-

Originally Posted by
Evernight
The same can be said for any WR in the league. No receiver looks amazing with a shitty QB throwing them the ball. Our receivers are one of the best in the NFL statistically based on production per catch. Jordy Nelson was actually #1 in the NFL last season based on value per play and he isn't even our #1 option.
Geez I don't know about that. Marshall has been pretty consistent everywhere he's been. He's been playing with some very average QB's the last few years and it hasn't hurt him much. His only two years with Cutler were 2007 and 2008 and those were his two best years. After that it was Orton, Henne, and Moore. No Rodgers or Brady's in that bunch yet he still had at least 1000 yards receiving every year.
Brandon Marshall # WR
Chicago Bears | Official Team Site
Height: 6-4 Weight: 230 Age: 28
Born: 3/23/1984 Pittsburgh , PA
College: Central Florida
Experience: 6th season
High School: Lake Howell HS [Winter Park, FL]
REC
81
YDS
1,214
AVG
15.0
TDS
6
| WK | OPP | RESULT | Receiving | Rushing | Fumbles |
| Rec | Yds | Avg | Lng | TD | Att | Yds | Avg | Lng | TD | FUM | Lost |
| 15 | @BUF | W 30-23 | 3 | 84 | 28.0 | 65T | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 | 1 |
|
| 16 | @NE | L 24-27 | 6 | 143 | 23.8 | 47 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 13.0 | 13 | 0 | -- | -- |
|
| 17 | NYJ | W 19-17 | 5 | 50 | 10.0 | 19 | 0 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
|
| Season | Team | | Receiving | Rushing | Fumbles |
| G | GS | Rec | Yds | Avg | Lng | TD | Att | Yds | Avg | Lng | TD | FUM | Lost |
| 2011 | Miami Dolphins | 16 | 16 | 81 | 1,214 | 15.0 | 65T | 6 | 1 | 13 | 13.0 | 13 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
|
| 2010 | Miami Dolphins | 14 | 14 | 86 | 1,014 | 11.8 | 46 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1.5 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
|
| 2009 | Denver Broncos | 15 | 13 | 101 | 1,120 | 11.1 | 75T | 10 | 7 | 39 | 5.6 | 14 | 0 | -- | -- |
|
| 2008 | Denver Broncos | 15 | 15 | 104 | 1,265 | 12.2 | 47 | 6 | 2 | -4 | -2.0 | 7 | 0 | 4 | 3 |
|
| 2007 | Denver Broncos | 16 | 16 | 102 | 1,325 | 13.0 | 68T | 7 | 5 | 57 | 11.4 | 24 | 0 | 3 | 1 |
|
| 2006 | Denver Broncos | 15 | 1 | 20 | 309 | 15.5 | 71T | 2 | 2 | 12 | 6.0 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
|
| TOTAL | 494 | 6,247 | 12.6 | 75 | 34 | 19 | 120 | 6.3 | 24 | 0 | 11 | 6 |
I'm getting to that age where a lifetime warranty just doesn't mean as much to me anymore as an afternoon nap.
Honey Badger Don't Care. Honey Badger Don't Give a Shit.
-
High Fives / Like - 2 High Fives, 0 Dislikes
-
-

Originally Posted by
soulman
Geez I don't know about that. Marshall has been pretty consistent everywhere he's been. He's been playing with some very average QB's the last few years and it hasn't hurt him much. His only two years with Cutler were 2007 and 2008 and those were his two best years. After that it was Orton, Henne, and Moore. No Rodgers or Brady's in that bunch yet he still had at least 1000 yards receiving every year.
Brandon Marshall # WR
Chicago Bears |
Official Team Site Height: 6-4
Weight: 230
Age: 28
Born: 3/23/1984 Pittsburgh , PA
College: Central Florida
Experience: 6th season
High School: Lake Howell HS [Winter Park, FL]
REC
81
YDS
1,214
AVG
15.0
TDS
6
| WK | OPP | RESULT | Receiving | Rushing | Fumbles |
| Rec | Yds | Avg | Lng | TD | Att | Yds | Avg | Lng | TD | FUM | Lost |
| 15 | @BUF | W 30-23 | 3 | 84 | 28.0 | 65T | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 | 1 |
|
| 16 | @NE | L 24-27 | 6 | 143 | 23.8 | 47 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 13.0 | 13 | 0 | -- | -- |
|
| 17 | NYJ | W 19-17 | 5 | 50 | 10.0 | 19 | 0 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
|
| Season | Team | | Receiving | Rushing | Fumbles |
| G | GS | Rec | Yds | Avg | Lng | TD | Att | Yds | Avg | Lng | TD | FUM | Lost |
| 2011 | Miami Dolphins | 16 | 16 | 81 | 1,214 | 15.0 | 65T | 6 | 1 | 13 | 13.0 | 13 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
|
| 2010 | Miami Dolphins | 14 | 14 | 86 | 1,014 | 11.8 | 46 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1.5 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
|
| 2009 | Denver Broncos | 15 | 13 | 101 | 1,120 | 11.1 | 75T | 10 | 7 | 39 | 5.6 | 14 | 0 | -- | -- |
|
| 2008 | Denver Broncos | 15 | 15 | 104 | 1,265 | 12.2 | 47 | 6 | 2 | -4 | -2.0 | 7 | 0 | 4 | 3 |
|
| 2007 | Denver Broncos | 16 | 16 | 102 | 1,325 | 13.0 | 68T | 7 | 5 | 57 | 11.4 | 24 | 0 | 3 | 1 |
|
| 2006 | Denver Broncos | 15 | 1 | 20 | 309 | 15.5 | 71T | 2 | 2 | 12 | 6.0 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
|
| TOTAL | 494 | 6,247 | 12.6 | 75 | 34 | 19 | 120 | 6.3 | 24 | 0 | 11 | 6 |
Valid points, however:
2009 Denver Broncos
Brandon Marshall - 101 Receptions
Next three highest players:
Jabar Gaffney with 54, Eddie Royal with 37, and Tony Scheffler with 31.
2010 Miami Dolphins
Brandon Marshall - 86 Receptions
Next three highest players:
Devone Bess with 79, Briane Hartline with 43, and Anthony Fasano with 39
2011 Miami Dolphins
Brandon Marshall - 81 Receptions
Next three highest players:
Davone Bess with 51, Reggie Bush with 43, and Briane Hartline with 35
Clearly he's playing in offenses where he gets targeted quite a bit more often than anyone else. Not saying he hasn't been consistent, but it's not that hard to put up numbers when you're a one man show.
-

Originally Posted by
BigBadPapaBear
We've already seen how GB's offense can be made ineffective. You're living in the past skippy. The Bears have an offense that can put up points like the best of them now.
What have you been smoking because we are no where close to elite offenses of the league. We still have one of the offensive lines in the league and Lovie and company are still running the show. Virginia needs to sell the team to a owner that wants to win, not just fill the seats and collect money.
-

Originally Posted by
Evernight
Sorry, one player isn't going to put Chicago on par with Green Bay's offense, especially with that offensive line. The only position you have that's superior is halfback, and that's not worth a whole lot in this day and age.
But we got Mike Tice running the offense. lol
-

Originally Posted by
4th and 26
What have you been smoking because we are no where close to elite offenses of the league. We still have one of the offensive lines in the league and Lovie and company are still running the show. Virginia needs to sell the team to a owner that wants to win, not just fill the seats and collect money.
Apparently I'm smoking the good stuff. Maybe you should upgrade to the stuff I use because your characterization of the Bears is bordering on the ridiculous. Our offense already showed what it could do during that 5 game win streak with Cutler. That's what we're building on this season, not the 5 games that had Hanie and no Forte. The personel on our offense has been upgraded and there should be no problem at all with Cutler getting this offense to put out 30+ pts a game.
-

Originally Posted by
BigBadPapaBear
Apparently I'm smoking the good stuff. Maybe you should upgrade to the stuff I use because your characterization of the Bears is bordering on the ridiculous. Our offense already showed what it could do during that 5 game win streak with Cutler. That's what we're building on this season, not the 5 games that had Hanie and no Forte. The personel on our offense has been upgraded and there should be no problem at all with Cutler getting this offense to put out 30+ pts a game.
And we also saw what happens to Jay when the OL blows up and Jay keeps taking a beating like he has the previous 2 years. Unless we have an major upgrade in the OL we will still have problems. Second I am not sold on Mike Tice. He did not show me anything over the previous 2 years other than lead the league in sacks. Third we still have that stubborn HC running the show and that is the achilles heal of this team. Forth we brought in players the previous 2 years and failed bigtime with them.
-

Originally Posted by
4th and 26
And we also saw what happens to Jay when the OL blows up and Jay keeps taking a beating like he has the previous 2 years. Unless we have an major upgrade in the OL we will still have problems. Second I am not sold on Mike Tice. He did not show me anything over the previous 2 years other than lead the league in sacks. Third we still have that stubborn HC running the show and that is the achilles heal of this team. Forth we brought in players the previous 2 years and failed bigtime with them.
I keep trying to drill this into heads but they don't listen. It's like they completely gloss over the fact that you guys did squat with your offensive line this off-season once again, which was by far the biggest weakness on your offense. You can add all the receivers you want, but it doesn't matter if your QB doesn't survive long enough to throw them the ball.
I somehow don't see Tice being the big savior here. In his tenure with the Queens, he basically relied on Culpepper throwing the deep ball to Moss all game. If that didn't work, they were pretty much done. Once Moss diva'd his way out the door, their offense disappeared entirely.
-

Originally Posted by
4th and 26
And we also saw what happens to Jay when the OL blows up and Jay keeps taking a beating like he has the previous 2 years. Unless we have an major upgrade in the OL we will still have problems. Second I am not sold on Mike Tice. He did not show me anything over the previous 2 years other than lead the league in sacks. Third we still have that stubborn HC running the show and that is the achilles heal of this team. Forth we brought in players the previous 2 years and failed bigtime with them.
Jay didn't take a beating in that 5 game win streak. Its also a bit unfair to attack Tice for sacks given up, when Martz's offensive scheme produces a ridiculous amount of sacks because of how long some plays take to develop. How many times does this need to be pointed out?
-

Originally Posted by
Evernight
I keep trying to drill this into heads but they don't listen. It's like they completely gloss over the fact that you guys did squat with your offensive line this off-season once again, which was by far the biggest weakness on your offense. You can add all the receivers you want, but it doesn't matter if your QB doesn't survive long enough to throw them the ball.
I somehow don't see Tice being the big savior here. In his tenure with the Queens, he basically relied on Culpepper throwing the deep ball to Moss all game. If that didn't work, they were pretty much done. Once Moss diva'd his way out the door, their offense disappeared entirely.
They're getting people back on the line this offseason and they are expecting better play from guys this year, WHO SAW THEIR FIRST REAL TIME ON THE FIELD LAST YEAR.
-

Originally Posted by
BigBadPapaBear
They're getting people back on the line this offseason and they are expecting better play from guys this year, WHO SAW THEIR FIRST REAL TIME ON THE FIELD LAST YEAR.
They have to expect better play, because from where it is now it can only go up.