5.13 5

7 WAS 4.41 9 3.96 19 4.32 8 3.36 28 4.81 10

8 BUF 3.01 29 4.08 15 4.38 6 3.77 21 6.39 1

9 HOU 4.71 3 3.13 28 4.10 13 4.83 2 4.36 14

10 MIN 4.23 15 4.65 8 3.97 19 4.64 5 4.39 13

11 CIN 2.52 31 3.56 24 4.60 4 4.13 12 3.84 19

12 DEN 3.35 24 3.98 18 4.23 10 3.76 22 5.02 7

13 TB 4.35 10 5.26 2 3.90 22 3.88 18 2.24 31

14 STL 3.29 26 5.05 3 4.23 11 3.29 30 4.54 11

15 DET 3.01 30 3.87 21 4.36 7 3.58 25 5.06 6

16 CHI 3.59 20 4.17 12 3.90 23 3.66 24 5.42 4

LEFT END LEFT TACKLE MID/GUARD RIGHT TACKLE RIGHT END

TEAM ALY Rank ALY Rank ALY Rank ALY Rank ALY Rank

17 NO 4.74 2 3.56 25 4.07 15 3.98 15 3.43 27

18 JAC 4.25 13 5.33 1 3.88 24 4.44 7 3.75 22

19 KC 4.28 12 2.64 31 4.09 14 3.92 16 5.02 8

20 CLE 3.65 19 3.73 23 4.06 16 4.17 11 5.94 3

21 MIA 4.45 7 4.20 11 3.94 20 3.30 29 3.92 17

22 DAL 4.46 6 4.59 9 4.02 17 3.25 32 3.28 28

23 SD 3.97 17 3.43 27 3.98 18 4.81 4 2.60 30

24 ATL 3.19 27 4.86 5 3.72 25 4.32 8 3.76 21

25 GB 3.58 21 2.71 30 4.20 12 3.52 26 4.36 15

26 IND 4.05 16 4.05 16 3.53 30 3.98 14 3.44 26

27 PIT 4.55 5 4.83 6 3.44 31 4.17 10 4.91 9

28 PHI 3.37 23 3.45 26 3.61 27 3.90 17 3.69 23

29 OAK 2.16 32 4.39 10 3.57 28 3.82 19 3.68 24

30 CAR 3.55 22 2.91 29 3.57 29 3.67 23 3.60 25

31 TEN 3.12 28 3.84 22 3.61 26 3.48 27 0.42 32

32 ARI 3.35 25 2.59 32 2.68 32 3.28 31 3.88 18

x NFL 3.94 x 4.00 x 4.05 x 3.99 x 4.12 x

The third table lists how often each team runs in each direction. Numbers may not add up to 100% due to carries listed without direction.

Team RB
Carries LEFT
END LEFT
TACKLE MID/
GUARD RIGHT
TACKLE RIGHT
END

1 NE 485 10% 13% 57% 10% 9%

2 HOU 480 16% 18% 40% 15% 11%

3 DEN 448 6% 14% 59% 15% 7%

4 KC 440 17% 10% 48% 17% 9%

5 SEA 430 9% 24% 41% 21% 4%

6 NYJ 424 7% 9% 64% 15% 5%

7 CHI 418 11% 12% 49% 16% 13%

8 MIN 401 9% 8% 62% 12% 8%

9 BAL 391 11% 12% 53% 16% 8%

10 BUF 391 5% 12% 67% 12% 4%

11 SF 389 17% 16% 49% 10% 7%

12 NYG 385 14% 17% 47% 12% 9%

13 MIA 384 10% 16% 51% 16% 7%

14 SD 377 11% 14% 52% 14% 8%

15 WAS 375 21% 14% 34% 13% 18%

16 TB 372 11% 18% 57% 9% 5%

Team RB
Carries LEFT
END LEFT
TACKLE MID/
GUARD RIGHT
TACKLE RIGHT
END

17 PIT 370 3% 8% 75% 11% 4%

18 IND 365 21% 14% 53% 7% 5%

19 STL 365 9% 15% 45% 24% 7%

20 GB 363 15% 14% 42% 12% 18%

21 CIN 359 8% 13% 55% 13% 11%

22 CLE 354 6% 18% 58% 13% 4%

23 NO 350 13% 10% 61% 9% 7%

24 OAK 340 17% 18% 36% 17% 12%

25 DET 336 8% 21% 46% 18% 7%

26 ATL 334 15% 11% 43% 16% 16%

27 PHI 333 23% 14% 27% 13% 23%

28 CAR 325 16% 13% 58% 5% 8%

29 TEN 322 10% 10% 60% 13% 7%

30 DAL 321 13% 13% 48% 15% 11%

31 ARI 318 8% 23% 44% 15% 10%

32 JAC 317 13% 6% 65% 6% 10%

x NFL x 12% 14% 52% 14% 9%

01-22-2013, 10:19 PM
JustAnotherBearsFan99

If you follow that link to the league oline stats, you can look at a three year trend. We actually improved in run blocking over the past 3 seasons.

I also noticed that the two Super Bowl teams finished #1 and #6 in run blocking for the season. But SF is actually lower than us on pass blocking. Also, virtually all of the playoff teams had high ranking run blocking stats.
01-22-2013, 10:24 PM
JustAnotherBearsFan99

If I'm reading that 2nd chart correctly, it looks like our running behind LT, our blocking ranked 12th in the NFL. There were times when I thought the Webb/Rachel combo was very effective run blocking.
01-22-2013, 10:37 PM
jackiejokeman

Quote:

Originally Posted by JustAnotherBearsFan99

If I'm reading that 2nd chart correctly, it looks like our running behind LT, our blocking ranked 12th in the NFL. There were times when I thought the Webb/Rachel combo was very effective run blocking.

Heres glad to be not looking at these stats in the future if Trestmann has any brains.

Think of it as a 9 year nightmare that is over if Trestmann and Emery are who we think they are. (SEE : Dennis Green)

That never again will a BEARS management look at the OFFENSIVE LINE as an afterthought that got the FORTY NINERS to a SUPERBOWL.
01-24-2013, 12:40 PM
RochBear

Thank indeed for posting this. With Forte starting the year slowly (I thought) and Bush going on IR after a lot of good contributions, I had forgotten, until reminded by this, of the good running in the middle of the year. With Forte used as almost a scat back and Bush pounding, our OL was adequate in run blocking ... or almost adequate anyway. The numbers for measuring run quality seem good to me, all the corrections being simple and legit (imo).

Pass blocking stats are, I think, much harder to use. Sacks will depend upon both WRs and QBs almost as much as on the OL (If WRs get open early or if QBs are quick to release the ball or if QBs have great escape ability, sack totals fall of course). Since "OL" (for pass blocking) in the Bears case probably included more help from the TEs and RBs than most teams (I'm guessing) the numbers cannot be easily interpreted.
01-24-2013, 12:54 PM
Chicagoan

Quote:

Originally Posted by RochBear

Thank indeed for posting this. With Forte starting the year slowly (I thought) and Bush going on IR after a lot of good contributions, I had forgotten, until reminded by this, of the good running in the middle of the year. With Forte used as almost a scat back and Bush pounding, our OL was adequate in run blocking ... or almost adequate anyway. The numbers for measuring run quality seem good to me, all the corrections being simple and legit (imo).

Pass blocking stats are, I think, much harder to use. Sacks will depend upon both WRs and QBs almost as much as on the OL (If WRs get open early or if QBs are quick to release the ball or if QBs have great escape ability, sack totals fall of course). Since "OL" (for pass blocking) in the Bears case probably included more help from the TEs and RBs than most teams (I'm guessing) the numbers cannot be easily interpreted.

That would be my question too. I read an article a few weeks back that talked about our OL ranking, but I had no idea if blocking TE's and RB's affected those results. Another article I read gave percentages of max protect we used and they were pretty high.

Need to see if I can find those. Edit to follow and maybe someone can clarify for me.
01-24-2013, 02:30 PM
JustAnotherBearsFan99

It seemed to me, that we were often able to run block well on either end. But between the tackles we just got manhandled. And in short yardage run situations, there was never any surge. The opposing defenses just owned our interior linemen. You'd just see the entire line driven back (between the tackles).

There were times this year where the LT and LG looked really solid run blocking, even at the 2nd level and beyond. It looked pretty cool to watch.

Obviously, the pass blocking was really bad, as far as the oline players (not counting the max protect guys).
01-24-2013, 07:44 PM
jackiejokeman

Quote:

Originally Posted by JustAnotherBearsFan99

It seemed to me, that we were often able to run block well on either end. But between the tackles we just got manhandled. And in short yardage run situations, there was never any surge. The opposing defenses just owned our interior linemen. You'd just see the entire line driven back (between the tackles).

There were times this year where the LT and LG looked really solid run blocking, even at the 2nd level and beyond. It looked pretty cool to watch.

Obviously, the pass blocking was really bad, as far as the oline players (not counting the max protect guys).

Lets cut to the chase ... our OFFENSIVE LINE SUCKED !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Lets remember why we went 7-1 ... DEFENSE !
01-25-2013, 12:19 PM
RochBear

Quote:

Originally Posted by JustAnotherBearsFan99

It seemed to me, that we were often able to run block well on either end. But between the tackles we just got manhandled. And in short yardage run situations, there was never any surge. The opposing defenses just owned our interior linemen. You'd just see the entire line driven back (between the tackles).

There were times this year where the LT and LG looked really solid run blocking, even at the 2nd level and beyond. It looked pretty cool to watch.

Obviously, the pass blocking was really bad, as far as the oline players (not counting the max protect guys).

Perhaps the interior running failure was as much RB as OL. I thought the interior running with Bush was okay. Not with Forte, "of course" but he just isn't a power runner (vertical running, I suppose).

