Thread: Aaron rodgers- Close game choker?.. 1-11.. ouch!

Originally Posted by dabears54

no, but Rodgers thrown more INT's this year than cutler( 9 Int's to jay's 7)..so guess he has that talent also! just spreads it out more..lol : )

He has also thrown more touch downs, 12 to Jay's seven

Originally Posted by The Benjamin

He has also thrown more touch downs, 12 to Jay's seven

that is correct, but has nothing to do with throwing more INt's does it? just saying if going to pick on Jay for throwing INT's, whn your qb has actually thrown more, a glass houses thing. and wouldn't the more td's be because they can't run the ball and you always say hey have much better WR's so expect the more td's.. but not more INt's, right?

Originally Posted by dabears54

that is correct, but has nothing to do with throwing more INt's does it? just saying if going to pick on Jay for throwing INT's, whn your qb has actually thrown more, a glass houses thing. and wouldn't the more td's be because they can't run the ball and you always say hey have much better WR's so expect the more td's.. but not more INt's, right?

Bears don't really run the ball either, so shouldn't Jay have more TDs too then?

FWIW, packers have a better running game than the Bears.

They are ranked 16 on total rushing yards we are ranked 23
They are ranked 20 on yards per game we are 29
They are ranked 28 in attempts per game we are 30

As far as the INTs, give it a few weeks and Cutler will pass him.

Originally Posted by The Benjamin

Bears don't really run the ball either, so shouldn't Jay have more TDs too then?

FWIW, packers have a better running game than the Bears.

They are ranked 16 on total rushing yards we are ranked 23
They are ranked 20 on yards per game we are 29
They are ranked 28 in attempts per game we are 30

As far as the INTs, give it a few weeks and Cutler will pass him.

No because jay has no wr's to throw to right?.. : )

and i'll strongly disagree forte/taylor are not better than jackson/kuhn

that is on our OC for not running more, but we have more talent at rb by a wide margin, just like they have a wide talent advantage at WR

Originally Posted by dabears54

and i'll strongly disagree forte/taylor are not better than jackson/kuhn

Strogly disagree. Our backs are better than the packers RBs.

Fwiw, I just said they have a better running game and stats back it up.

Originally Posted by The Benjamin

Strogly disagree. Our backs are better than the packers RBs.

Fwiw, I just said they have a better running game and stats back it up.

While 8 yards a game isn't exactly a big difference tehncially you are correct, but its like saying since Knox has 478 yards the stats back up he is better than any WR on packers by a wide margin and the stats back it up. I don't feel he is better despite tehnically having more yards, nor Do I feel the packers running game w/o grant is better than bears now

Knox is having a better season

i would take GB offense over ours in a damn heart beat. Before injury Grant waaaaaaaay better then both Forte and Taylor put together. Even Packers old nasty oline is better then soft crap like Williams. Rogers is better then Cutler. And his weapons are a million times better then anything JA ever sniffed at drafting. We are in ZERO position making fun of packers. They have a better track record of building an offense then the shit JA has peddled to us.

Take GB's offense over ours? No brainer, yes.

Grant better than Forte and Taylor? No way.

Packers shitty o-line over the Bears shitty o-line? Yeah, but only for this season. They suck pretty hard too.

Rogers > Cutler? On the surface, yes... but Rodgers is nothing outside of that system. Cutler's boneheaded mistakes are what's keeping him down. He's much more physically talented than Rodgers. Cutler, under Shanahan was better than Rodgers. I hope the Bears haven't ruined him for good.

We are in zero position to poke fun at the Fugies? Yep

Packers have a better track record of building an offense than JA? Packers by a mile, and a half in an 800 meter race.