Facebook Twitter

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 14 of 14

Thread: The real victims of the work stoppageSome NFL

  1. #11
    Banned dabears54's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    19,172
    Bear Bucks
    13,967
    Post Thanks / Like
    Owner, team president send letter to all retired players Aaron Wilson


    As the labor dispute continues with no end in sight, the tug of war over the retired players continues.

    In the latest salvo, Carolina Panthers owner Jerry Richardson and Green Bay Packers president Mark Murphy addressed all retired players in a letter regarding benefits available to them in the March 11 proposal from the NFL bargaining committee to the decertified players' union

    Here's the full text of their letter:

    "Dear Retired Player:
    On March 11, the NFL Players Association – which states that it represents players “past, present and future” – walked away from the bargaining table, announced it was giving up its status as a labor organization, and sued the NFL in Minnesota. As retired players who are members of the owners’ bargaining committee, we have a unique perspective because we understand these issues from all sides. More importantly, we understand the challenges former players and their families face.

    The union walked away from mediation, cutting off negotiations on an offer that was made by the clubs to avoid a work stoppage and that would have provided important improvements in retired player benefits. We know some former players have struggled financially. This was a real attempt to address those financial concerns. We are committed to making sure that when we reach a new agreement it better addresses the needs of our retirees. It’s the fair thing to do. It’s the right thing to do and it recognizes and respects your contributions to our game.

    One of Commissioner Roger Goodell’s highest priorities has been meeting with retirees, their families, and those who advocate on behalf of retired players. Leaders including Mike Ditka of Gridiron Greats, Bruce Laird of Fourth and Goal, and George Martin of NFL Alumni have met with NFL owners face-to-face to discuss issues affecting former players and their families. We have developed a constructive relationship with these men and others who promote the interests of retired players. Our bargaining proposals reflect the concerns we have heard, and we want to help.

    George Martin was invited to speak to NFL owners at our recent league meeting in New Orleans. He again stressed the need for increased pensions and other improvements for retired players. George also reported to his board and chapter presidents that his subsequent meeting with the NFLPA-Retired Players Group in Florida did not go as well. In a letter to his board, he described the atmosphere as “defiant, accusatory, and outright disrespectful."

    It is important to us that you know the facts about what we offered the union. Among the elements of our March 11 proposal that would have improved benefits for former players are the following:

    ?A new pension supplement for retired players aged 55 or above. This supplement would give more than 2,000 retirees an immediate increase in pension payments averaging almost 60 percent.

    ?Improvements in the Disability Plans and the 88 Plan to ease the qualifications for disability benefits and increase the value of those benefits to qualifying retirees.
    ?Expanded career transition programs to assist former players in developing second careers, both in and out of football.

    ?A new rookie pay system that would re-allocate more than $300 million per draft class to fund benefits for current and retired players.

    These are significant offers that would have a measurable impact on the people who made football great.

    Sadly, the players’ union wasn’t listening.

    Nobody, least of all Commissioner Goodell and the owners, is pleased that negotiations broke down and that a work stoppage has begun. But even though current players are locked out, the clubs will fully honor their commitments to you. You didn’t cause this dispute, and you won’t have to pay for it.

    This means that despite various reports or comments to the contrary, there will be no reduction in any retiree benefit programs. We will continue to make all pension payments and contributions. If you are currently receiving post-career medical benefits, you will continue to do so. There will be no reduction in payments or coverage under the disability plans or the 88 Plan. And we will continue to accept applications from retired players for all benefit plans. We’re serious about our commitment to you and we will keep our word.

    For example, you asked for greater access to long-term health care, and so we recently instituted a new program to provide long-term care insurance for retirees. Because the union refused to participate, this insurance program is being funded entirely by NFL owners. Transamerica Life Insurance is now contacting retired players to solicit applications. Coverage may also be available to your spouse at a reduced premium.
    Further, the NFL will maintain the benefits available through the NFL Player Care Plan. The plan provides joint replacement and assisted living benefits, a discount prescription drug card, neurological and spine treatment programs, a Medicare supplement program, and vested-inactive life insurance. We did this to improve your quality of life off the field because you gave so much on the field.

    An independent organization primarily financed by the NFL owners, the Player Care Foundation (PCF) was established to improve the quality of life for former players through financial grants and research. PCF provides monetary grants to former players experiencing financial hardships, including grants to those who need assistance in paying for the costs of Player Care Plan programs such as joint replacement, spine treatment or neurological care. PCF also sponsors cardiovascular and prostate screening programs.
    For information regarding any of the above retired player benefits, programs, and services, please call the NFL Player Benefits Department at 1-800-NFL-GOAL (1-800-635-4625).

    We want you to be fully informed, and to know the facts. The NFL Players Association recently stated that NFL owners contribute nothing to the pensions of former players. (DeMaurice Smith on WFAN Radio in New York: “How much money do the NFL teams provide to the former player pensions? The answer is zero.”) In fact, in the past 10 years alone the NFL owners have contributed $2.7 billion to the funding of benefit plans for current and former players. On March 30, NFL owners paid almost $180 million to fund pension, disability, medical and other benefits for the 2010 season.