RUN BLOCKING												PASS PROTECTION
	Team	Adj. Line Yards	RB Yards	Power Success	Power Rank	Stuffed	Stuffed Rank	2nd Level Yards	2nd Level Rank	Open Field Yards	Open Field Rank	Team	Rank	Sacks	Adjusted Sack Rate
1	SF	4.49	4.74	66%	12	17%	7	1.49	1	0.79	14	DET	1	29	3.7%
2	NYG	4.47	4.75	67%	8	19%	18	1.38	7	0.96	7	DEN	2	21	4.2%
3	SEA	4.43	4.83	70%	4	15%	1	1.42	2	0.94	8	NYG	3	20	4.4%
4	NE	4.43	4.32	66%	13	18%	10	1.33	9	0.63	22	OAK	4	27	4.4%
5	NYJ	4.38	4.00	67%	10	16%	2	1.06	24	0.45	29	NE	5	27	4.5%
6	BAL	4.34	4.53	64%	14	16%	4	1.22	14	0.87	11	TB	6	26	4.8%
7	WAS	4.25	4.72	58%	24	16%	3	1.40	5	0.85	13	NO	7	26	4.9%
8	BUF	4.24	5.15	57%	26	17%	8	1.42	3	1.14	4	ATL	8	28	5.1%
9	HOU	4.17	4.34	61%	18	20%	23	1.26	10	0.85	12	HOU	9	28	5.3%
10	MIN	4.17	5.67	53%	30	24%	29	1.41	4	2.08	1	BUF	10	30	5.5%
11	CIN	4.16	4.17	69%	5	17%	9	0.91	31	0.90	10	DAL	11	36	5.8%
12	DEN	4.13	4.07	67%	9	20%	20	1.19	16	0.53	25	CLE	12	36	6.0%
13	TB	4.12	4.50	60%	22	20%	22	1.19	15	1.09	5	STL	13	34	6.1%
14	STL	4.07	4.30	63%	16	20%	21	1.26	11	0.76	16	BAL	14	38	6.1%
15	DET	4.06	4.01	56%	27	17%	5	1.10	20	0.49	27	PIT	15	37	6.3%
16	CHI	4.05	4.08	57%	25	21%	24	1.12	19	0.73	18	MIN	16	32	6.5%
RUN BLOCKING												PASS PROTECTION
	Team	Adj. Line Yards	RB Yards	Power Success	Power Rank	Stuffed	Stuffed Rank	2nd Level Yards	2nd Level Rank	Open Field Yards	Open Field Rank	Team	Rank	Sacks	Adjusted Sack Rate
17	NO	4.05	4.40	71%	3	19%	14	1.25	12	0.90	9	MIA	17	37	6.8%
18	JAC	4.04	3.89	61%	20	19%	15	1.01	28	0.58	23	IND	18	41	6.8%
19	KC	4.03	4.84	59%	23	20%	19	1.33	8	1.25	2	TEN	19	39	7.1%
20	CLE	4.02	3.79	53%	29	19%	16	1.08	23	0.40	31	SEA	20	33	7.2%
21	MIA	3.93	4.15	63%	17	18%	11	1.14	17	0.76	17	CAR	21	36	7.6%
22	DAL	3.92	3.78	63%	15	19%	12	1.04	25	0.52	26	JAC	22	50	7.8%
23	SD	3.90	3.71	60%	21	17%	6	1.01	27	0.41	30	WAS	23	33	7.8%
24	ATL	3.87	3.69	39%	32	23%	27	1.03	26	0.66	21	CHI	24	44	8.1%
25	GB	3.85	3.58	68%	7	19%	13	0.97	29	0.28	32	PHI	25	48	8.1%
26	IND	3.74	3.78	72%	2	25%	30	1.23	13	0.48	28	ARI	26	58	8.1%
27	PIT	3.72	3.71	61%	19	19%	17	0.95	30	0.54	24	KC	27	40	8.2%
28	PHI	3.59	4.47	69%	6	26%	31	1.39	6	1.06	6	CIN	28	46	8.3%
29	OAK	3.50	3.89	55%	28	21%	25	1.09	21	0.77	15	SF	29	41	8.5%
30	CAR	3.49	3.88	75%	1	23%	26	1.08	22	0.72	19	NYJ	30	47	8.6%
31	TEN	3.35	4.21	67%	11	24%	28	1.13	18	1.19	3	GB	31	51	8.6%
32	ARI	2.92	3.26	48%	31	27%	32	0.85	32	0.66	20	SD	32	49	8.9%
x	NFL	x	4.25	63%	x	20%	x	1.07	x	0.72	x	NFL	x	37	6.5%

