Another familiar story; ecspecially in Souls area; apparently Tebow is still struggling w/that whole throwing thing. Guess he doesn't think it's imporant for being a starting qb in the nfl.
Sanchez and Hill Hook Up in Jets OTAs While Holmes Is Away and Tebow Struggles | Bleacher Report
The same can be said for any WR in the league. No receiver looks amazing with a shitty QB throwing them the ball. Our receivers are one of the best in the NFL statistically based on production per catch. Jordy Nelson was actually #1 in the NFL last season based on value per play and he isn't even our #1 option.Originally Posted by little bear
Last edited by Evernight; 05-25-2012 at 03:21 PM.
Born in 85 thus I can't remember a time when we didn't have one.
Yet people will still love him and proclaim him the greatest ever despite being horrible.
But he's a "winner" and a decent human being.
His defense and run game are what win games for him. The rest is just blind luck. It's painfully obvious he has no idea how to read defenses when you watch him play. Sure he can bomb one to a receiver that's so wide open even I could probably hit him. He's just nowhere near good enough to deserve the amount of hype he receives.
He's an All Pro top 5 WR and he's been productive everywhere he's been even with QB's of far less talent than Cutler. I watched what they could do when they played in Denver and neither was anywhere near as good then as they have become since then. We also brought in Jeremy Bates who was Cutler's QB coach and OC in Denver. He's knows Cutler's game very well and he'll most likely do at least some of the play calling. Tice's offenses in Minny weren't too bad. You should remember that era.I'm sorry sir, but you lost me at "and Hester".
Every year it's "Hester will be good this year" and it ends with "yeah..........he did alright......he.........caught a pass......."
A tad early to label Marshall the end all be all when he has yet to take a snap in a game for the Bears, don't you think? You do have a long history of having OCs that have no fucking clue what they're doing after all.Granted he can't possibly be worse than Hester, but still.
Hester is effective when used sparingly and he's not effective when you try to make an everyday WR out of him which is what they've been trying to do ever since he got here. So instead of playing 60 snaps a game you play him 20 with plays designed to isolate him with guys who'll struggle with coverage. He'll burn teams with his speed if he's not well covered. You gotta decide who that Safety is gonna cover over the top when you have the others out there as well. Those guys can catch.
I'll be looking forward to the Packer games this year when we show up and they say ooops, they've got an offense now too. I'm not at all concerned about what the guys we have can do.
I'm getting to that age where a lifetime warranty just doesn't mean as much to me anymore as an afternoon nap.
Honey Badger Don't Care. Honey Badger Don't Give a Shit.
But it isn't just one player. It's several. And I wouldn't be bragging on that line of yours too much either. That's a weak spot for the Packers as well.
I'm getting to that age where a lifetime warranty just doesn't mean as much to me anymore as an afternoon nap.
Honey Badger Don't Care. Honey Badger Don't Give a Shit.
I have no concern about our offense either. It's the defense I'm concerned about. We shouldn't HAVE to put up 30+ points a game to win (though we seldom have problems doing so) if the defense is doing their job. If our heavy investment in defensive draft picks pans out, the only direction this defense can go is up.
2012 Offensive Line Rankings - Matchups - Rotoworld.com
Overall we aren't #1, but our line provides good pass protection. Our weak spot is our run game, which doesn't matter a whole lot because we don't run that often (or need to).
Last edited by Evernight; 05-25-2012 at 08:21 PM.
Posting Permissions
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
