-

Originally Posted by
soulman
Does that mean Bill Clinton was trying to set up a menage a trois with Moncia and Hilary? Or was it with just Monica and the cigar?
You know like,"You, me and the cigar makes three". She gets to enjoy it both ways.
HAHAHAHAHA!!! That's brilliant!!!
-
-

Originally Posted by
soulman
Oh yeah, Deanna, Jenn, and Brett in a menage a trois.........right.

point being, you don't know the story, so your judgment is invalid.
-

Originally Posted by
soulman
Does that mean Bill Clinton was trying to set up a menage a trois with Moncia and Hilary? Or was it with just Monica and the cigar?
You know like,"You, me and the cigar makes three". She gets to enjoy it both ways.
Bill Clinton was Lucky Pierre in this case. In our observation of Favre and his two maids in waiting, I'd say he's Lucky Pierre.
-

Originally Posted by
Henry Burris
point being, you don't know the story, so your judgment is invalid.
First of all Henry my "judgement" is simply an opinion based on the facts presented and the use of those facts coupled with logic to form an opinion. An opinion can never be invalid but it may, through introduction of either new facts or the use of false logic, be proven wrong. Until then it is simply a personal opinion just like your opinion of Chad Pennington. It may be proven wrong but it isn't invalid.
Second is the fact that with whatever evidence the league was able to review they fined Favre $100k for his lack of cooperation with the investigation in that he made false or misleading statements and in doing so obstructed the investigation. Hard to believe they would fine their NFL icon $100k if he did nothing wrong and if he did nothing wrong why was he not able to show evidence proving it? Why was she able to produce evidence that proved that he was?
This is not a criminal matter but it may become a civil matter. Therefore his guilt or lack thereof will be based on a preponderance of the evidence, not reasonable doubt. I'd say the preponderance of evidence is not in his favor. Wouldn't you agree?
Third is that I have two daughters who live in GB and both have had ties with the Packer organization during Favre's entire career. When this whole thing hit the press I called both of them for their opinions and both thought that it was absolutely true because he'd been doing much the same in GB for years. Naturally GB fans will do anything they can to help cover up the indescretions of their hometown heros. They've been doing it all the way back to the days of Paul Hornung and beyond and I have no doubt they were mum about Favre's dalliances as well.
The bottom line is that I have great and nearly irrefutable facts from which to draw my conclusions from. Those conclusions, combined with logic, have caused me to form an opinion that Brett Favre was doing all he could do dip his wick in Ms. Sterger. Just think about this Henry. If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, has webb feet, likes to swim in ponds, and wants to fvck ducks other than his duck mate then most likely he is a duck.
Henry you must have been the judge who wrote the opinion in my divorce case. You're an expert at giving the guilty the benefit of the doubt.
-
High Fives / Like - 2 High Fives, 0 Dislikes
-
I'd hit it again.
-
High Fives / Like - 3 High Fives, 0 Dislikes
-

Originally Posted by
BigClaws
I'd hit it again.

That is some high quality poon tang!
-

Originally Posted by
BigClaws
I'd hit it again.

Hell BC, I haven't even hit it the first time so I'll wait until that's over before I take a second helping. No sloppy seconds though so you boys try to control yourselves. 
PS: I see she's already set up for one of my favorite postions.
-
High Fives / Like - 1 High Fives, 0 Dislikes
-

Originally Posted by
soulman
Hell BC, I haven't even hit it the first time so I'll wait until that's over before I take a second helping. No sloppy seconds though so you boys try to control yourselves.
PS: I see she's already set up for one of my favorite postions.
I see that we are all chasin' the muff! lol