		LEFT END		LEFT TACKLE		MID/GUARD		RIGHT TACKLE		RIGHT END
	TEAM	ALY	Rank	ALY	Rank	ALY	Rank	ALY	Rank	ALY	Rank
1	SF	5.08	1	3.93	20	4.64	2	4.19	9	3.80	20
2	NYG	4.56	4	4.10	14	4.77	1	3.80	20	4.44	12
3	SEA	4.44	8	4.99	4	3.91	21	4.87	1	4.09	16
4	NE	4.29	11	4.69	7	4.60	3	4.56	6	3.04	29
5	NYJ	4.24	14	3.98	17	4.26	9	4.83	3	5.95	2
6	BAL	3.70	18	4.11	13	4.48	5	4.04	13	5.13	5
7	WAS	4.41	9	3.96	19	4.32	8	3.36	28	4.81	10
8	BUF	3.01	29	4.08	15	4.38	6	3.77	21	6.39	1
9	HOU	4.71	3	3.13	28	4.10	13	4.83	2	4.36	14
10	MIN	4.23	15	4.65	8	3.97	19	4.64	5	4.39	13
11	CIN	2.52	31	3.56	24	4.60	4	4.13	12	3.84	19
12	DEN	3.35	24	3.98	18	4.23	10	3.76	22	5.02	7
13	TB	4.35	10	5.26	2	3.90	22	3.88	18	2.24	31
14	STL	3.29	26	5.05	3	4.23	11	3.29	30	4.54	11
15	DET	3.01	30	3.87	21	4.36	7	3.58	25	5.06	6
16	CHI	3.59	20	4.17	12	3.90	23	3.66	24	5.42	4
		LEFT END		LEFT TACKLE		MID/GUARD		RIGHT TACKLE		RIGHT END
	TEAM	ALY	Rank	ALY	Rank	ALY	Rank	ALY	Rank	ALY	Rank
17	NO	4.74	2	3.56	25	4.07	15	3.98	15	3.43	27
18	JAC	4.25	13	5.33	1	3.88	24	4.44	7	3.75	22
19	KC	4.28	12	2.64	31	4.09	14	3.92	16	5.02	8
20	CLE	3.65	19	3.73	23	4.06	16	4.17	11	5.94	3
21	MIA	4.45	7	4.20	11	3.94	20	3.30	29	3.92	17
22	DAL	4.46	6	4.59	9	4.02	17	3.25	32	3.28	28
23	SD	3.97	17	3.43	27	3.98	18	4.81	4	2.60	30
24	ATL	3.19	27	4.86	5	3.72	25	4.32	8	3.76	21
25	GB	3.58	21	2.71	30	4.20	12	3.52	26	4.36	15
26	IND	4.05	16	4.05	16	3.53	30	3.98	14	3.44	26
27	PIT	4.55	5	4.83	6	3.44	31	4.17	10	4.91	9
28	PHI	3.37	23	3.45	26	3.61	27	3.90	17	3.69	23
29	OAK	2.16	32	4.39	10	3.57	28	3.82	19	3.68	24
30	CAR	3.55	22	2.91	29	3.57	29	3.67	23	3.60	25
31	TEN	3.12	28	3.84	22	3.61	26	3.48	27	0.42	32
32	ARI	3.35	25	2.59	32	2.68	32	3.28	31	3.88	18
x	NFL	3.94	x	4.00	x	4.05	x	3.99	x	4.12	x

	Team	RB Carries	LEFT END	LEFT TACKLE	MID/ GUARD	RIGHT TACKLE	RIGHT END
1	NE	485	10%	13%	57%	10%	9%
2	HOU	480	16%	18%	40%	15%	11%
3	DEN	448	6%	14%	59%	15%	7%
4	KC	440	17%	10%	48%	17%	9%
5	SEA	430	9%	24%	41%	21%	4%
6	NYJ	424	7%	9%	64%	15%	5%
7	CHI	418	11%	12%	49%	16%	13%
8	MIN	401	9%	8%	62%	12%	8%
9	BAL	391	11%	12%	53%	16%	8%
10	BUF	391	5%	12%	67%	12%	4%
11	SF	389	17%	16%	49%	10%	7%
12	NYG	385	14%	17%	47%	12%	9%
13	MIA	384	10%	16%	51%	16%	7%
14	SD	377	11%	14%	52%	14%	8%
15	WAS	375	21%	14%	34%	13%	18%
16	TB	372	11%	18%	57%	9%	5%
	Team	RB Carries	LEFT END	LEFT TACKLE	MID/ GUARD	RIGHT TACKLE	RIGHT END
17	PIT	370	3%	8%	75%	11%	4%
18	IND	365	21%	14%	53%	7%	5%
19	STL	365	9%	15%	45%	24%	7%
20	GB	363	15%	14%	42%	12%	18%
21	CIN	359	8%	13%	55%	13%	11%
22	CLE	354	6%	18%	58%	13%	4%
23	NO	350	13%	10%	61%	9%	7%
24	OAK	340	17%	18%	36%	17%	12%
25	DET	336	8%	21%	46%	18%	7%
26	ATL	334	15%	11%	43%	16%	16%
27	PHI	333	23%	14%	27%	13%	23%
28	CAR	325	16%	13%	58%	5%	8%
29	TEN	322	10%	10%	60%	13%	7%
30	DAL	321	13%	13%	48%	15%	11%
31	ARI	318	8%	23%	44%	15%	10%
32	JAC	317	13%	6%	65%	6%	10%
x	NFL	x	12%	14%	52%	14%	9%