    Commissioner Goodell and the owners are prepared to resume collective bargaining immediately. The longer we wait, the more economically difficult it will be to reach an agreement. When we do resume negotiations – and we will – our top priorities for a new agreement will include the benefit improvements described in this letter. We do not know what the NFLPA may seek for current players, but we will not set aside your needs. Your voice needs to be heard, and we will listen.
    Sincerely,
    Mark Murphy Jerry Richardson
    President & CEO Owner/Founder
    Green Bay Packers Carolina Panthers
    (Washington Redskins 1977-84) (Baltimore Colts 1959-60)

  • #12
    Banned dabears54's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    19,172
    Bear Bucks
    13,967
    Post Thanks / Like
    Loss of pre-draft camp impacts new coaches, veterans. Matt BowEN

    The NFL lockout has already lasted over a month. No free agency, trades or any sort of veteran player movement are evident examples of the fallout. And no contact between player and coach, which includes the basic idea of a playbook.
    I think this is an absolute mess from a football standpoint—but it gets worse.

    New coaching staffs do have the luxury (and something I see as a necessity) of holding an extra mini camp in the offseason. That camp—which is a usually a veteran camp—is held on one of the weekends leading up to the draft.

    However, as new Vikings’ coach Leslie Frazier announced on Monday, Minnesota will cancel their scheduled camp this weekend because the NFL is currently closed for business. And we can apply the same thing to new staffs in Carolina, Denver, Cleveland, Tennessee, San Francisco, and Oakland (unless the lockout is suddenly lifted).

    In reality, these camps are an audition for veterans in front of the new coach. New playbooks, techniques, practice habits, etc. All important phases of the first pre-draft mini camp with a new boss in town.

    But the bottom line here is simple: coaches want to evaluate the vets at these camps—because they are looking to replace them.
    I’ve been through two of these pre-draft camps as a veteran during coaching changes in Washington under Joe Gibbs and in Buffalo under Dick Jauron. What is usually a glorified OTA for current players on the roster turns into a competitive atmosphere, because jobs (and future paychecks) are at stake. You know the coaching staff is going to set their draft board off of what they see with the (leftover) talent on the practice field.


    The veterans who will be working under new coaches understand this. Losing that extra weekend to learn new schemes and pre-snap alignments hurts, but not as much as the opportunity for vets to showcase their talents—even in shorts and helmets.
    Think of some of the young talent that is on stage for the new staff to evaluate. Jimmy Clausen in Carolina (a club that has been connected with both Cam Newton and Blaine Gabbert) or Tim Tebow in Denver. What that pre-draft mini-camp provides is three days of practice in front of the new head man. Now—in the current state of the NFL—that is lost.

    And it hurts both sides. Coaches are now regulated to watching tape, losing out on the chance to work with these veterans and see them up close on the practice field, in meetings and under the stress of learning a new playbook over night—something you can’t see in the film room. That isn’t good Ron Rivera, John Fox, Jim Harbaugh, etc.

    As I said above, the NFL lockout is a mess from my point of view when we apply it to actual football on the field. And right now, no one is winning. New coaching staffs included.

  • #13
    Mello Jello soulman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    PEYTON'S PLACE
    Posts
    23,002
    Bear Bucks
    40,812
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    1
    Items Captain Morgan
Gift received at 11-07-2012, 07:28 AM from GermansbombedPH
Message: Better than that soap water guniessTequilla
Gift received at 09-22-2012, 10:24 AM from Riczaj01
Message: downhere in Northern Mexico(aka San Antonio Texas), we tend to share this....not my personal favorite, but I'm definately in the minority.Trophy
Gift received at 01-30-2012, 01:48 PM from Dagan81
Message: Because you're the best God damn poster on this message board!  And, a true friend at that!9599
    No doubt this delay in beginning pre-draft camps hurts teams. Especially those with new coaching staffs. Not being able to evaluate your exisiting talent and begin offseason activities involved with installing and offense or a new defense will put those teams at a disadvantage come September.

    For the vets it may be seen as a temporary boon. Guys who are out of condition, carrying too much or too little weight, and may be on the bubble based on last years performance get a bit of a reprieve. It will be much harder for all teams to draft not knowing exactly what they need to draft for and of course also not knowing what holes might be filled in FA.

    I guess we can consider the Bears lucky in this regard. We know exactly what holes we need to fill and those the will require draftees to fill, mainly LT and 3t DT. I think we also have a pretty good idea of who we want to keep and who already has one foot out the door. A couple of those guys are already gone.

    In the long run the Bears preparedness may actually give them a boost this year. I don't see most of this hurting us as much as other teams. The biggest issue might be the offensive skill positions needing more time to learn Martz's systems.

  • #14
    Banned dabears54's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    19,172
    Bear Bucks
    13,967
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by soulman View Post
    No doubt this delay in beginning pre-draft camps hurts teams. Especially those with new coaching staffs. Not being able to evaluate your exisiting talent and begin offseason activities involved with installing and offense or a new defense will put those teams at a disadvantage come September.

    For the vets it may be seen as a temporary boon. Guys who are out of condition, carrying too much or too little weight, and may be on the bubble based on last years performance get a bit of a reprieve. It will be much harder for all teams to draft not knowing exactly what they need to draft for and of course also not knowing what holes might be filled in FA.

    I guess we can consider the Bears lucky in this regard. We know exactly what holes we need to fill and those the will require draftees to fill, mainly LT and 3t DT. I think we also have a pretty good idea of who we want to keep and who already has one foot out the door. A couple of those guys are already gone.

    In the long run the Bears preparedness may actually give them a boost this year. I don't see most of this hurting us as much as other teams. The biggest issue might be the offensive skill positions needing more time to learn Martz's systems.
    Agree it helps the teams w/o turnover on coaching staffs and important positions( ie a new qb real hurts teams now in development)
    like the bears,,, But on the vets the 'otherside" is many will lose $100,000-$1 mill+ workout bonuses if the lockout continues...

  • Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •