-
Wootton High on Bears Most Improved List............
Playing time indicative of great strides Wootton made
Bears defensive end supplanted starter Idonije and with McClellin provided some relief for Peppers
Corey Wootton sacks Packers quarterback Aaron Rodgers in the first quarter at Soldier Field. (Chris Sweda/Tribune Photo / January 30, 2013) |
By Brad Biggs, Chicago Tribune reporter 6:14 p.m. CST, January 30, 2013
The emergence of Corey Wootton in his third season and addition of Shea McClellin as the Bears' first-round draft pick allowed the team finally to lighten the workload for Julius Peppers.
The Pro Bowl defensive end participated in 74.5 percent of the team's plays, according to NFL statistics provided to the Tribune, his lowest figure in three seasons with the club. Keeping Peppers fresh — he played 82.1 percent of the snaps in 2011 and 87.9 in 2010 — helped him remain effective throughout the season. The difference from 2010 to 2012 is 129 defensive snaps — roughly eight per game.
Peppers turned 33 earlier this month. His 111/2 sacks were his most for the Bears and his highest production since a career-best 141/2 in 2008. He tied a career-high with three sacks in the Week 16 victory at Arizona and had 11/2 in a Week 15 loss to the Packers. Peppers had three sacks in the final four games of 2011 but only one in the final four regular-season games in 2010 and the Bears tried to use their linemen in waves under former coach Lovie Smith.
The presence of McClellin as a third end filled a long-term void. McClellin played in 34.7 percent of the snaps, recording 21/2 sacks. But the Bears got tremendous production from Wootton, who placed third on the team with seven sacks playing only 54.5 percent of the snaps. The Bears finished with 41 sacks, eighth in the NFL and tying for the most in nine seasons under Smith. (This was a career saving year for him)
Wootton took over the starting job at left end for the final five games from Israel Idonije, who played in 67.7 percent of plays, his lowest figure since 2009. Idonije produced 71/2 sacks, the most since his career-high eight in 2010. The 32-year-old is scheduled to become an unrestricted free agent and has expressed a desire to return. He was versatile at the end of the season, moving back inside to play some tackle. (I think this is even more evidence of why we should have Izzy back. He also had a FF and 29 solo tackles. His last three years have been the best of his career and he's still at the top of his game and another high character guy)
A strong case could be made that Wootton was the team's most improved player. Cornerback Tim Jennings led the NFL with nine interceptions and made a surprise trip to the Pro Bowl. But the Bears signed Jennings to be a starter with a $6.6 million, two-year contract. Injuries and inconsistency plagued Wootton's first two seasons.
"The first two years were disappointing for me to be honest," Wootton said. "I knew this year I really had to show out.
"A lot of people had me slated to not even make the team. So, I knew this is what I had to work toward. I think I have gotten better every week. I am excited for the future here." (I like guys who'll tell you they want to stick around and be a part to this team)
Here are some other numbers that stick out from the Bears' playing time statistics:
•Center Roberto Garza and left tackle J'Marcus Webb were the only two players on the roster to participate in 100 percent of their possible snaps — 1,046 on offense.
•Wide receiver Devin Hester's playing time dipped to 34.5 percent, just 361 snaps. Hester was at 45.7 in 2011 and as high as 66.0 in 2010.
•Wide receiver Brandon Marshall sat out for only 77 snaps, tops among skill position players and just ahead of tight end Kellen Davis, who missed 90 snaps. (The best and worst of it)
•The new coaching staff will have plenty of tape to evaluate rookie guard James Brown. He made three starts and was on the field for 20.6 percent of the snaps. (I'd like to see Brown come one strong this coming year. He could end up being a steal as an UDFA)
•Cornerback Zack Bowman finished with 11 special teams tackles, tied for second on the team with Blake Costanzo, despite appearing in only 11 games and 41.7 percent of special teams snaps. Eric Weems led the team with 12 tackles and participated in 67.8 percent of special teams plays. Costanzo was at 65.5. (If I'm GM it's hello Zack and goodbye Eric. I thought Weems was one of this past seasons disappointments. He was very average)
bmbiggs@tribune.com
Twitter @BradBiggs
Copyright © 2013 Chicago Tribune Company, LLC
I'm getting to that age where a lifetime warranty just doesn't mean as much to me anymore as an afternoon nap.
Honey Badger Don't Care. Honey Badger Don't Give a Shit.
-
-
Wootton is in the final year of his rookie contact making $575k so on a per sack basis he's one hell of a deal. I do believe in him we've found our starting LDE and we need to get him an extension this coming year or shortly thereafter. He's in the next wave of keepers.
I'm getting to that age where a lifetime warranty just doesn't mean as much to me anymore as an afternoon nap.
Honey Badger Don't Care. Honey Badger Don't Give a Shit.
-

Originally Posted by
soulman
Wootton is in the final year of his rookie contact making $575k so on a per sack basis he's one hell of a deal. I do believe in him we've found our starting LDE and we need to get him an extension this coming year or shortly thereafter. He's in the next wave of keepers.
Soul, I agree with you that Wooton has earned the starting LDE spot, and should begin camp there. But, what does this say about McClellin? I'm a fan of the kid, but a first rounder should be pushing hard to start if not end of year 1, at least going into camp year 2. To stay on topic with the thread, I believe Wooton could eventually move to the RDE if/when Pep retires, as long as keeps developing. I don't believe he has reached his peak, and he's got a great future as long as he stays healthy. Pressure is on Shea to make a case, and I hope he's already well in his off-season program to get some much needed strength.
-

Originally Posted by
Rakk
Soul, I agree with you that Wooton has earned the starting LDE spot, and should begin camp there. But, what does this say about McClellin? I'm a fan of the kid, but a first rounder should be pushing hard to start if not end of year 1, at least going into camp year 2. To stay on topic with the thread, I believe Wooton could eventually move to the RDE if/when Pep retires, as long as keeps developing. I don't believe he has reached his peak, and he's got a great future as long as he stays healthy. Pressure is on Shea to make a case, and I hope he's already well in his off-season program to get some much needed strength.
Rakk I think Lovie did Shea a disservice my insisting that he would nothing more than a "hand in the dirt" LDE. As it turns out they didn't use him that way most of the time anyway. And remember before the injury his senior year Wootton carried a potential first round draft grade so he's now playing as we might have expected him to once he was healthy. It's not exactly like a mid round pick beating out a first rounder. Wootton has always shown more potential than that. Until this year he just couldn't stay healthy.
Shea was never the perfect every down LDE whereas Wootton and Izzy are. He doesn't have the ideal size for it. He's really more of a RDE type guy and he may eventually replace Pep there. He's actually of far more use right now if we move him around and let him be a playmaker in a Clay Matthews kind of way. That's something we didn't before we drafted him.
He made some nice plays behind the line of scrimmage and had 2.5 sacks playing just 35% of the snaps bump that up to 75% of the snaps like Pep played and you might have expected 5 or 6 sacks which isn't all that bad for a rookie. He had a ton of hurries and knockdowns too where he was just a half step away from the sack. He'll eventually learn to convert on those just like the more experienced guys have.
It's far less that he didn't meet expectations than the fact that we didn't need him to start at LDE. Not when we got 14 1/2 sacks out of Izzy and Wooton combined. It was more them having superb years than Shea having a bad one. Let's see what Tucker does with him. I have a feeling we'll be a bit more aggressive on defense now and I think Shea will become a big part of that. I'm not gonna pass judgement on him or that pick until after his third year. Then we'll know what kind of player he really is.
I'm getting to that age where a lifetime warranty just doesn't mean as much to me anymore as an afternoon nap.
Honey Badger Don't Care. Honey Badger Don't Give a Shit.
-
High Fives / Like - 2 BEAR DOWN!, 0 Dislikes
-

Originally Posted by
soulman
Rakk I think Lovie did Shea a disservice my insisting that he would nothing more than a "hand in the dirt" LDE. As it turns out they didn't use him that way most of the time anyway. And remember before the injury his senior year Wootton carried a potential first round draft grade so he's now playing as we might have expected him to once he was healthy. It's not exactly like a mid round pick beating out a first rounder. Wootton has always shown more potential than that. Until this year he just couldn't stay healthy.
Shea was never the perfect every down LDE whereas Wootton and Izzy are. He doesn't have the ideal size for it. He's really more of a RDE type guy and he may eventually replace Pep there. He's actually of far more use right now if we move him around and let him be a playmaker in a Clay Matthews kind of way. That's something we didn't before we drafted him.
He made some nice plays behind the line of scrimmage and had 2.5 sacks playing just 35% of the snaps bump that up to 75% of the snaps like Pep played and you might have expected 5 or 6 sacks which isn't all that bad for a rookie. He had a ton of hurries and knockdowns too where he was just a half step away from the sack. He'll eventually learn to convert on those just like the more experienced guys have.
It's far less that he didn't meet expectations than the fact that we didn't need him to start at LDE. Not when we got 14 1/2 sacks out of Izzy and Wooton combined. It was more them having superb years than Shea having a bad one. Let's see what Tucker does with him. I have a feeling we'll be a bit more aggressive on defense now and I think Shea will become a big part of that. I'm not gonna pass judgement on him or that pick until after his third year. Then we'll know what kind of player he really is.
Good points. I would also add that one of the strengths of our dline is the OVERALL quality of the roster at these positions. It's not like we have a starter at each position who is "The Guy" and the depth players are bums. I like how the Bears can rotate high-quality players into the dline rotation throughout games. It's one heck of a strength that we have. So, I'm not one of those guys who are down on Shea not being an every down player. He's one hell of a weapon to throw at OL's. It must be a living hell for opposing OL's to prepare for the ARRAY of weapons the Chicago Bears throw at them. And in our NFC-N, it is particularly vital to put heavy-duty pressure on QB's like Rodgers and Stafford. If these guys have any time at all to throw, they'll rip your heart out.
I hope the new regime keeps this mindset. It's one of the things Lovie Smith did right.
Last edited by JustAnotherBearsFan99; 01-31-2013 at 08:43 AM.
-
Arsecicle
What about Joakim Noah? What's he high on?
I'm BACK, Jack... or something..
-

Originally Posted by
soulman
Rakk I think Lovie did Shea a disservice my insisting that he would nothing more than a "hand in the dirt" LDE. As it turns out they didn't use him that way most of the time anyway. And remember before the injury his senior year Wootton carried a potential first round draft grade so he's now playing as we might have expected him to once he was healthy. It's not exactly like a mid round pick beating out a first rounder. Wootton has always shown more potential than that. Until this year he just couldn't stay healthy.
Shea was never the perfect every down LDE whereas Wootton and Izzy are. He doesn't have the ideal size for it. He's really more of a RDE type guy and he may eventually replace Pep there. He's actually of far more use right now if we move him around and let him be a playmaker in a Clay Matthews kind of way. That's something we didn't before we drafted him.
He made some nice plays behind the line of scrimmage and had 2.5 sacks playing just 35% of the snaps bump that up to 75% of the snaps like Pep played and you might have expected 5 or 6 sacks which isn't all that bad for a rookie. He had a ton of hurries and knockdowns too where he was just a half step away from the sack. He'll eventually learn to convert on those just like the more experienced guys have.
It's far less that he didn't meet expectations than the fact that we didn't need him to start at LDE. Not when we got 14 1/2 sacks out of Izzy and Wooton combined. It was more them having superb years than Shea having a bad one. Let's see what Tucker does with him. I have a feeling we'll be a bit more aggressive on defense now and I think Shea will become a big part of that. I'm not gonna pass judgement on him or that pick until after his third year. Then we'll know what kind of player he really is.
Good observations. One thing I have read about Tucker is we will see a more aggressive defense. That will bode well for a guy like Shea. He didn't seem like a true Lovie D DE, so I have to assume Emery envisions our Defense to develop a more "attacking" style. Question then is if the back end can handle it?
-
High Fives / Like - 1 BEAR DOWN!, 0 Dislikes